Cargando…

The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation †

Soot molecules are hazardous compounds threatening human health. Computational chemistry provides efficient tools for studying them. However, accurate quantum chemistry calculation is costly for the simulation of large-size soot molecules and high-throughput calculations. Semi-empirical (SE) quantum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cong, Yang, Zhai, Yu, Chen, Xin, Li, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113371
_version_ 1784829617841897472
author Cong, Yang
Zhai, Yu
Chen, Xin
Li, Hui
author_facet Cong, Yang
Zhai, Yu
Chen, Xin
Li, Hui
author_sort Cong, Yang
collection PubMed
description Soot molecules are hazardous compounds threatening human health. Computational chemistry provides efficient tools for studying them. However, accurate quantum chemistry calculation is costly for the simulation of large-size soot molecules and high-throughput calculations. Semi-empirical (SE) quantum chemistry methods are optional choices for balancing computational costs. In this work, we validated the performances of several widely used SE methods in the description of soot formation. Our benchmark study focuses on, but is not limited to, the validation of the performances of SE methods on reactive and non-reactive MD trajectory calculations. We also examined the accuracy of SE methods of predicting soot precursor structures and energy profiles along intrinsic reaction coordinate(s) (IRC). Finally, we discussed the spin density predicted by SE methods. The SE methods validated include AM1, PM6, PM7, GFN2-xTB, DFTB2, with or without spin-polarization, and DFTB3. We found that the shape of MD trajectory profiles, the relative energy, and molecular structures predicted by SE methods are qualitatively correct. We suggest that SE methods can be used in massive reaction soot formation event sampling and primary reaction mechanism generation. Yet, they cannot be used to provide quantitatively accurate data, such as thermodynamic and reaction kinetics ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96571442022-11-15 The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation † Cong, Yang Zhai, Yu Chen, Xin Li, Hui Int J Mol Sci Article Soot molecules are hazardous compounds threatening human health. Computational chemistry provides efficient tools for studying them. However, accurate quantum chemistry calculation is costly for the simulation of large-size soot molecules and high-throughput calculations. Semi-empirical (SE) quantum chemistry methods are optional choices for balancing computational costs. In this work, we validated the performances of several widely used SE methods in the description of soot formation. Our benchmark study focuses on, but is not limited to, the validation of the performances of SE methods on reactive and non-reactive MD trajectory calculations. We also examined the accuracy of SE methods of predicting soot precursor structures and energy profiles along intrinsic reaction coordinate(s) (IRC). Finally, we discussed the spin density predicted by SE methods. The SE methods validated include AM1, PM6, PM7, GFN2-xTB, DFTB2, with or without spin-polarization, and DFTB3. We found that the shape of MD trajectory profiles, the relative energy, and molecular structures predicted by SE methods are qualitatively correct. We suggest that SE methods can be used in massive reaction soot formation event sampling and primary reaction mechanism generation. Yet, they cannot be used to provide quantitatively accurate data, such as thermodynamic and reaction kinetics ones. MDPI 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9657144/ /pubmed/36362159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113371 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cong, Yang
Zhai, Yu
Chen, Xin
Li, Hui
The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation †
title The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation †
title_full The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation †
title_fullStr The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation †
title_full_unstemmed The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation †
title_short The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation †
title_sort accuracy of semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods on soot formation simulation †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113371
work_keys_str_mv AT congyang theaccuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation
AT zhaiyu theaccuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation
AT chenxin theaccuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation
AT lihui theaccuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation
AT congyang accuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation
AT zhaiyu accuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation
AT chenxin accuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation
AT lihui accuracyofsemiempiricalquantumchemistrymethodsonsootformationsimulation