Cargando…

Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle

CATEGORY: Ankle; Sports INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The Broström procedure is indicated for lateral ankle instability in the setting of acute or chronic ankle sprains, with injury of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) being the most common. While the procedure is anatomically favorable, one disadvan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Comfort, Spencer M., Duncan, Parker P., Dornan, Grant J., Haytmanek, C. Thomas, Clanton, Thomas O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660380/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00634
_version_ 1784830400135168000
author Comfort, Spencer M.
Duncan, Parker P.
Dornan, Grant J.
Haytmanek, C. Thomas
Clanton, Thomas O.
author_facet Comfort, Spencer M.
Duncan, Parker P.
Dornan, Grant J.
Haytmanek, C. Thomas
Clanton, Thomas O.
author_sort Comfort, Spencer M.
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Ankle; Sports INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The Broström procedure is indicated for lateral ankle instability in the setting of acute or chronic ankle sprains, with injury of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) being the most common. While the procedure is anatomically favorable, one disadvantage of the Broström procedure is significantly reduced strength of the repair when compared with the native ligament. Broström repair with augmentation of an InternalBrace (Arthrex, Naples, FL), nonabsorbable suture tape fixed directly to the bone, has demonstrated increased strength and stiffness of the repaired ATFL; however, there is a paucity of literature published on clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes following treatment of ATFL injuries with Broström repair alone versus Broström repair with InternalBrace augmentation. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2017, patients 18-75 years old who underwent surgical treatment for an ATFL injury of the lateral ankle injury with either a Broström repair alone (Cohort A) or Broström repair with InternalBrace augmentation (Cohort B) performed by two surgeons (TOC or CTH) and at least 2 years post-operative were identified. Minimum 2-year follow-up was obtained with patients completing subjective questionnaires including Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport subscales, Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS), Tegner activity scale, and patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Demographics and patient-reported outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients were included in the study. Cohort A had 54 patients (29 females) with median age of 32 (range: 19 to 68) and 49 of 54 patients (91%) completed follow-up at an median of 2.32 years (range: 2 to 12 years). Cohort B had 49 patients (29 females) with median age of 37 (range: 18 to 66) and 38 of 49 patients (78%) completed follow-up at an median of 3.07 years (range 2 to 7 years). There was no significant difference in age or sex between cohorts (p>0.05 for all). At earliest minimum 2-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in median post-operative FAAM ADL (97% vs 98%, p=0. 979), FAAM Sport (91% vs 91%, p=0.976), SF-12 PCS (56 vs 54, p=0.143), SF-12 MCS (56.6 vs 57.0, p=0.155), Tegner score (6 vs 5, p=0.214), or patient satisfaction (9 vs 9, p=0.781). CONCLUSION: Patients treated for ATFL injury of the lateral ankle with Broström repair with InternalBrace augmentation demonstrated similar clinical outcomes to those treated with Broström repair alone. With its advantages in strength and stiffness, the InternalBrace should be considered when treating lateral ankle instability in the setting of ligamentous injury since it allowed an earlier return to full weight bearing and a quicker rehabilitation protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9660380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96603802022-11-15 Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle Comfort, Spencer M. Duncan, Parker P. Dornan, Grant J. Haytmanek, C. Thomas Clanton, Thomas O. Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Ankle; Sports INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: The Broström procedure is indicated for lateral ankle instability in the setting of acute or chronic ankle sprains, with injury of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) being the most common. While the procedure is anatomically favorable, one disadvantage of the Broström procedure is significantly reduced strength of the repair when compared with the native ligament. Broström repair with augmentation of an InternalBrace (Arthrex, Naples, FL), nonabsorbable suture tape fixed directly to the bone, has demonstrated increased strength and stiffness of the repaired ATFL; however, there is a paucity of literature published on clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes following treatment of ATFL injuries with Broström repair alone versus Broström repair with InternalBrace augmentation. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2017, patients 18-75 years old who underwent surgical treatment for an ATFL injury of the lateral ankle injury with either a Broström repair alone (Cohort A) or Broström repair with InternalBrace augmentation (Cohort B) performed by two surgeons (TOC or CTH) and at least 2 years post-operative were identified. Minimum 2-year follow-up was obtained with patients completing subjective questionnaires including Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport subscales, Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS), Tegner activity scale, and patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Demographics and patient-reported outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients were included in the study. Cohort A had 54 patients (29 females) with median age of 32 (range: 19 to 68) and 49 of 54 patients (91%) completed follow-up at an median of 2.32 years (range: 2 to 12 years). Cohort B had 49 patients (29 females) with median age of 37 (range: 18 to 66) and 38 of 49 patients (78%) completed follow-up at an median of 3.07 years (range 2 to 7 years). There was no significant difference in age or sex between cohorts (p>0.05 for all). At earliest minimum 2-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in median post-operative FAAM ADL (97% vs 98%, p=0. 979), FAAM Sport (91% vs 91%, p=0.976), SF-12 PCS (56 vs 54, p=0.143), SF-12 MCS (56.6 vs 57.0, p=0.155), Tegner score (6 vs 5, p=0.214), or patient satisfaction (9 vs 9, p=0.781). CONCLUSION: Patients treated for ATFL injury of the lateral ankle with Broström repair with InternalBrace augmentation demonstrated similar clinical outcomes to those treated with Broström repair alone. With its advantages in strength and stiffness, the InternalBrace should be considered when treating lateral ankle instability in the setting of ligamentous injury since it allowed an earlier return to full weight bearing and a quicker rehabilitation protocol. SAGE Publications 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9660380/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00634 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Comfort, Spencer M.
Duncan, Parker P.
Dornan, Grant J.
Haytmanek, C. Thomas
Clanton, Thomas O.
Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle
title Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle
title_full Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle
title_fullStr Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle
title_short Outcomes Following Broström Repair with Internalbrace Ligament Augmentation vs Broström Repair Alone for the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury of the Lateral Ankle
title_sort outcomes following broström repair with internalbrace ligament augmentation vs broström repair alone for the treatment of anterior talofibular ligament injury of the lateral ankle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660380/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00634
work_keys_str_mv AT comfortspencerm outcomesfollowingbrostromrepairwithinternalbraceligamentaugmentationvsbrostromrepairaloneforthetreatmentofanteriortalofibularligamentinjuryofthelateralankle
AT duncanparkerp outcomesfollowingbrostromrepairwithinternalbraceligamentaugmentationvsbrostromrepairaloneforthetreatmentofanteriortalofibularligamentinjuryofthelateralankle
AT dornangrantj outcomesfollowingbrostromrepairwithinternalbraceligamentaugmentationvsbrostromrepairaloneforthetreatmentofanteriortalofibularligamentinjuryofthelateralankle
AT haytmanekcthomas outcomesfollowingbrostromrepairwithinternalbraceligamentaugmentationvsbrostromrepairaloneforthetreatmentofanteriortalofibularligamentinjuryofthelateralankle
AT clantonthomaso outcomesfollowingbrostromrepairwithinternalbraceligamentaugmentationvsbrostromrepairaloneforthetreatmentofanteriortalofibularligamentinjuryofthelateralankle