Cargando…

Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic data collection has become an important practice in zoos. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We further compared two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness in and suita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galante, Julia, Margulis, Susan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12213031
_version_ 1784829611910103040
author Galante, Julia
Margulis, Susan W.
author_facet Galante, Julia
Margulis, Susan W.
author_sort Galante, Julia
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic data collection has become an important practice in zoos. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We further compared two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness in and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. There was considerable individual variation in penguin behavior in terms of activity, time spent in water, and courtship behaviors. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We note the importance of evaluating data collection tools before embarking on a study to ensure that the tool will provide data in a form that can be easily interpreted. ABSTRACT: Systematic data collection has become increasingly important in zoos as it facilitates evidence-based decision-making. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We used two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. Data were collected using instantaneous scan sampling and all-occurrence sampling 2–3 times per week for 2 years for a total of nearly 240 h of observation (19 h with one system and 219 h with the other system). The activity patterns (in particular, time spent in the water) differed amongst penguins and between the two data collection tools. Patterns of courtship-related behaviors varied tremendously across individuals. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We highlight two important considerations for institutions aiming to collect such systematic data. First, it is critical to interpret all findings in context by incorporating husbandry details and keeper insights to highlight explanations that may not be readily apparent from the data. Second, one must explore all aspects of any data collection system before committing to its use—system setup, ease of data collection, format and accessibility of exported data. Not doing so may negate the value of systematic data collection by limiting the use and interpretability of the data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96571212022-11-15 Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength Galante, Julia Margulis, Susan W. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic data collection has become an important practice in zoos. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We further compared two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness in and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. There was considerable individual variation in penguin behavior in terms of activity, time spent in water, and courtship behaviors. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We note the importance of evaluating data collection tools before embarking on a study to ensure that the tool will provide data in a form that can be easily interpreted. ABSTRACT: Systematic data collection has become increasingly important in zoos as it facilitates evidence-based decision-making. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We used two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. Data were collected using instantaneous scan sampling and all-occurrence sampling 2–3 times per week for 2 years for a total of nearly 240 h of observation (19 h with one system and 219 h with the other system). The activity patterns (in particular, time spent in the water) differed amongst penguins and between the two data collection tools. Patterns of courtship-related behaviors varied tremendously across individuals. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We highlight two important considerations for institutions aiming to collect such systematic data. First, it is critical to interpret all findings in context by incorporating husbandry details and keeper insights to highlight explanations that may not be readily apparent from the data. Second, one must explore all aspects of any data collection system before committing to its use—system setup, ease of data collection, format and accessibility of exported data. Not doing so may negate the value of systematic data collection by limiting the use and interpretability of the data. MDPI 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9657121/ /pubmed/36359155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12213031 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Galante, Julia
Margulis, Susan W.
Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength
title Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength
title_full Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength
title_fullStr Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength
title_short Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength
title_sort comparing data collection tools for zoo management decision-making: a case study examining behavioral measures of humboldt penguin bond strength
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12213031
work_keys_str_mv AT galantejulia comparingdatacollectiontoolsforzoomanagementdecisionmakingacasestudyexaminingbehavioralmeasuresofhumboldtpenguinbondstrength
AT margulissusanw comparingdatacollectiontoolsforzoomanagementdecisionmakingacasestudyexaminingbehavioralmeasuresofhumboldtpenguinbondstrength