Cargando…
Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review
CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc injuries range from sprains to fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints which include injury to the Lisfranc ligament complex. Most require surgical intervention. However, apparently stable injuries can be managed nonoperat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660437/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00680 |
_version_ | 1784830406157139968 |
---|---|
author | Guerreiro, Fransiska Abdelaziz, Ahmed Ponugoti, Nikhil Marsland, Daniel |
author_facet | Guerreiro, Fransiska Abdelaziz, Ahmed Ponugoti, Nikhil Marsland, Daniel |
author_sort | Guerreiro, Fransiska |
collection | PubMed |
description | CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc injuries range from sprains to fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints which include injury to the Lisfranc ligament complex. Most require surgical intervention. However, apparently stable injuries can be managed nonoperatively. The aims of the current study were to perform a systematic review of outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registered, a review was performed of the literature (2000 - 2021) reporting Lisfranc injuries considered to be stable and initially managed nonoperatively. Following exclusions, 8 papers were identified; 1 prospective and 7 retrospective studies. A total of 220 patients were studied with a mean age of 39.8 years and mean follow up of 4.3 years. Outcomes included function, displacement, rates of surgery and secondary osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Four papers reported good outcomes, with adjusted functional scores ranging from of 82.6 to 100 (out of 100). However, poor outcomes were frequently reported. One paper reported that late displacement occurred in 54% of patients. Surgical intervention was required in 12.2 to 55.6% of patients. Rates of secondary osteoarthritis were 4.9 to 37.5%. Two papers directly compared operative to non-operative treatment. In an injury matched cohort, superior outcomes were reported in the surgical arm. Numerous limitations were identified, including a lack of consensus on what constitutes a stable injury. Furthermore, wide heterogeneity was identified due to use of different classification systems, PROMS, investigation modalities and treatment protocols. CONCLUSION: Reported outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries vary widely, including high rates of conversion to surgery. There is no agreed definition of what a stable Lisfranc injury is, and no agreed treatment protocol. With the advantage of modern imaging techniques, prospective research is needed to determine which Lisfranc injuries can be safely treated nonoperatively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9660437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96604372022-11-15 Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review Guerreiro, Fransiska Abdelaziz, Ahmed Ponugoti, Nikhil Marsland, Daniel Foot Ankle Orthop Article CATEGORY: Trauma; Midfoot/Forefoot INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Lisfranc injuries range from sprains to fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints which include injury to the Lisfranc ligament complex. Most require surgical intervention. However, apparently stable injuries can be managed nonoperatively. The aims of the current study were to perform a systematic review of outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registered, a review was performed of the literature (2000 - 2021) reporting Lisfranc injuries considered to be stable and initially managed nonoperatively. Following exclusions, 8 papers were identified; 1 prospective and 7 retrospective studies. A total of 220 patients were studied with a mean age of 39.8 years and mean follow up of 4.3 years. Outcomes included function, displacement, rates of surgery and secondary osteoarthritis. RESULTS: Four papers reported good outcomes, with adjusted functional scores ranging from of 82.6 to 100 (out of 100). However, poor outcomes were frequently reported. One paper reported that late displacement occurred in 54% of patients. Surgical intervention was required in 12.2 to 55.6% of patients. Rates of secondary osteoarthritis were 4.9 to 37.5%. Two papers directly compared operative to non-operative treatment. In an injury matched cohort, superior outcomes were reported in the surgical arm. Numerous limitations were identified, including a lack of consensus on what constitutes a stable injury. Furthermore, wide heterogeneity was identified due to use of different classification systems, PROMS, investigation modalities and treatment protocols. CONCLUSION: Reported outcomes following nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries vary widely, including high rates of conversion to surgery. There is no agreed definition of what a stable Lisfranc injury is, and no agreed treatment protocol. With the advantage of modern imaging techniques, prospective research is needed to determine which Lisfranc injuries can be safely treated nonoperatively. SAGE Publications 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9660437/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00680 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Guerreiro, Fransiska Abdelaziz, Ahmed Ponugoti, Nikhil Marsland, Daniel Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic Review |
title | Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic
Review |
title_full | Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic
Review |
title_fullStr | Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic
Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic
Review |
title_short | Conservative Management of Lisfranc Injury: A Systematic
Review |
title_sort | conservative management of lisfranc injury: a systematic
review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660437/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011421S00680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guerreirofransiska conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview AT abdelazizahmed conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview AT ponugotinikhil conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview AT marslanddaniel conservativemanagementoflisfrancinjuryasystematicreview |