Cargando…

Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation

The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montes, Álvaro, Sanmarco, Jéssica, Novo, Mercedes, Cea, Blanca, Arce, Ramón
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113852
_version_ 1784829934453129216
author Montes, Álvaro
Sanmarco, Jéssica
Novo, Mercedes
Cea, Blanca
Arce, Ramón
author_facet Montes, Álvaro
Sanmarco, Jéssica
Novo, Mercedes
Cea, Blanca
Arce, Ramón
author_sort Montes, Álvaro
collection PubMed
description The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardian. Thus, a meta-analytic review was undertaken with the aim of knowing the effect of bullying victimization on psychological harm, as well as quantifying the magnitude of the harm and estimating the probability that no harm associated with bullying victimization is generated. Method: A random-effects correlational meta-analysis correcting effect size by sampling error and criterion and predictor unreliability was performed. Results: The results exhibited a positive (i.e., more victimization and more psychological harm) and significant mean true effect size, implying an average psychological harm associated to bullying victimization of 29.7%. Nevertheless, 26.7% of students victimized by bullying did not develop psychological harm. Conclusions: Bullying victimization causes psychological harm, with an average increase in psychological harm associated with bullying victimization of 29.7%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9658371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96583712022-11-15 Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation Montes, Álvaro Sanmarco, Jéssica Novo, Mercedes Cea, Blanca Arce, Ramón Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardian. Thus, a meta-analytic review was undertaken with the aim of knowing the effect of bullying victimization on psychological harm, as well as quantifying the magnitude of the harm and estimating the probability that no harm associated with bullying victimization is generated. Method: A random-effects correlational meta-analysis correcting effect size by sampling error and criterion and predictor unreliability was performed. Results: The results exhibited a positive (i.e., more victimization and more psychological harm) and significant mean true effect size, implying an average psychological harm associated to bullying victimization of 29.7%. Nevertheless, 26.7% of students victimized by bullying did not develop psychological harm. Conclusions: Bullying victimization causes psychological harm, with an average increase in psychological harm associated with bullying victimization of 29.7%. MDPI 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9658371/ /pubmed/36360733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113852 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Montes, Álvaro
Sanmarco, Jéssica
Novo, Mercedes
Cea, Blanca
Arce, Ramón
Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
title Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
title_full Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
title_fullStr Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
title_short Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
title_sort estimating the psychological harm consequence of bullying victimization: a meta-analytic review for forensic evaluation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113852
work_keys_str_mv AT montesalvaro estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation
AT sanmarcojessica estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation
AT novomercedes estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation
AT ceablanca estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation
AT arceramon estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation