Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Purpose. Contrast-enhanced (CE) angiographic techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography (CE-CTA), are most commonly used for follow-up imaging after endovascular aneurysm repair. In this study, CE-CTA and non-CE QISS-MRA were compared for the first time for assessing endoleaks and aneurysm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mostafa, Karim, Pfarr, Julian, Langguth, Patrick, Schäfer, Jost Philipp, Trentmann, Jens, Koktzoglou, Ioannis, Edelman, Robert R., Bueno Neves, Fernando, Graessner, Joachim, Both, Marcus, Jansen, Olav, Salehi Ravesh, Mona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216551
_version_ 1784829554550898688
author Mostafa, Karim
Pfarr, Julian
Langguth, Patrick
Schäfer, Jost Philipp
Trentmann, Jens
Koktzoglou, Ioannis
Edelman, Robert R.
Bueno Neves, Fernando
Graessner, Joachim
Both, Marcus
Jansen, Olav
Salehi Ravesh, Mona
author_facet Mostafa, Karim
Pfarr, Julian
Langguth, Patrick
Schäfer, Jost Philipp
Trentmann, Jens
Koktzoglou, Ioannis
Edelman, Robert R.
Bueno Neves, Fernando
Graessner, Joachim
Both, Marcus
Jansen, Olav
Salehi Ravesh, Mona
author_sort Mostafa, Karim
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Contrast-enhanced (CE) angiographic techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography (CE-CTA), are most commonly used for follow-up imaging after endovascular aneurysm repair. In this study, CE-CTA and non-CE QISS-MRA were compared for the first time for assessing endoleaks and aneurysms at follow-up after abdominal EVAR. Methods. Our study included 20 patients (17 male, median age 79.8 years) who underwent radial QISS-MRA and CE-CTA after EVAR at their first follow-up examination. Two interventional radiologists evaluated datasets from both techniques in each patient concerning presence of endoleaks, types of endoleaks, aneurysm diameter, and image quality. Interobserver and intermodal agreement were assessed with Cohen’s Kappa. Results. Image quality was rated as excellent or good for both modalities by both observers. Ferromagnetic embolization materials cause hyperdense artifacts in CE-CTA causing aneurysm sac diameter measurements to be inaccurate by up to 1 cm. Type 2 endoleaks with low-flow characteristics in CE-CTA were overlooked compared to radial QISS-MRA. Compared to CE-CTA, all endoleaks after abdominal EVAR were detected and classified correctly on QISS-MRA. The interobserver agreement between CE-CTA and QISS-MRA was almost perfect, except for type 2 endoleaks, where agreement was substantial. Intermodal aneurysm diameter correlate “very strongly” for both observers. Conclusions. Radial QISS-MRA is a contrast agent free technique for diagnosing and monitoring all types of endoleaks and aneurysms in patients after abdominal EVAR. It provides information about specific clinical questions concerning aneurysm diameter and presence and types of endoleaks without radiation exposure and the side effects associated with iodine-based contrast agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9656900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96569002022-11-15 Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Mostafa, Karim Pfarr, Julian Langguth, Patrick Schäfer, Jost Philipp Trentmann, Jens Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Bueno Neves, Fernando Graessner, Joachim Both, Marcus Jansen, Olav Salehi Ravesh, Mona J Clin Med Article Purpose. Contrast-enhanced (CE) angiographic techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography (CE-CTA), are most commonly used for follow-up imaging after endovascular aneurysm repair. In this study, CE-CTA and non-CE QISS-MRA were compared for the first time for assessing endoleaks and aneurysms at follow-up after abdominal EVAR. Methods. Our study included 20 patients (17 male, median age 79.8 years) who underwent radial QISS-MRA and CE-CTA after EVAR at their first follow-up examination. Two interventional radiologists evaluated datasets from both techniques in each patient concerning presence of endoleaks, types of endoleaks, aneurysm diameter, and image quality. Interobserver and intermodal agreement were assessed with Cohen’s Kappa. Results. Image quality was rated as excellent or good for both modalities by both observers. Ferromagnetic embolization materials cause hyperdense artifacts in CE-CTA causing aneurysm sac diameter measurements to be inaccurate by up to 1 cm. Type 2 endoleaks with low-flow characteristics in CE-CTA were overlooked compared to radial QISS-MRA. Compared to CE-CTA, all endoleaks after abdominal EVAR were detected and classified correctly on QISS-MRA. The interobserver agreement between CE-CTA and QISS-MRA was almost perfect, except for type 2 endoleaks, where agreement was substantial. Intermodal aneurysm diameter correlate “very strongly” for both observers. Conclusions. Radial QISS-MRA is a contrast agent free technique for diagnosing and monitoring all types of endoleaks and aneurysms in patients after abdominal EVAR. It provides information about specific clinical questions concerning aneurysm diameter and presence and types of endoleaks without radiation exposure and the side effects associated with iodine-based contrast agents. MDPI 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9656900/ /pubmed/36362779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216551 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mostafa, Karim
Pfarr, Julian
Langguth, Patrick
Schäfer, Jost Philipp
Trentmann, Jens
Koktzoglou, Ioannis
Edelman, Robert R.
Bueno Neves, Fernando
Graessner, Joachim
Both, Marcus
Jansen, Olav
Salehi Ravesh, Mona
Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_full Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_short Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_sort clinical evaluation of non-contrast-enhanced radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (qiss) magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of endoleaks after abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216551
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafakarim clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT pfarrjulian clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT langguthpatrick clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT schaferjostphilipp clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT trentmannjens clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT koktzoglouioannis clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT edelmanrobertr clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT buenonevesfernando clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT graessnerjoachim clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT bothmarcus clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT jansenolav clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT salehiraveshmona clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair