Cargando…

Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments

Breeding for Al tolerance is the most sustainable strategy to reduce yield losses caused by Al toxicity in plants. The use of rapid, cheap and reliable testing methods and environments enables breeders to make quick selection decisions. The objectives of this study were to (i) identify high dry matt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zishiri, Rutendo M., Mutengwa, Charles S., Kondwakwenda, Aleck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11212939
_version_ 1784830070403104768
author Zishiri, Rutendo M.
Mutengwa, Charles S.
Kondwakwenda, Aleck
author_facet Zishiri, Rutendo M.
Mutengwa, Charles S.
Kondwakwenda, Aleck
author_sort Zishiri, Rutendo M.
collection PubMed
description Breeding for Al tolerance is the most sustainable strategy to reduce yield losses caused by Al toxicity in plants. The use of rapid, cheap and reliable testing methods and environments enables breeders to make quick selection decisions. The objectives of this study were to (i) identify high dry matter yielding and stable quality protein maize (QPM) lines grown under Al toxic and optimum conditions and (ii) compare the discriminating power of laboratory- and greenhouse-based testing environments. A total of 75 tropical QPM inbred lines were tested at seedling stage for dry matter yield and stability under optimum and Al toxic growing conditions across six laboratory- and greenhouse-based environments. The nutrient solution method was used for the laboratory trials, while the soil bioassay method was used for the greenhouse trials. A yield loss of 55% due to Al toxicity was observed, confirming the adverse effects of Al toxicity on maize productivity. The ANOVA revealed the presence of genetic variation among the set of genotypes used in this study, which can be exploited through plant breeding. Seventeen stable and high-yielding lines were identified and recommended. Greenhouse-based environments were more discriminating than laboratory environments. Therefore, we concluded that greenhouse environments are more informative than laboratory environments when testing genotypes for Al tolerance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9658909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96589092022-11-15 Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments Zishiri, Rutendo M. Mutengwa, Charles S. Kondwakwenda, Aleck Plants (Basel) Article Breeding for Al tolerance is the most sustainable strategy to reduce yield losses caused by Al toxicity in plants. The use of rapid, cheap and reliable testing methods and environments enables breeders to make quick selection decisions. The objectives of this study were to (i) identify high dry matter yielding and stable quality protein maize (QPM) lines grown under Al toxic and optimum conditions and (ii) compare the discriminating power of laboratory- and greenhouse-based testing environments. A total of 75 tropical QPM inbred lines were tested at seedling stage for dry matter yield and stability under optimum and Al toxic growing conditions across six laboratory- and greenhouse-based environments. The nutrient solution method was used for the laboratory trials, while the soil bioassay method was used for the greenhouse trials. A yield loss of 55% due to Al toxicity was observed, confirming the adverse effects of Al toxicity on maize productivity. The ANOVA revealed the presence of genetic variation among the set of genotypes used in this study, which can be exploited through plant breeding. Seventeen stable and high-yielding lines were identified and recommended. Greenhouse-based environments were more discriminating than laboratory environments. Therefore, we concluded that greenhouse environments are more informative than laboratory environments when testing genotypes for Al tolerance. MDPI 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9658909/ /pubmed/36365391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11212939 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zishiri, Rutendo M.
Mutengwa, Charles S.
Kondwakwenda, Aleck
Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments
title Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments
title_full Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments
title_fullStr Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments
title_full_unstemmed Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments
title_short Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments
title_sort dry matter yield stability analysis of maize genotypes grown in al toxic and optimum controlled environments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9658909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36365391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11212939
work_keys_str_mv AT zishirirutendom drymatteryieldstabilityanalysisofmaizegenotypesgrowninaltoxicandoptimumcontrolledenvironments
AT mutengwacharless drymatteryieldstabilityanalysisofmaizegenotypesgrowninaltoxicandoptimumcontrolledenvironments
AT kondwakwendaaleck drymatteryieldstabilityanalysisofmaizegenotypesgrowninaltoxicandoptimumcontrolledenvironments