Cargando…

Frequency of Follow-Up Attendance and Blood Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetic Patients at Moderate to High Cardiovascular Risk: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care

Regular follow-up attendance in primary care and routine blood glucose monitoring are essential in diabetes management, particularly for patients at higher cardiovascular (CV) risk. We sought to examine the regularity of follow-up attendance and blood glucose monitoring in a primary care sample of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yunyi, Zhong, Qiya, Zhu, Sufen, Cheng, Hui, Huang, Wenyong, Wang, Harry H. X., Li, Yu-Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361055
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114175
Descripción
Sumario:Regular follow-up attendance in primary care and routine blood glucose monitoring are essential in diabetes management, particularly for patients at higher cardiovascular (CV) risk. We sought to examine the regularity of follow-up attendance and blood glucose monitoring in a primary care sample of type 2 diabetic patients at moderate-to-high CV risk, and to explore factors associated with poor engagement. Cross-sectional data were collected from 2130 patients enrolled in a diabetic retinopathy screening programme in Guangdong province, China. Approximately one-third of patients (35.9%) attended clinical follow-up <4 times in the past year. Over half of patients (56.9%) failed to have blood glucose monitored at least once per month. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that rural residents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.420, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.338–0.522, p < 0.001, for follow-up attendance; aOR = 0.580, 95%CI: 0.472–0.712, p < 0.001, for blood glucose monitoring) and subjects with poor awareness of adverse consequences of diabetes complications (aOR = 0.648, 95%CI = 0.527–0.796, p < 0.001, for follow-up attendance; aOR = 0.770, 95%CI = 0.633–0.937, p = 0.009, for blood glucose monitoring) were both less likely to achieve active engagement. Our results revealed an urban–rural divide in patients’ engagement in follow-up attendance and blood glucose monitoring, which suggested the need for different educational approaches tailored to the local context to enhance diabetes care.