Cargando…
Bearing Fault Diagnosis Based on Randomized Fisher Discriminant Analysis
In this paper, a novel randomized Fisher discriminant analysis (RFDA) based bearing fault diagnosis method is proposed. First, several representative time-domain features are extracted from the raw vibration signals. Second, linear Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) is extended to nonlinear FDA name...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218093 |
Sumario: | In this paper, a novel randomized Fisher discriminant analysis (RFDA) based bearing fault diagnosis method is proposed. First, several representative time-domain features are extracted from the raw vibration signals. Second, linear Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) is extended to nonlinear FDA named RFDA by introducing the random feature map to deal with the non-linearity issue. Specifically, the extracted time-domain features data are mapped onto a high-dimensional space using the random feature map function rather than kernel functions. Third, the time-domain features are fed into the built RFDA model to extract the discriminant features for diagnosis. Moreover, a Bayesian inference is employed to identify the class of the collected vibration signals to diagnose the bearing status. The proposed method uses random Fourier features to approximate the kernel matrix in the kernel Fisher discriminant analysis. Through employing randomized Fisher discriminant analysis, the nonlinearity issue is dealt with, and the computational burden is remarkably reduced compared to the kernel Fisher discriminant analysis (KFDA). To illustrate the superior performance of the proposed RFDA-based bearing fault diagnosis method, comparative experiments are conducted on two widely used datasets, the Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) bearing dataset and the Paderborn University (PU) bearing dataset. For the CWRU dataset, the computation time of RFDA is much shorter than KFDA, while the accuracy rate reaches the same level of KFDA. For the PU dataset, the accuracy rate of RFDA is slightly higher than KFDA, and the computation time is only 44.14% of KFDA. |
---|