Cargando…

Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models

Background: Monkeypox virus is gaining attention due to its severity and spread among people. This study sheds light on the modeling and forecasting of new monkeypox cases. Knowledge about the future situation of the virus using a more accurate time series and stochastic models is required for futur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qureshi, Moiz, Khan, Shahid, Bantan, Rashad A. R., Daniyal, Muhammad, Elgarhy, Mohammed, Marzo, Roy Rillera, Lin, Yulan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9659136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216555
_version_ 1784830126874165248
author Qureshi, Moiz
Khan, Shahid
Bantan, Rashad A. R.
Daniyal, Muhammad
Elgarhy, Mohammed
Marzo, Roy Rillera
Lin, Yulan
author_facet Qureshi, Moiz
Khan, Shahid
Bantan, Rashad A. R.
Daniyal, Muhammad
Elgarhy, Mohammed
Marzo, Roy Rillera
Lin, Yulan
author_sort Qureshi, Moiz
collection PubMed
description Background: Monkeypox virus is gaining attention due to its severity and spread among people. This study sheds light on the modeling and forecasting of new monkeypox cases. Knowledge about the future situation of the virus using a more accurate time series and stochastic models is required for future actions and plans to cope with the challenge. Methods: We conduct a side-by-side comparison of the machine learning approach with the traditional time series model. The multilayer perceptron model (MLP), a machine learning technique, and the Box–Jenkins methodology, also known as the ARIMA model, are used for classical modeling. Both methods are applied to the Monkeypox cumulative data set and compared using different model selection criteria such as root mean square error, mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. Results: With a root mean square error of 150.78, the monkeypox series follows the ARIMA (7,1,7) model among the other potential models. Comparatively, we use the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, which employs the sigmoid activation function and has a different number of hidden neurons in a single hidden layer. The root mean square error of the MLP model, which uses a single input and ten hidden neurons, is 54.40, significantly lower than that of the ARIMA model. The actual confirmed cases versus estimated or fitted plots also demonstrate that the multilayer perceptron model has a better fit for the monkeypox data than the ARIMA model. Conclusions and Recommendation: When it comes to predicting monkeypox, the machine learning method outperforms the traditional time series. A better match can be achieved in future studies by applying the extreme learning machine model (ELM), support vector machine (SVM), and some other methods with various activation functions. It is thus concluded that the selected data provide a real picture of the virus. If the situations remain the same, governments and other stockholders should ensure the follow-up of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) among the masses, as the trends will continue rising in the upcoming 10 days. However, governments should take some serious interventions to cope with the virus. Limitation: In the ARIMA models selected for forecasting, we did not incorporate the effect of covariates such as the effect of net migration of monkeypox virus patients, government interventions, etc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9659136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96591362022-11-15 Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models Qureshi, Moiz Khan, Shahid Bantan, Rashad A. R. Daniyal, Muhammad Elgarhy, Mohammed Marzo, Roy Rillera Lin, Yulan J Clin Med Article Background: Monkeypox virus is gaining attention due to its severity and spread among people. This study sheds light on the modeling and forecasting of new monkeypox cases. Knowledge about the future situation of the virus using a more accurate time series and stochastic models is required for future actions and plans to cope with the challenge. Methods: We conduct a side-by-side comparison of the machine learning approach with the traditional time series model. The multilayer perceptron model (MLP), a machine learning technique, and the Box–Jenkins methodology, also known as the ARIMA model, are used for classical modeling. Both methods are applied to the Monkeypox cumulative data set and compared using different model selection criteria such as root mean square error, mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error. Results: With a root mean square error of 150.78, the monkeypox series follows the ARIMA (7,1,7) model among the other potential models. Comparatively, we use the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model, which employs the sigmoid activation function and has a different number of hidden neurons in a single hidden layer. The root mean square error of the MLP model, which uses a single input and ten hidden neurons, is 54.40, significantly lower than that of the ARIMA model. The actual confirmed cases versus estimated or fitted plots also demonstrate that the multilayer perceptron model has a better fit for the monkeypox data than the ARIMA model. Conclusions and Recommendation: When it comes to predicting monkeypox, the machine learning method outperforms the traditional time series. A better match can be achieved in future studies by applying the extreme learning machine model (ELM), support vector machine (SVM), and some other methods with various activation functions. It is thus concluded that the selected data provide a real picture of the virus. If the situations remain the same, governments and other stockholders should ensure the follow-up of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) among the masses, as the trends will continue rising in the upcoming 10 days. However, governments should take some serious interventions to cope with the virus. Limitation: In the ARIMA models selected for forecasting, we did not incorporate the effect of covariates such as the effect of net migration of monkeypox virus patients, government interventions, etc. MDPI 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9659136/ /pubmed/36362783 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216555 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Qureshi, Moiz
Khan, Shahid
Bantan, Rashad A. R.
Daniyal, Muhammad
Elgarhy, Mohammed
Marzo, Roy Rillera
Lin, Yulan
Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models
title Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models
title_full Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models
title_fullStr Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models
title_full_unstemmed Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models
title_short Modeling and Forecasting Monkeypox Cases Using Stochastic Models
title_sort modeling and forecasting monkeypox cases using stochastic models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9659136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36362783
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216555
work_keys_str_mv AT qureshimoiz modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels
AT khanshahid modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels
AT bantanrashadar modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels
AT daniyalmuhammad modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels
AT elgarhymohammed modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels
AT marzoroyrillera modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels
AT linyulan modelingandforecastingmonkeypoxcasesusingstochasticmodels