Cargando…
Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic data collection has become an important practice in zoos. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We further compared two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness in and suita...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12213031 |
_version_ | 1784829611910103040 |
---|---|
author | Galante, Julia Margulis, Susan W. |
author_facet | Galante, Julia Margulis, Susan W. |
author_sort | Galante, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic data collection has become an important practice in zoos. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We further compared two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness in and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. There was considerable individual variation in penguin behavior in terms of activity, time spent in water, and courtship behaviors. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We note the importance of evaluating data collection tools before embarking on a study to ensure that the tool will provide data in a form that can be easily interpreted. ABSTRACT: Systematic data collection has become increasingly important in zoos as it facilitates evidence-based decision-making. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We used two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. Data were collected using instantaneous scan sampling and all-occurrence sampling 2–3 times per week for 2 years for a total of nearly 240 h of observation (19 h with one system and 219 h with the other system). The activity patterns (in particular, time spent in the water) differed amongst penguins and between the two data collection tools. Patterns of courtship-related behaviors varied tremendously across individuals. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We highlight two important considerations for institutions aiming to collect such systematic data. First, it is critical to interpret all findings in context by incorporating husbandry details and keeper insights to highlight explanations that may not be readily apparent from the data. Second, one must explore all aspects of any data collection system before committing to its use—system setup, ease of data collection, format and accessibility of exported data. Not doing so may negate the value of systematic data collection by limiting the use and interpretability of the data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9657121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96571212022-11-15 Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength Galante, Julia Margulis, Susan W. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Systematic data collection has become an important practice in zoos. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We further compared two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness in and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. There was considerable individual variation in penguin behavior in terms of activity, time spent in water, and courtship behaviors. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We note the importance of evaluating data collection tools before embarking on a study to ensure that the tool will provide data in a form that can be easily interpreted. ABSTRACT: Systematic data collection has become increasingly important in zoos as it facilitates evidence-based decision-making. Here, we describe the results of a two-year study on exhibit use and pair-bonding in a colony of Humboldt penguins. We used two different data collection apps to evaluate their effectiveness and suitability for evaluating pair-bond strength. Data were collected using instantaneous scan sampling and all-occurrence sampling 2–3 times per week for 2 years for a total of nearly 240 h of observation (19 h with one system and 219 h with the other system). The activity patterns (in particular, time spent in the water) differed amongst penguins and between the two data collection tools. Patterns of courtship-related behaviors varied tremendously across individuals. The longer pairs had been bonded, the more time they spent in close proximity. We highlight two important considerations for institutions aiming to collect such systematic data. First, it is critical to interpret all findings in context by incorporating husbandry details and keeper insights to highlight explanations that may not be readily apparent from the data. Second, one must explore all aspects of any data collection system before committing to its use—system setup, ease of data collection, format and accessibility of exported data. Not doing so may negate the value of systematic data collection by limiting the use and interpretability of the data. MDPI 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9657121/ /pubmed/36359155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12213031 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Galante, Julia Margulis, Susan W. Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength |
title | Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength |
title_full | Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength |
title_fullStr | Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength |
title_short | Comparing Data Collection Tools for Zoo Management Decision-Making: A Case Study Examining Behavioral Measures of Humboldt Penguin Bond Strength |
title_sort | comparing data collection tools for zoo management decision-making: a case study examining behavioral measures of humboldt penguin bond strength |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36359155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12213031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galantejulia comparingdatacollectiontoolsforzoomanagementdecisionmakingacasestudyexaminingbehavioralmeasuresofhumboldtpenguinbondstrength AT margulissusanw comparingdatacollectiontoolsforzoomanagementdecisionmakingacasestudyexaminingbehavioralmeasuresofhumboldtpenguinbondstrength |