Cargando…

High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

The present study aimed to determine the effect of high intensity interval training (HIIT) in hypoxia on maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) compared with HIIT in normoxia with a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-accordant meta-analysis and meta-regression. Stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westmacott, Ailsa, Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M., McLaughlin, Marie, Mair, Jacqueline L., Hayes, Lawrence D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114261
_version_ 1784829941455519744
author Westmacott, Ailsa
Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M.
McLaughlin, Marie
Mair, Jacqueline L.
Hayes, Lawrence D.
author_facet Westmacott, Ailsa
Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M.
McLaughlin, Marie
Mair, Jacqueline L.
Hayes, Lawrence D.
author_sort Westmacott, Ailsa
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to determine the effect of high intensity interval training (HIIT) in hypoxia on maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) compared with HIIT in normoxia with a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-accordant meta-analysis and meta-regression. Studies which measured VO(2max) following a minimum of 2 weeks intervention featuring HIIT in hypoxia versus HIIT in normoxia were included. From 119 originally identified titles, nine studies were included (n = 194 participants). Meta-analysis was conducted on change in (∆) VO(2max) using standardised mean difference (SMD) and a random effects model. Meta-regression examined the relationship between the extent of environmental hypoxia (fractional inspired oxygen [FiO(2)]) and ∆VO(2max) and intervention duration and ∆VO(2max). The overall SMD for ∆VO(2max) following HIIT in hypoxia was 1.14 (95% CI = 0.56–1.72; p < 0.001). Meta-regressions identified no significant relationship between FiO(2) (coefficient estimate = 0.074, p = 0.852) or intervention duration (coefficient estimate = 0.071, p = 0.423) and ∆VO(2max). In conclusion, HIIT in hypoxia improved VO(2max) compared to HIIT in normoxia. Neither extent of hypoxia, nor training duration modified this effect, however the range in FiO(2) was small, which limits interpretation of this meta-regression. Moreover, training duration is not the only training variable known to influence ∆VO(2max), and does not appropriately capture total training stress or load. This meta-analysis provides pooled evidence that HIIT in hypoxia may be more efficacious at improving VO(2max) than HIIT in normoxia. The application of these data suggest adding a hypoxic stimuli to a period of HIIT may be more effective at improving VO(2max) than HIIT alone. Therefore, coaches and athletes with access to altitude (either natural or simulated) should consider implementing HIIT in hypoxia, rather than HIIT in normoxia where possible, assuming no negative side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9658399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96583992022-11-15 High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Westmacott, Ailsa Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M. McLaughlin, Marie Mair, Jacqueline L. Hayes, Lawrence D. Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review The present study aimed to determine the effect of high intensity interval training (HIIT) in hypoxia on maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) compared with HIIT in normoxia with a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-accordant meta-analysis and meta-regression. Studies which measured VO(2max) following a minimum of 2 weeks intervention featuring HIIT in hypoxia versus HIIT in normoxia were included. From 119 originally identified titles, nine studies were included (n = 194 participants). Meta-analysis was conducted on change in (∆) VO(2max) using standardised mean difference (SMD) and a random effects model. Meta-regression examined the relationship between the extent of environmental hypoxia (fractional inspired oxygen [FiO(2)]) and ∆VO(2max) and intervention duration and ∆VO(2max). The overall SMD for ∆VO(2max) following HIIT in hypoxia was 1.14 (95% CI = 0.56–1.72; p < 0.001). Meta-regressions identified no significant relationship between FiO(2) (coefficient estimate = 0.074, p = 0.852) or intervention duration (coefficient estimate = 0.071, p = 0.423) and ∆VO(2max). In conclusion, HIIT in hypoxia improved VO(2max) compared to HIIT in normoxia. Neither extent of hypoxia, nor training duration modified this effect, however the range in FiO(2) was small, which limits interpretation of this meta-regression. Moreover, training duration is not the only training variable known to influence ∆VO(2max), and does not appropriately capture total training stress or load. This meta-analysis provides pooled evidence that HIIT in hypoxia may be more efficacious at improving VO(2max) than HIIT in normoxia. The application of these data suggest adding a hypoxic stimuli to a period of HIIT may be more effective at improving VO(2max) than HIIT alone. Therefore, coaches and athletes with access to altitude (either natural or simulated) should consider implementing HIIT in hypoxia, rather than HIIT in normoxia where possible, assuming no negative side effects. MDPI 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9658399/ /pubmed/36361141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114261 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Westmacott, Ailsa
Sanal-Hayes, Nilihan E. M.
McLaughlin, Marie
Mair, Jacqueline L.
Hayes, Lawrence D.
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_full High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_fullStr High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_full_unstemmed High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_short High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Hypoxia Improves Maximal Aerobic Capacity More Than HIIT in Normoxia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_sort high-intensity interval training (hiit) in hypoxia improves maximal aerobic capacity more than hiit in normoxia: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36361141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114261
work_keys_str_mv AT westmacottailsa highintensityintervaltraininghiitinhypoxiaimprovesmaximalaerobiccapacitymorethanhiitinnormoxiaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT sanalhayesnilihanem highintensityintervaltraininghiitinhypoxiaimprovesmaximalaerobiccapacitymorethanhiitinnormoxiaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT mclaughlinmarie highintensityintervaltraininghiitinhypoxiaimprovesmaximalaerobiccapacitymorethanhiitinnormoxiaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT mairjacquelinel highintensityintervaltraininghiitinhypoxiaimprovesmaximalaerobiccapacitymorethanhiitinnormoxiaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT hayeslawrenced highintensityintervaltraininghiitinhypoxiaimprovesmaximalaerobiccapacitymorethanhiitinnormoxiaasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression