Cargando…

Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients

BACKGROUND: Macrophages, the major immune cells in glioma microenvironment, are closely related to tumor prognosis. Further studies are needed to investigate macrophages, which will be helpful to fully understand the role of it and early achieve clinical translation. METHODS: A total of 1334 glioma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yangyang, Liu, Yan, Zhang, Chengkai, Zhang, Chuanbao, Guan, Xiudong, Jia, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9659848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1028937
_version_ 1784830290323046400
author Wang, Yangyang
Liu, Yan
Zhang, Chengkai
Zhang, Chuanbao
Guan, Xiudong
Jia, Wang
author_facet Wang, Yangyang
Liu, Yan
Zhang, Chengkai
Zhang, Chuanbao
Guan, Xiudong
Jia, Wang
author_sort Wang, Yangyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Macrophages, the major immune cells in glioma microenvironment, are closely related to tumor prognosis. Further studies are needed to investigate macrophages, which will be helpful to fully understand the role of it and early achieve clinical translation. METHODS: A total of 1334 glioma cases were enrolled in this study from 3 databases. In our works, the single cell cohorts from GSE89567, GSE84465, and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) datasets were used to analyze the key genes of macrophage. The bulk sequencing data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and CGGA datasets were respectively divided into the training set and validation set to test prognostic value of the key genes from single cell analysis. RESULTS: Quantitative and functional differences significantly emerge in macrophage clusters between LGG and GBM. Firstly, we used the Seurat R package to identify 281 genes differentially expressed genes in macrophage clusters between LGG and GBM. Furthermore, based on these genes, we developed a predictive risk model to predict prognosis and reflect the immune microenvironment in glioma. The risk score calculation formula was yielded as follows: Risk score = (0.11 × EXP(MACC1)) + (−0.31 × EXP(OTUD1)) + (−0.09 × EXP(TCHH)) + (0.26 × EXP(ADPRH)) + (-0.40× EXP(ABCG2)) + (0.21 × EXP(PLBD1)) + (0.12 × EXP(ANG)) + (0.29 × EXP(QPCT)). The risk score was independently related to prognosis. Further, significant differences existed in immunological characteristics between the low- and high-risk score groups. What is more, mutation analysis found different genomic patterns associated with the risk score. CONCLUSION: This study further confirms that the proportion of macrophage infiltration is not only significantly different, but the function of them is also different. The signature, identified from the differentially expressed macrophage-related genes impacts poor prognosis and short overall survival and may act as therapeutic targets in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9659848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96598482022-11-15 Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients Wang, Yangyang Liu, Yan Zhang, Chengkai Zhang, Chuanbao Guan, Xiudong Jia, Wang Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Macrophages, the major immune cells in glioma microenvironment, are closely related to tumor prognosis. Further studies are needed to investigate macrophages, which will be helpful to fully understand the role of it and early achieve clinical translation. METHODS: A total of 1334 glioma cases were enrolled in this study from 3 databases. In our works, the single cell cohorts from GSE89567, GSE84465, and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) datasets were used to analyze the key genes of macrophage. The bulk sequencing data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and CGGA datasets were respectively divided into the training set and validation set to test prognostic value of the key genes from single cell analysis. RESULTS: Quantitative and functional differences significantly emerge in macrophage clusters between LGG and GBM. Firstly, we used the Seurat R package to identify 281 genes differentially expressed genes in macrophage clusters between LGG and GBM. Furthermore, based on these genes, we developed a predictive risk model to predict prognosis and reflect the immune microenvironment in glioma. The risk score calculation formula was yielded as follows: Risk score = (0.11 × EXP(MACC1)) + (−0.31 × EXP(OTUD1)) + (−0.09 × EXP(TCHH)) + (0.26 × EXP(ADPRH)) + (-0.40× EXP(ABCG2)) + (0.21 × EXP(PLBD1)) + (0.12 × EXP(ANG)) + (0.29 × EXP(QPCT)). The risk score was independently related to prognosis. Further, significant differences existed in immunological characteristics between the low- and high-risk score groups. What is more, mutation analysis found different genomic patterns associated with the risk score. CONCLUSION: This study further confirms that the proportion of macrophage infiltration is not only significantly different, but the function of them is also different. The signature, identified from the differentially expressed macrophage-related genes impacts poor prognosis and short overall survival and may act as therapeutic targets in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9659848/ /pubmed/36389681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1028937 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Liu, Zhang, Zhang, Guan and Jia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Wang, Yangyang
Liu, Yan
Zhang, Chengkai
Zhang, Chuanbao
Guan, Xiudong
Jia, Wang
Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients
title Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients
title_full Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients
title_fullStr Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients
title_full_unstemmed Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients
title_short Differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients
title_sort differences of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment as an underlying key factor in glioma patients
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9659848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1028937
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyangyang differencesofmacrophagesinthetumormicroenvironmentasanunderlyingkeyfactoringliomapatients
AT liuyan differencesofmacrophagesinthetumormicroenvironmentasanunderlyingkeyfactoringliomapatients
AT zhangchengkai differencesofmacrophagesinthetumormicroenvironmentasanunderlyingkeyfactoringliomapatients
AT zhangchuanbao differencesofmacrophagesinthetumormicroenvironmentasanunderlyingkeyfactoringliomapatients
AT guanxiudong differencesofmacrophagesinthetumormicroenvironmentasanunderlyingkeyfactoringliomapatients
AT jiawang differencesofmacrophagesinthetumormicroenvironmentasanunderlyingkeyfactoringliomapatients