Cargando…

Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE: To determine if intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are associated with an increased risk of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) erosions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients with diabetic retinopathy and had...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islam, Yasmin Florence Khodeja, Vanner, Elizabeth A, Maharaj, Arindel S R, Schwartz, Stephen G, Kishor, Krishna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389643
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S386033
_version_ 1784829645958414336
author Islam, Yasmin Florence Khodeja
Vanner, Elizabeth A
Maharaj, Arindel S R
Schwartz, Stephen G
Kishor, Krishna
author_facet Islam, Yasmin Florence Khodeja
Vanner, Elizabeth A
Maharaj, Arindel S R
Schwartz, Stephen G
Kishor, Krishna
author_sort Islam, Yasmin Florence Khodeja
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine if intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are associated with an increased risk of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) erosions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients with diabetic retinopathy and had a GDD implanted at a large academic institution. The rate of GDD erosions was compared between eyes that did or did not receive intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. A subanalysis was also performed the relationship between diabetic macular edema (DME) and intravitreal steroid injections and GDD erosions. RESULTS: A total of 677 eyes from 608 patients was included. A total of 447 eyes received at least one anti-VEGF injection; 230 eyes never received such therapy. Twenty eyes (4.5%) receiving anti-VEGF had at least one erosion event, compared to 7 eyes (3.0%) of patients not receiving anti-VEGF therapy (OR 1.49, p=0.37). Diabetic macular edema was associated with a significantly increased rate of erosion in eyes not receiving anti-VEGF (71.4% versus 31.4%, p=0.034), but not in eyes receiving anti-VEGF (30.0% versus 40.7%, p=0.34). Receiving more than one specific anti-VEGF agent, an increased frequency or total number of anti-VEGF injections, or receiving intravitreal steroids were not associated with an increased risk of erosion (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetic retinopathy, the use of anti-VEGF does not result in an increased rate of GDD erosions or recurrent erosions. Further research is needed over a longer follow-up period to determine if longer or more frequent anti-VEGF treatment is a risk factor for recurrent erosions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96572532022-11-15 Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy Islam, Yasmin Florence Khodeja Vanner, Elizabeth A Maharaj, Arindel S R Schwartz, Stephen G Kishor, Krishna Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To determine if intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are associated with an increased risk of glaucoma drainage device (GDD) erosions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted including patients with diabetic retinopathy and had a GDD implanted at a large academic institution. The rate of GDD erosions was compared between eyes that did or did not receive intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. A subanalysis was also performed the relationship between diabetic macular edema (DME) and intravitreal steroid injections and GDD erosions. RESULTS: A total of 677 eyes from 608 patients was included. A total of 447 eyes received at least one anti-VEGF injection; 230 eyes never received such therapy. Twenty eyes (4.5%) receiving anti-VEGF had at least one erosion event, compared to 7 eyes (3.0%) of patients not receiving anti-VEGF therapy (OR 1.49, p=0.37). Diabetic macular edema was associated with a significantly increased rate of erosion in eyes not receiving anti-VEGF (71.4% versus 31.4%, p=0.034), but not in eyes receiving anti-VEGF (30.0% versus 40.7%, p=0.34). Receiving more than one specific anti-VEGF agent, an increased frequency or total number of anti-VEGF injections, or receiving intravitreal steroids were not associated with an increased risk of erosion (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetic retinopathy, the use of anti-VEGF does not result in an increased rate of GDD erosions or recurrent erosions. Further research is needed over a longer follow-up period to determine if longer or more frequent anti-VEGF treatment is a risk factor for recurrent erosions. Dove 2022-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9657253/ /pubmed/36389643 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S386033 Text en © 2022 Islam et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Islam, Yasmin Florence Khodeja
Vanner, Elizabeth A
Maharaj, Arindel S R
Schwartz, Stephen G
Kishor, Krishna
Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy
title Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_full Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_fullStr Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_short Glaucoma Drainage Device Erosions in Patients Receiving Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy
title_sort glaucoma drainage device erosions in patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic retinopathy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389643
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S386033
work_keys_str_mv AT islamyasminflorencekhodeja glaucomadrainagedeviceerosionsinpatientsreceivingantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapyfordiabeticretinopathy
AT vannerelizabetha glaucomadrainagedeviceerosionsinpatientsreceivingantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapyfordiabeticretinopathy
AT maharajarindelsr glaucomadrainagedeviceerosionsinpatientsreceivingantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapyfordiabeticretinopathy
AT schwartzstepheng glaucomadrainagedeviceerosionsinpatientsreceivingantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapyfordiabeticretinopathy
AT kishorkrishna glaucomadrainagedeviceerosionsinpatientsreceivingantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapyfordiabeticretinopathy