Cargando…

Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review

CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc injuries range from sprains to fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints which include injury to the Lisfranc ligament complex. Most require surgical intervention. However, apparently stable injuries can be managed nonoperat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guerreiro, Fransiska, Abdelaziz, Ahmed, Ponugoti, Nikhil, Marsland, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660437/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00680
_version_ 1784830406157139968
author Guerreiro, Fransiska
Abdelaziz, Ahmed
Ponugoti, Nikhil
Marsland, Daniel
author_facet Guerreiro, Fransiska
Abdelaziz, Ahmed
Ponugoti, Nikhil
Marsland, Daniel
author_sort Guerreiro, Fransiska
collection PubMed
description CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc injuries range from sprains to fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints which include injury to the Lisfranc ligament complex. Most require surgical intervention. However, apparently stable injuries can be managed nonoperatively. The aims of the current study were to perform a systematic review of outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registered, a review was performed of the literature (2000 - 2021) reporting Lisfranc injuries considered to be stable and initially managed nonoperatively. Following exclusions, 8 papers were identified; 1 prospective and 7 retrospective studies. A total of 220 patients were studied with a mean age of 39.8 years and mean follow up of 4.3 years. Outcomes included function, displacement, rates of surgery and secondary osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Four papers reported good outcomes, with adjusted functional scores ranging from of 82.6 to 100 (out of 100). However, poor outcomes were frequently reported. One paper reported that late displacement occurred in 54% of patients. Surgical intervention was required in 12.2 to 55.6% of patients. Rates of secondary osteoarthritis were 4.9 to 37.5%. Two papers directly compared operative to non-operative treatment. In an injury matched cohort, superior outcomes were reported in the surgical arm. Numerous limitations were identified, including a lack of consensus on what constitutes a stable injury. Furthermore, wide heterogeneity was identified due to use of different classification systems, PROMS, investigation modalities and treatment protocols. CONCLUSION: Reported outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries vary widely, including high rates of conversion to surgery. There is no agreed definition of what a stable Lisfranc injury is, and no agreed treatment protocol. With the advantage of modern imaging techniques, prospective research is needed to determine which Lisfranc injuries can be safely treated nonoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9660437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96604372022-11-15 Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review Guerreiro, Fransiska Abdelaziz, Ahmed Ponugoti, Nikhil Marsland, Daniel Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc injuries range from sprains to fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints which include injury to the Lisfranc ligament complex. Most require surgical intervention. However, apparently stable injuries can be managed nonoperatively. The aims of the current study were to perform a systematic review of outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registered, a review was performed of the literature (2000 - 2021) reporting Lisfranc injuries considered to be stable and initially managed nonoperatively. Following exclusions, 8 papers were identified; 1 prospective and 7 retrospective studies. A total of 220 patients were studied with a mean age of 39.8 years and mean follow up of 4.3 years. Outcomes included function, displacement, rates of surgery and secondary osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Four papers reported good outcomes, with adjusted functional scores ranging from of 82.6 to 100 (out of 100). However, poor outcomes were frequently reported. One paper reported that late displacement occurred in 54% of patients. Surgical intervention was required in 12.2 to 55.6% of patients. Rates of secondary osteoarthritis were 4.9 to 37.5%. Two papers directly compared operative to non-operative treatment. In an injury matched cohort, superior outcomes were reported in the surgical arm. Numerous limitations were identified, including a lack of consensus on what constitutes a stable injury. Furthermore, wide heterogeneity was identified due to use of different classification systems, PROMS, investigation modalities and treatment protocols. CONCLUSION: Reported outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries vary widely, including high rates of conversion to surgery. There is no agreed definition of what a stable Lisfranc injury is, and no agreed treatment protocol. With the advantage of modern imaging techniques, prospective research is needed to determine which Lisfranc injuries can be safely treated nonoperatively. SAGE Publications 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9660437/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00680 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Guerreiro, Fransiska
Abdelaziz, Ahmed
Ponugoti, Nikhil
Marsland, Daniel
Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review
title Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review
title_full Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review
title_short Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review
title_sort conservative management of lisfranc injury: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660437/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00680
work_keys_str_mv AT guerreirofransiska conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview
AT abdelazizahmed conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview
AT ponugotinikhil conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview
AT marslanddaniel conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview