Cargando…

Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer, allowing preoperative down-staging of the primary tumor to facilitate complete surgical removal. However, further investigation is warranted for identifying whether radiotherapy is necessary for rectal mucin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Biao, Wu, Ketong, Li, Jiao, Wu, Qianyu, Wu, Yue, Wang, Xinhua, Linghu, Yu, Hu, Huabin, Wang, Huaiming, Cao, Wuteng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388693
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-22-817
_version_ 1784830343844462592
author Li, Biao
Wu, Ketong
Li, Jiao
Wu, Qianyu
Wu, Yue
Wang, Xinhua
Linghu, Yu
Hu, Huabin
Wang, Huaiming
Cao, Wuteng
author_facet Li, Biao
Wu, Ketong
Li, Jiao
Wu, Qianyu
Wu, Yue
Wang, Xinhua
Linghu, Yu
Hu, Huabin
Wang, Huaiming
Cao, Wuteng
author_sort Li, Biao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer, allowing preoperative down-staging of the primary tumor to facilitate complete surgical removal. However, further investigation is warranted for identifying whether radiotherapy is necessary for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMAC). Thus, this study was designed to explore the relationship between mFOLFOX6 with or without preoperative radiotherapy and therapeutic efficacy in locally advanced RMAC. METHODS: A total of 81 patients were retrospectively enrolled, with MRI-defined clinical stage II/III RMAC received neoadjuvant treatment with mFOLFOX6 alone (group A) or mFOLFOX6 plus radiation (group B), followed by total mesorectal excision. Tumor down-staging and tumor response were assessed based on post-treatment MRI-defined radiographical and pathological findings. Follow-up data were retrieved, and the Kaplan-Meier curve was used to determine the relationship between the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical baseline characteristics of patients between group A and group B. The sphincter preservation rate in group B was 60.9%, higher than in group A (20.0%) (P=0.031). The rate of pathological complete response (pCR) was 14.0% in group B, while no patients had pCR in group A (P=0.029), and the tumor response rate in group B was higher than in group A (52.0% vs. 16.1%, P=0.001). The 3-year probability of OS in group A and B was 77.4% and 72.0% (P=0.509), and 3-year DFS was 58.1% and 56.0% (P=0.592), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6-based chemoradiotherapy could be a promising therapeutic option for patients with RMAC, which was associated with a high rate of pCR and sphincter preservation in comparison to treated with mFOLFOX6 alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9660069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96600692022-11-15 Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary? Li, Biao Wu, Ketong Li, Jiao Wu, Qianyu Wu, Yue Wang, Xinhua Linghu, Yu Hu, Huabin Wang, Huaiming Cao, Wuteng J Gastrointest Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer, allowing preoperative down-staging of the primary tumor to facilitate complete surgical removal. However, further investigation is warranted for identifying whether radiotherapy is necessary for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMAC). Thus, this study was designed to explore the relationship between mFOLFOX6 with or without preoperative radiotherapy and therapeutic efficacy in locally advanced RMAC. METHODS: A total of 81 patients were retrospectively enrolled, with MRI-defined clinical stage II/III RMAC received neoadjuvant treatment with mFOLFOX6 alone (group A) or mFOLFOX6 plus radiation (group B), followed by total mesorectal excision. Tumor down-staging and tumor response were assessed based on post-treatment MRI-defined radiographical and pathological findings. Follow-up data were retrieved, and the Kaplan-Meier curve was used to determine the relationship between the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical baseline characteristics of patients between group A and group B. The sphincter preservation rate in group B was 60.9%, higher than in group A (20.0%) (P=0.031). The rate of pathological complete response (pCR) was 14.0% in group B, while no patients had pCR in group A (P=0.029), and the tumor response rate in group B was higher than in group A (52.0% vs. 16.1%, P=0.001). The 3-year probability of OS in group A and B was 77.4% and 72.0% (P=0.509), and 3-year DFS was 58.1% and 56.0% (P=0.592), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6-based chemoradiotherapy could be a promising therapeutic option for patients with RMAC, which was associated with a high rate of pCR and sphincter preservation in comparison to treated with mFOLFOX6 alone. AME Publishing Company 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9660069/ /pubmed/36388693 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-22-817 Text en 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Biao
Wu, Ketong
Li, Jiao
Wu, Qianyu
Wu, Yue
Wang, Xinhua
Linghu, Yu
Hu, Huabin
Wang, Huaiming
Cao, Wuteng
Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?
title Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?
title_full Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?
title_fullStr Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?
title_short Locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?
title_sort locally advanced rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: is preoperative radiation necessary?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388693
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-22-817
work_keys_str_mv AT libiao locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT wuketong locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT lijiao locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT wuqianyu locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT wuyue locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT wangxinhua locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT linghuyu locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT huhuabin locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT wanghuaiming locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary
AT caowuteng locallyadvancedrectalmucinousadenocarcinomaispreoperativeradiationnecessary