Cargando…
Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
Purpose. Contrast-enhanced (CE) angiographic techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography (CE-CTA), are most commonly used for follow-up imaging after endovascular aneurysm repair. In this study, CE-CTA and non-CE QISS-MRA were compared for the first time for assessing endoleaks and aneurysm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216551 |
_version_ | 1784829554550898688 |
---|---|
author | Mostafa, Karim Pfarr, Julian Langguth, Patrick Schäfer, Jost Philipp Trentmann, Jens Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Bueno Neves, Fernando Graessner, Joachim Both, Marcus Jansen, Olav Salehi Ravesh, Mona |
author_facet | Mostafa, Karim Pfarr, Julian Langguth, Patrick Schäfer, Jost Philipp Trentmann, Jens Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Bueno Neves, Fernando Graessner, Joachim Both, Marcus Jansen, Olav Salehi Ravesh, Mona |
author_sort | Mostafa, Karim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. Contrast-enhanced (CE) angiographic techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography (CE-CTA), are most commonly used for follow-up imaging after endovascular aneurysm repair. In this study, CE-CTA and non-CE QISS-MRA were compared for the first time for assessing endoleaks and aneurysms at follow-up after abdominal EVAR. Methods. Our study included 20 patients (17 male, median age 79.8 years) who underwent radial QISS-MRA and CE-CTA after EVAR at their first follow-up examination. Two interventional radiologists evaluated datasets from both techniques in each patient concerning presence of endoleaks, types of endoleaks, aneurysm diameter, and image quality. Interobserver and intermodal agreement were assessed with Cohen’s Kappa. Results. Image quality was rated as excellent or good for both modalities by both observers. Ferromagnetic embolization materials cause hyperdense artifacts in CE-CTA causing aneurysm sac diameter measurements to be inaccurate by up to 1 cm. Type 2 endoleaks with low-flow characteristics in CE-CTA were overlooked compared to radial QISS-MRA. Compared to CE-CTA, all endoleaks after abdominal EVAR were detected and classified correctly on QISS-MRA. The interobserver agreement between CE-CTA and QISS-MRA was almost perfect, except for type 2 endoleaks, where agreement was substantial. Intermodal aneurysm diameter correlate “very strongly” for both observers. Conclusions. Radial QISS-MRA is a contrast agent free technique for diagnosing and monitoring all types of endoleaks and aneurysms in patients after abdominal EVAR. It provides information about specific clinical questions concerning aneurysm diameter and presence and types of endoleaks without radiation exposure and the side effects associated with iodine-based contrast agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9656900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96569002022-11-15 Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Mostafa, Karim Pfarr, Julian Langguth, Patrick Schäfer, Jost Philipp Trentmann, Jens Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Bueno Neves, Fernando Graessner, Joachim Both, Marcus Jansen, Olav Salehi Ravesh, Mona J Clin Med Article Purpose. Contrast-enhanced (CE) angiographic techniques, such as computed tomographic angiography (CE-CTA), are most commonly used for follow-up imaging after endovascular aneurysm repair. In this study, CE-CTA and non-CE QISS-MRA were compared for the first time for assessing endoleaks and aneurysms at follow-up after abdominal EVAR. Methods. Our study included 20 patients (17 male, median age 79.8 years) who underwent radial QISS-MRA and CE-CTA after EVAR at their first follow-up examination. Two interventional radiologists evaluated datasets from both techniques in each patient concerning presence of endoleaks, types of endoleaks, aneurysm diameter, and image quality. Interobserver and intermodal agreement were assessed with Cohen’s Kappa. Results. Image quality was rated as excellent or good for both modalities by both observers. Ferromagnetic embolization materials cause hyperdense artifacts in CE-CTA causing aneurysm sac diameter measurements to be inaccurate by up to 1 cm. Type 2 endoleaks with low-flow characteristics in CE-CTA were overlooked compared to radial QISS-MRA. Compared to CE-CTA, all endoleaks after abdominal EVAR were detected and classified correctly on QISS-MRA. The interobserver agreement between CE-CTA and QISS-MRA was almost perfect, except for type 2 endoleaks, where agreement was substantial. Intermodal aneurysm diameter correlate “very strongly” for both observers. Conclusions. Radial QISS-MRA is a contrast agent free technique for diagnosing and monitoring all types of endoleaks and aneurysms in patients after abdominal EVAR. It provides information about specific clinical questions concerning aneurysm diameter and presence and types of endoleaks without radiation exposure and the side effects associated with iodine-based contrast agents. MDPI 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9656900/ /pubmed/36362779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216551 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mostafa, Karim Pfarr, Julian Langguth, Patrick Schäfer, Jost Philipp Trentmann, Jens Koktzoglou, Ioannis Edelman, Robert R. Bueno Neves, Fernando Graessner, Joachim Both, Marcus Jansen, Olav Salehi Ravesh, Mona Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair |
title | Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair |
title_full | Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair |
title_fullStr | Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair |
title_short | Clinical Evaluation of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Endoleaks after Abdominal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of non-contrast-enhanced radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (qiss) magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of endoleaks after abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mostafakarim clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT pfarrjulian clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT langguthpatrick clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT schaferjostphilipp clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT trentmannjens clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT koktzoglouioannis clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT edelmanrobertr clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT buenonevesfernando clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT graessnerjoachim clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT bothmarcus clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT jansenolav clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair AT salehiraveshmona clinicalevaluationofnoncontrastenhancedradialquiescentintervalsliceselectiveqissmagneticresonanceangiographyincomparisontocontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyangiographyfortheevaluationofendoleaksafterabdominalendovascularaneurysmrepair |