Cargando…

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments

INTRODUCTION: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus, is challenging to treat. Efficacy and tolerability of the topical lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) and well-established first-line oral medications (OM) were compared in refractory PDPN p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Überall, Michael, Bösl, Irmgard, Hollanders, Els, Sabatschus, Ingo, Eerdekens, Mariëlle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36368741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003062
_version_ 1784830418176966656
author Überall, Michael
Bösl, Irmgard
Hollanders, Els
Sabatschus, Ingo
Eerdekens, Mariëlle
author_facet Überall, Michael
Bösl, Irmgard
Hollanders, Els
Sabatschus, Ingo
Eerdekens, Mariëlle
author_sort Überall, Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus, is challenging to treat. Efficacy and tolerability of the topical lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) and well-established first-line oral medications (OM) were compared in refractory PDPN patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a subgroup analysis of a non-interventional, retrospective 24-week cohort study using anonymized routine medical care data from the German Pain eRegistry. Propensity score matching provided 732 datasets per treatment group. Primary effectiveness endpoint was the absolute change in average 24-hour Pain Intensity Index (0–100 mm) from baseline after 4, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment and over the entire treatment period. RESULTS: The majority of this multimorbid and polymedicated study population of patients with PDPN had suffered pain for more than a year and presented with a high pain burden despite a median of seven previous analgesic medications. LMP treatment resulted in significant reductions in pain intensity and improvements in daily functioning already after 4 treatment weeks. Effectiveness was maintained over the treatment period even when concomitant analgesics were reduced or discontinued and quality of life improved. Mean change in the primary effectiveness parameter over the 24-week treatment period was −30.2 mm (SE 0.38) and −17.0 mm (SE 0.51) in the LMP and OM groups, respectively. Improvements in all effectiveness parameters were significantly greater under LMP than under OM treatment (p<0.001). Significantly fewer patients under LMP than OM experienced drug-related adverse events (DRAEs; 9.6% vs 61.6%, p<0.001) and discontinued treatment due to DRAEs (4.4% vs 35.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LMP was effective and well tolerated in routine clinical care of patients with PDPN. The more favorable benefit/risk profile and greater reduction in intake of concomitant analgesics compared with OM suggest LMP as a useful treatment option for PDPN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUPAS 32826.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9660555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96605552022-11-15 Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments Überall, Michael Bösl, Irmgard Hollanders, Els Sabatschus, Ingo Eerdekens, Mariëlle BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Pathophysiology/Complications INTRODUCTION: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), a common complication of diabetes mellitus, is challenging to treat. Efficacy and tolerability of the topical lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) and well-established first-line oral medications (OM) were compared in refractory PDPN patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a subgroup analysis of a non-interventional, retrospective 24-week cohort study using anonymized routine medical care data from the German Pain eRegistry. Propensity score matching provided 732 datasets per treatment group. Primary effectiveness endpoint was the absolute change in average 24-hour Pain Intensity Index (0–100 mm) from baseline after 4, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment and over the entire treatment period. RESULTS: The majority of this multimorbid and polymedicated study population of patients with PDPN had suffered pain for more than a year and presented with a high pain burden despite a median of seven previous analgesic medications. LMP treatment resulted in significant reductions in pain intensity and improvements in daily functioning already after 4 treatment weeks. Effectiveness was maintained over the treatment period even when concomitant analgesics were reduced or discontinued and quality of life improved. Mean change in the primary effectiveness parameter over the 24-week treatment period was −30.2 mm (SE 0.38) and −17.0 mm (SE 0.51) in the LMP and OM groups, respectively. Improvements in all effectiveness parameters were significantly greater under LMP than under OM treatment (p<0.001). Significantly fewer patients under LMP than OM experienced drug-related adverse events (DRAEs; 9.6% vs 61.6%, p<0.001) and discontinued treatment due to DRAEs (4.4% vs 35.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LMP was effective and well tolerated in routine clinical care of patients with PDPN. The more favorable benefit/risk profile and greater reduction in intake of concomitant analgesics compared with OM suggest LMP as a useful treatment option for PDPN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUPAS 32826. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9660555/ /pubmed/36368741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003062 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Pathophysiology/Complications
Überall, Michael
Bösl, Irmgard
Hollanders, Els
Sabatschus, Ingo
Eerdekens, Mariëlle
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments
title Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments
title_full Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments
title_fullStr Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments
title_full_unstemmed Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments
title_short Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments
title_sort painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: real-world comparison between topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster and oral treatments
topic Pathophysiology/Complications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36368741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003062
work_keys_str_mv AT uberallmichael painfuldiabeticperipheralneuropathyrealworldcomparisonbetweentopicaltreatmentwithlidocaine700mgmedicatedplasterandoraltreatments
AT boslirmgard painfuldiabeticperipheralneuropathyrealworldcomparisonbetweentopicaltreatmentwithlidocaine700mgmedicatedplasterandoraltreatments
AT hollandersels painfuldiabeticperipheralneuropathyrealworldcomparisonbetweentopicaltreatmentwithlidocaine700mgmedicatedplasterandoraltreatments
AT sabatschusingo painfuldiabeticperipheralneuropathyrealworldcomparisonbetweentopicaltreatmentwithlidocaine700mgmedicatedplasterandoraltreatments
AT eerdekensmarielle painfuldiabeticperipheralneuropathyrealworldcomparisonbetweentopicaltreatmentwithlidocaine700mgmedicatedplasterandoraltreatments