Cargando…

Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome

(1) Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster-based disorder comprising several pre-disease or pre-clinical statuses for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk, and mortality. Appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM), or lean mass, is considered the main site of insulin-mediate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Hyun Eui, Lee, Tae Sic, Chung, Tae-Ha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216309
_version_ 1784829690049986560
author Moon, Hyun Eui
Lee, Tae Sic
Chung, Tae-Ha
author_facet Moon, Hyun Eui
Lee, Tae Sic
Chung, Tae-Ha
author_sort Moon, Hyun Eui
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster-based disorder comprising several pre-disease or pre-clinical statuses for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk, and mortality. Appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM), or lean mass, is considered the main site of insulin-mediated glucose utilization. Therefore, we aimed to reveal the association between lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass to upper appendicular skeletal muscle mass ratio (LUR) and risk for MetS. (2) Methods: We analyzed the 2008–2011 Korean National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey (KNHANES) data. Quintiles of lower ASM to upper ASM ratio (LUR) were categorized as follows: Q1: ≤2.65, Q2: 2.66–2.80, Q3: 2.81–2.94, Q4: 2.95–3.11, and Q5: ≥3.12 in men and Q1: ≤3.00, Q2: 3.01–3.18, Q3: 3.19–3.36, Q4: 3.37–3.60, and Q5: ≥3.61 in women. Multivariate logistic regression models were used after setting MetS and the LUR quintiles as the independent and dependent variables and adjusting for covariates. (3) Result: In men, MetS in accordance with the LUR quintiles exhibits a reverse J-curve. All groups from Q2 to Q5 had a lower odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for MetS compared to the Q1 group. The lowest OR (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.80–0.91) was observed in Q4. However, in women, the figure shows a sine curve. Compared to the Q1 group, the Q2 and Q3 groups had a higher OR, while the Q4 and Q5 groups presented a lower OR. Among them, the OR (95% CI) in the Q4 group was lowest, at 0.83 (0.76–0.91). (4) Conclusions: While total appendicular skeletal muscle mass is important to prevent MetS, it is necessary to maintain an optimal ratio of muscle mass between the upper and lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96574212022-11-15 Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome Moon, Hyun Eui Lee, Tae Sic Chung, Tae-Ha J Clin Med Article (1) Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster-based disorder comprising several pre-disease or pre-clinical statuses for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk, and mortality. Appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM), or lean mass, is considered the main site of insulin-mediated glucose utilization. Therefore, we aimed to reveal the association between lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass to upper appendicular skeletal muscle mass ratio (LUR) and risk for MetS. (2) Methods: We analyzed the 2008–2011 Korean National Health Examination and Nutrition Survey (KNHANES) data. Quintiles of lower ASM to upper ASM ratio (LUR) were categorized as follows: Q1: ≤2.65, Q2: 2.66–2.80, Q3: 2.81–2.94, Q4: 2.95–3.11, and Q5: ≥3.12 in men and Q1: ≤3.00, Q2: 3.01–3.18, Q3: 3.19–3.36, Q4: 3.37–3.60, and Q5: ≥3.61 in women. Multivariate logistic regression models were used after setting MetS and the LUR quintiles as the independent and dependent variables and adjusting for covariates. (3) Result: In men, MetS in accordance with the LUR quintiles exhibits a reverse J-curve. All groups from Q2 to Q5 had a lower odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for MetS compared to the Q1 group. The lowest OR (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.80–0.91) was observed in Q4. However, in women, the figure shows a sine curve. Compared to the Q1 group, the Q2 and Q3 groups had a higher OR, while the Q4 and Q5 groups presented a lower OR. Among them, the OR (95% CI) in the Q4 group was lowest, at 0.83 (0.76–0.91). (4) Conclusions: While total appendicular skeletal muscle mass is important to prevent MetS, it is necessary to maintain an optimal ratio of muscle mass between the upper and lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass. MDPI 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9657421/ /pubmed/36362539 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216309 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moon, Hyun Eui
Lee, Tae Sic
Chung, Tae-Ha
Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome
title Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome
title_full Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome
title_fullStr Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome
title_short Association between Lower-to-Upper Ratio of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle and Metabolic Syndrome
title_sort association between lower-to-upper ratio of appendicular skeletal muscle and metabolic syndrome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362539
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216309
work_keys_str_mv AT moonhyuneui associationbetweenlowertoupperratioofappendicularskeletalmuscleandmetabolicsyndrome
AT leetaesic associationbetweenlowertoupperratioofappendicularskeletalmuscleandmetabolicsyndrome
AT chungtaeha associationbetweenlowertoupperratioofappendicularskeletalmuscleandmetabolicsyndrome