Cargando…

Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences

In this commentary, we explore the disproportionate risk women experience with the insertion of various medical devices. Although pre-market device testing and complication tracking could be improved for all, a failure to consider sex differences in hormones, anatomy, inflammatory responses, and phy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Susan P., Gee, Katrina, Wells, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114524
_version_ 1784829695481610240
author Phillips, Susan P.
Gee, Katrina
Wells, Laura
author_facet Phillips, Susan P.
Gee, Katrina
Wells, Laura
author_sort Phillips, Susan P.
collection PubMed
description In this commentary, we explore the disproportionate risk women experience with the insertion of various medical devices. Although pre-market device testing and complication tracking could be improved for all, a failure to consider sex differences in hormones, anatomy, inflammatory responses, and physical function puts women at particular risk. This invisibility of women is an example of gender bias in medical science and practice, a bias that could be corrected in the ways we suggest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96574422022-11-15 Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences Phillips, Susan P. Gee, Katrina Wells, Laura Int J Environ Res Public Health Commentary In this commentary, we explore the disproportionate risk women experience with the insertion of various medical devices. Although pre-market device testing and complication tracking could be improved for all, a failure to consider sex differences in hormones, anatomy, inflammatory responses, and physical function puts women at particular risk. This invisibility of women is an example of gender bias in medical science and practice, a bias that could be corrected in the ways we suggest. MDPI 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9657442/ /pubmed/36361403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114524 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Commentary
Phillips, Susan P.
Gee, Katrina
Wells, Laura
Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences
title Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences
title_full Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences
title_fullStr Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences
title_full_unstemmed Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences
title_short Medical Devices, Invisible Women, Harmful Consequences
title_sort medical devices, invisible women, harmful consequences
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114524
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipssusanp medicaldevicesinvisiblewomenharmfulconsequences
AT geekatrina medicaldevicesinvisiblewomenharmfulconsequences
AT wellslaura medicaldevicesinvisiblewomenharmfulconsequences