Cargando…
Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models
Background: Monkeypox virus is gaining attention due to its severity and spread among people. This study sheds light on the modeling and forecasting of new monkeypox cases. Knowledge about the future situation of the virus using a more accurate time series and stochastic models is required for futur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9659136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216555 |
_version_ | 1784830126874165248 |
---|---|
author | Qureshi, Moiz Khan, Shahid Bantan, Rashad A. R. Daniyal, Muhammad Elgarhy, Mohammed Marzo, Roy Rillera Lin, Yulan |
author_facet | Qureshi, Moiz Khan, Shahid Bantan, Rashad A. R. Daniyal, Muhammad Elgarhy, Mohammed Marzo, Roy Rillera Lin, Yulan |
author_sort | Qureshi, Moiz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Monkeypox virus is gaining attention due to its severity and spread among people. This study sheds light on the modeling and forecasting of new monkeypox cases. Knowledge about the future situation of the virus using a more accurate time series and stochastic models is required for future actions and plans to cope with the challenge. Methods: We conduct a side-by-side comparison of the machine learning approach with the traditional time series model. The multilayer perceptron model (MLP), a machine learning technique, and the Box–Jenkins methodology, also known as the ARIMA model, are used for classical modeling. Both methods are applied to the Monkeypox cumulative data set and compared using different model selection criteria such as root mean square error, mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. Results: With a root mean square error of 150.78, the monkeypox series follows the ARIMA (7,1,7) model among the other potential models. Comparatively, we use the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, which employs the sigmoid activation function and has a different number of hidden neurons in a single hidden layer. The root mean square error of the MLP model, which uses a single input and ten hidden neurons, is 54.40, significantly lower than that of the ARIMA model. The actual confirmed cases versus estimated or fitted plots also demonstrate that the multilayer perceptron model has a better fit for the monkeypox data than the ARIMA model. Conclusions and Recommendation: When it comes to predicting monkeypox, the machine learning method outperforms the traditional time series. A better match can be achieved in future studies by applying the extreme learning machine model (ELM), support vector machine (SVM), and some other methods with various activation functions. It is thus concluded that the selected data provide a real picture of the virus. If the situations remain the same, governments and other stockholders should ensure the follow-up of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) among the masses, as the trends will continue rising in the upcoming 10 days. However, governments should take some serious interventions to cope with the virus. Limitation: In the ARIMA models selected for forecasting, we did not incorporate the effect of covariates such as the effect of net migration of monkeypox virus patients, government interventions, etc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9659136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96591362022-11-15 Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models Qureshi, Moiz Khan, Shahid Bantan, Rashad A. R. Daniyal, Muhammad Elgarhy, Mohammed Marzo, Roy Rillera Lin, Yulan J Clin Med Article Background: Monkeypox virus is gaining attention due to its severity and spread among people. This study sheds light on the modeling and forecasting of new monkeypox cases. Knowledge about the future situation of the virus using a more accurate time series and stochastic models is required for future actions and plans to cope with the challenge. Methods: We conduct a side-by-side comparison of the machine learning approach with the traditional time series model. The multilayer perceptron model (MLP), a machine learning technique, and the Box–Jenkins methodology, also known as the ARIMA model, are used for classical modeling. Both methods are applied to the Monkeypox cumulative data set and compared using different model selection criteria such as root mean square error, mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. Results: With a root mean square error of 150.78, the monkeypox series follows the ARIMA (7,1,7) model among the other potential models. Comparatively, we use the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, which employs the sigmoid activation function and has a different number of hidden neurons in a single hidden layer. The root mean square error of the MLP model, which uses a single input and ten hidden neurons, is 54.40, significantly lower than that of the ARIMA model. The actual confirmed cases versus estimated or fitted plots also demonstrate that the multilayer perceptron model has a better fit for the monkeypox data than the ARIMA model. Conclusions and Recommendation: When it comes to predicting monkeypox, the machine learning method outperforms the traditional time series. A better match can be achieved in future studies by applying the extreme learning machine model (ELM), support vector machine (SVM), and some other methods with various activation functions. It is thus concluded that the selected data provide a real picture of the virus. If the situations remain the same, governments and other stockholders should ensure the follow-up of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) among the masses, as the trends will continue rising in the upcoming 10 days. However, governments should take some serious interventions to cope with the virus. Limitation: In the ARIMA models selected for forecasting, we did not incorporate the effect of covariates such as the effect of net migration of monkeypox virus patients, government interventions, etc. MDPI 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9659136/ /pubmed/36362783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216555 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Qureshi, Moiz Khan, Shahid Bantan, Rashad A. R. Daniyal, Muhammad Elgarhy, Mohammed Marzo, Roy Rillera Lin, Yulan Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models |
title | Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models |
title_full | Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models |
title_fullStr | Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models |
title_short | Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models |
title_sort | modeling and forecasting monkeypox cases using stochastic models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9659136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qureshimoiz modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels AT khanshahid modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels AT bantanrashadar modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels AT daniyalmuhammad modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels AT elgarhymohammed modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels AT marzoroyrillera modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels AT linyulan modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels |