Cargando…
Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation
The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113852 |
_version_ | 1784829934453129216 |
---|---|
author | Montes, Álvaro Sanmarco, Jéssica Novo, Mercedes Cea, Blanca Arce, Ramón |
author_facet | Montes, Álvaro Sanmarco, Jéssica Novo, Mercedes Cea, Blanca Arce, Ramón |
author_sort | Montes, Álvaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardian. Thus, a meta-analytic review was undertaken with the aim of knowing the effect of bullying victimization on psychological harm, as well as quantifying the magnitude of the harm and estimating the probability that no harm associated with bullying victimization is generated. Method: A random-effects correlational meta-analysis correcting effect size by sampling error and criterion and predictor unreliability was performed. Results: The results exhibited a positive (i.e., more victimization and more psychological harm) and significant mean true effect size, implying an average psychological harm associated to bullying victimization of 29.7%. Nevertheless, 26.7% of students victimized by bullying did not develop psychological harm. Conclusions: Bullying victimization causes psychological harm, with an average increase in psychological harm associated with bullying victimization of 29.7%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9658371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96583712022-11-15 Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation Montes, Álvaro Sanmarco, Jéssica Novo, Mercedes Cea, Blanca Arce, Ramón Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The prevalence of traditional bullying victimization has been estimated at around 36%, while that of cyberbullying has been estimated at 15%. The victimization of bullying brings with it harm to mental health that must be compensated for, after a forensic evaluation, by the aggressor or legal guardian. Thus, a meta-analytic review was undertaken with the aim of knowing the effect of bullying victimization on psychological harm, as well as quantifying the magnitude of the harm and estimating the probability that no harm associated with bullying victimization is generated. Method: A random-effects correlational meta-analysis correcting effect size by sampling error and criterion and predictor unreliability was performed. Results: The results exhibited a positive (i.e., more victimization and more psychological harm) and significant mean true effect size, implying an average psychological harm associated to bullying victimization of 29.7%. Nevertheless, 26.7% of students victimized by bullying did not develop psychological harm. Conclusions: Bullying victimization causes psychological harm, with an average increase in psychological harm associated with bullying victimization of 29.7%. MDPI 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9658371/ /pubmed/36360733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113852 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Montes, Álvaro Sanmarco, Jéssica Novo, Mercedes Cea, Blanca Arce, Ramón Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation |
title | Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation |
title_full | Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation |
title_short | Estimating the Psychological Harm Consequence of Bullying Victimization: A Meta-Analytic Review for Forensic Evaluation |
title_sort | estimating the psychological harm consequence of bullying victimization: a meta-analytic review for forensic evaluation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36360733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montesalvaro estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation AT sanmarcojessica estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation AT novomercedes estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation AT ceablanca estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation AT arceramon estimatingthepsychologicalharmconsequenceofbullyingvictimizationametaanalyticreviewforforensicevaluation |