Cargando…

Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: To optimize surveillance for patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we sought to validate a previously published nomogram estimating post-SRS intracranial progression (IP) risk. Among 890 patients completing an initial SRS course across two institut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carpenter, David J., Natarajan, Brahma, Arshad, Muzamil, Natesan, Divya, Schultz, Olivia, Moravan, Michael J., Read, Charlotte, Lafata, Kyle J., Giles, Will, Fecci, Peter, Mullikin, Trey C., Reitman, Zachary J., Kirkpatrick, John P., Floyd, Scott R., Chmura, Steven J., Hong, Julian C., Salama, Joseph K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215186
_version_ 1784829773349912576
author Carpenter, David J.
Natarajan, Brahma
Arshad, Muzamil
Natesan, Divya
Schultz, Olivia
Moravan, Michael J.
Read, Charlotte
Lafata, Kyle J.
Giles, Will
Fecci, Peter
Mullikin, Trey C.
Reitman, Zachary J.
Kirkpatrick, John P.
Floyd, Scott R.
Chmura, Steven J.
Hong, Julian C.
Salama, Joseph K.
author_facet Carpenter, David J.
Natarajan, Brahma
Arshad, Muzamil
Natesan, Divya
Schultz, Olivia
Moravan, Michael J.
Read, Charlotte
Lafata, Kyle J.
Giles, Will
Fecci, Peter
Mullikin, Trey C.
Reitman, Zachary J.
Kirkpatrick, John P.
Floyd, Scott R.
Chmura, Steven J.
Hong, Julian C.
Salama, Joseph K.
author_sort Carpenter, David J.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: To optimize surveillance for patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we sought to validate a previously published nomogram estimating post-SRS intracranial progression (IP) risk. Among 890 patients completing an initial SRS course across two institutions 7/2017–12/2020, 53% were deemed high-risk for IP. Freedom from IP was superior for low-risk patients (p < 0.001), with a median of 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1–17.1 months) versus 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4–9.3 months) for high-risk patients. This large multisite cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick, simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP. ABSTRACT: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for many patients with brain metastases. To optimize post-SRS surveillance, this study aimed to validate a previously published nomogram predicting post-SRS intracranial progression (IP). We identified consecutive patients completing an initial course of SRS across two institutions between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients were classified as low- or high-risk for post-SRS IP per a previously published nomogram. Overall survival (OS) and freedom from IP (FFIP) were assessed via the Kaplan–Meier method. Assessment of parameters impacting FFIP was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Among 890 patients, median follow-up was 9.8 months (95% CI 9.1–11.2 months). In total, 47% had NSCLC primary tumors, and 47% had oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤5 metastastic foci) at the time of SRS. Per the IP nomogram, 53% of patients were deemed high-risk. For low- and high-risk patients, median FFIP was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1–17.1 months) and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4–9.3 months), respectively, and FFIP was superior in low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). This large multisite BM cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick and simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9657742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96577422022-11-15 Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study Carpenter, David J. Natarajan, Brahma Arshad, Muzamil Natesan, Divya Schultz, Olivia Moravan, Michael J. Read, Charlotte Lafata, Kyle J. Giles, Will Fecci, Peter Mullikin, Trey C. Reitman, Zachary J. Kirkpatrick, John P. Floyd, Scott R. Chmura, Steven J. Hong, Julian C. Salama, Joseph K. Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: To optimize surveillance for patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we sought to validate a previously published nomogram estimating post-SRS intracranial progression (IP) risk. Among 890 patients completing an initial SRS course across two institutions 7/2017–12/2020, 53% were deemed high-risk for IP. Freedom from IP was superior for low-risk patients (p < 0.001), with a median of 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1–17.1 months) versus 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4–9.3 months) for high-risk patients. This large multisite cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick, simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP. ABSTRACT: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for many patients with brain metastases. To optimize post-SRS surveillance, this study aimed to validate a previously published nomogram predicting post-SRS intracranial progression (IP). We identified consecutive patients completing an initial course of SRS across two institutions between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients were classified as low- or high-risk for post-SRS IP per a previously published nomogram. Overall survival (OS) and freedom from IP (FFIP) were assessed via the Kaplan–Meier method. Assessment of parameters impacting FFIP was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Among 890 patients, median follow-up was 9.8 months (95% CI 9.1–11.2 months). In total, 47% had NSCLC primary tumors, and 47% had oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤5 metastastic foci) at the time of SRS. Per the IP nomogram, 53% of patients were deemed high-risk. For low- and high-risk patients, median FFIP was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1–17.1 months) and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4–9.3 months), respectively, and FFIP was superior in low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). This large multisite BM cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick and simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP. MDPI 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9657742/ /pubmed/36358606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215186 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Carpenter, David J.
Natarajan, Brahma
Arshad, Muzamil
Natesan, Divya
Schultz, Olivia
Moravan, Michael J.
Read, Charlotte
Lafata, Kyle J.
Giles, Will
Fecci, Peter
Mullikin, Trey C.
Reitman, Zachary J.
Kirkpatrick, John P.
Floyd, Scott R.
Chmura, Steven J.
Hong, Julian C.
Salama, Joseph K.
Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study
title Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study
title_full Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study
title_fullStr Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study
title_short Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study
title_sort prognostic model for intracranial progression after stereotactic radiosurgery: a multicenter validation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9657742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36358606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215186
work_keys_str_mv AT carpenterdavidj prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT natarajanbrahma prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT arshadmuzamil prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT natesandivya prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT schultzolivia prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT moravanmichaelj prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT readcharlotte prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT lafatakylej prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT gileswill prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT feccipeter prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT mullikintreyc prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT reitmanzacharyj prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT kirkpatrickjohnp prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT floydscottr prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT chmurastevenj prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT hongjulianc prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy
AT salamajosephk prognosticmodelforintracranialprogressionafterstereotacticradiosurgeryamulticentervalidationstudy