Cargando…

Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice

The most robust and economical method for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is to identify mycobacteria acid-fast bacilli (AFB) under acid-fast staining, despite its disadvantages of low sensitivity and labor intensity. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in TB-smear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Hsiao-Ting, Tu, Hui-Zin, Lee, Herng-Sheng, Lin, Yusen Eason, Lin, Che-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218497
_version_ 1784829769655779328
author Fu, Hsiao-Ting
Tu, Hui-Zin
Lee, Herng-Sheng
Lin, Yusen Eason
Lin, Che-Wei
author_facet Fu, Hsiao-Ting
Tu, Hui-Zin
Lee, Herng-Sheng
Lin, Yusen Eason
Lin, Che-Wei
author_sort Fu, Hsiao-Ting
collection PubMed
description The most robust and economical method for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is to identify mycobacteria acid-fast bacilli (AFB) under acid-fast staining, despite its disadvantages of low sensitivity and labor intensity. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in TB-smear microscopy to assist medical technologists with routine AFB smear microscopy. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a TB automated system consisting of a microscopic scanner and recognition program powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning. This AI-based system can detect AFB and classify the level from 0 to 4+. A total of 5930 smears were evaluated on the performance of this automatic system in identifying AFB in daily lab practice. At the first stage, 120 images were analyzed per smear, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 91.3%, 60.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. In the second stage, 200 images were analyzed per smear, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were increased to 93.7%, 77.4%, and 96.6%. After removing disqualifying smears caused by poor staining quality and smear preparation, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were improved to 95.2%, 85.7%, and 96.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the automated system recovered 85 positive smears initially identified as negative by manual screening. Our results suggested that the automated TB system could achieve higher sensitivity and laboratory efficiency than manual microscopy under the quality control of smear preparation. Automated TB smear screening systems can serve as a screening tool at the first screen before manual microcopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96577272022-11-15 Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice Fu, Hsiao-Ting Tu, Hui-Zin Lee, Herng-Sheng Lin, Yusen Eason Lin, Che-Wei Sensors (Basel) Article The most robust and economical method for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is to identify mycobacteria acid-fast bacilli (AFB) under acid-fast staining, despite its disadvantages of low sensitivity and labor intensity. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in TB-smear microscopy to assist medical technologists with routine AFB smear microscopy. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a TB automated system consisting of a microscopic scanner and recognition program powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning. This AI-based system can detect AFB and classify the level from 0 to 4+. A total of 5930 smears were evaluated on the performance of this automatic system in identifying AFB in daily lab practice. At the first stage, 120 images were analyzed per smear, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 91.3%, 60.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. In the second stage, 200 images were analyzed per smear, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were increased to 93.7%, 77.4%, and 96.6%. After removing disqualifying smears caused by poor staining quality and smear preparation, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were improved to 95.2%, 85.7%, and 96.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the automated system recovered 85 positive smears initially identified as negative by manual screening. Our results suggested that the automated TB system could achieve higher sensitivity and laboratory efficiency than manual microscopy under the quality control of smear preparation. Automated TB smear screening systems can serve as a screening tool at the first screen before manual microcopy. MDPI 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9657727/ /pubmed/36366194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218497 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fu, Hsiao-Ting
Tu, Hui-Zin
Lee, Herng-Sheng
Lin, Yusen Eason
Lin, Che-Wei
Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice
title Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice
title_full Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice
title_fullStr Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice
title_short Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice
title_sort evaluation of an ai-based tb afb smear screening system for laboratory diagnosis on routine practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22218497
work_keys_str_mv AT fuhsiaoting evaluationofanaibasedtbafbsmearscreeningsystemforlaboratorydiagnosisonroutinepractice
AT tuhuizin evaluationofanaibasedtbafbsmearscreeningsystemforlaboratorydiagnosisonroutinepractice
AT leeherngsheng evaluationofanaibasedtbafbsmearscreeningsystemforlaboratorydiagnosisonroutinepractice
AT linyuseneason evaluationofanaibasedtbafbsmearscreeningsystemforlaboratorydiagnosisonroutinepractice
AT linchewei evaluationofanaibasedtbafbsmearscreeningsystemforlaboratorydiagnosisonroutinepractice