Cargando…

Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework

Indigenous people and communities are establishing social enterprises to address social disadvantage and overcome health inequities in their communities. This review sought to characterize the spectrum of Indigenous social enterprises in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States to ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudson, Sara, Foley, Dennis, Cargo, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478
_version_ 1784829770856398848
author Hudson, Sara
Foley, Dennis
Cargo, Margaret
author_facet Hudson, Sara
Foley, Dennis
Cargo, Margaret
author_sort Hudson, Sara
collection PubMed
description Indigenous people and communities are establishing social enterprises to address social disadvantage and overcome health inequities in their communities. This review sought to characterize the spectrum of Indigenous social enterprises in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States to identify the operational models and cultural values that underpin them and their impact on Indigenous health and wellbeing. The scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage methodological framework with recommended enhancements by Levac et al. underpinned by Indigenous Standpoint Theory, and an Indigenous advisory group to provide cultural oversight and direction. Of the 589 documents screened 115 documents were included in the review. A conceptual framework of seven different operational models of Indigenous social enterprises was developed based on differing levels of Indigenous ownership, control, and management: (1) individual, (2) collective, (3) delegative, (4) developmental, (5) supportive, (6) prescriptive and (7) paternalistic. Models with 100% Indigenous ownership and control were more likely to contribute to improved health and wellbeing by increasing self-determination and strengthening culture and promoting healing than others. Indigenous social enterprises could offer a more holistic and sustainable approach to health equity and health promotion than the siloed, programmatic model common in public health policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96577322022-11-15 Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework Hudson, Sara Foley, Dennis Cargo, Margaret Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Indigenous people and communities are establishing social enterprises to address social disadvantage and overcome health inequities in their communities. This review sought to characterize the spectrum of Indigenous social enterprises in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States to identify the operational models and cultural values that underpin them and their impact on Indigenous health and wellbeing. The scoping review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage methodological framework with recommended enhancements by Levac et al. underpinned by Indigenous Standpoint Theory, and an Indigenous advisory group to provide cultural oversight and direction. Of the 589 documents screened 115 documents were included in the review. A conceptual framework of seven different operational models of Indigenous social enterprises was developed based on differing levels of Indigenous ownership, control, and management: (1) individual, (2) collective, (3) delegative, (4) developmental, (5) supportive, (6) prescriptive and (7) paternalistic. Models with 100% Indigenous ownership and control were more likely to contribute to improved health and wellbeing by increasing self-determination and strengthening culture and promoting healing than others. Indigenous social enterprises could offer a more holistic and sustainable approach to health equity and health promotion than the siloed, programmatic model common in public health policy. MDPI 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9657732/ /pubmed/36361356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hudson, Sara
Foley, Dennis
Cargo, Margaret
Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework
title Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework
title_full Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework
title_fullStr Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework
title_short Indigenous Social Enterprises and Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Framework
title_sort indigenous social enterprises and health and wellbeing: a scoping review and conceptual framework
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114478
work_keys_str_mv AT hudsonsara indigenoussocialenterprisesandhealthandwellbeingascopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT foleydennis indigenoussocialenterprisesandhealthandwellbeingascopingreviewandconceptualframework
AT cargomargaret indigenoussocialenterprisesandhealthandwellbeingascopingreviewandconceptualframework