Cargando…

Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Donor-derived modified immune cells (MIC) induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor in preclinical models of transplantation. In a phase I clinical trial (TOL-1 Study), MIC treatment resulted in a cellular phenotype that was directly and indirectly suppr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morath, Christian, Schmitt, Anita, Schmitt, Michael, Wang, Lei, Kleist, Christian, Opelz, Gerhard, Süsal, Caner, Tran, T. Hien, Scherer, Sabine, Schwenger, Vedat, Kemmner, Stephan, Fischereder, Michael, Stangl, Manfred, Hauser, Ingeborg A., Sommerer, Claudia, Nusshag, Christian, Kälble, Florian, Speer, Claudius, Benning, Louise, Bischofs, Christian, Sauer, Sandra, Schubert, Maria-Luisa, Kunz, Alexander, Hückelhoven-Krauss, Angela, Neuber, Brigitte, Mehrabi, Arianeb, Schwab, Constantin, Waldherr, Rüdiger, Sander, Anja, Büsch, Christopher, Czock, David, Böhmig, Georg A, Reiser, Jochen, Roers, Axel, Müller-Tidow, Carsten, Terness, Peter, Zeier, Martin, Daniel, Volker, Schaier, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36368749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066128
_version_ 1784830420347518976
author Morath, Christian
Schmitt, Anita
Schmitt, Michael
Wang, Lei
Kleist, Christian
Opelz, Gerhard
Süsal, Caner
Tran, T. Hien
Scherer, Sabine
Schwenger, Vedat
Kemmner, Stephan
Fischereder, Michael
Stangl, Manfred
Hauser, Ingeborg A.
Sommerer, Claudia
Nusshag, Christian
Kälble, Florian
Speer, Claudius
Benning, Louise
Bischofs, Christian
Sauer, Sandra
Schubert, Maria-Luisa
Kunz, Alexander
Hückelhoven-Krauss, Angela
Neuber, Brigitte
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Schwab, Constantin
Waldherr, Rüdiger
Sander, Anja
Büsch, Christopher
Czock, David
Böhmig, Georg A
Reiser, Jochen
Roers, Axel
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Terness, Peter
Zeier, Martin
Daniel, Volker
Schaier, Matthias
author_facet Morath, Christian
Schmitt, Anita
Schmitt, Michael
Wang, Lei
Kleist, Christian
Opelz, Gerhard
Süsal, Caner
Tran, T. Hien
Scherer, Sabine
Schwenger, Vedat
Kemmner, Stephan
Fischereder, Michael
Stangl, Manfred
Hauser, Ingeborg A.
Sommerer, Claudia
Nusshag, Christian
Kälble, Florian
Speer, Claudius
Benning, Louise
Bischofs, Christian
Sauer, Sandra
Schubert, Maria-Luisa
Kunz, Alexander
Hückelhoven-Krauss, Angela
Neuber, Brigitte
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Schwab, Constantin
Waldherr, Rüdiger
Sander, Anja
Büsch, Christopher
Czock, David
Böhmig, Georg A
Reiser, Jochen
Roers, Axel
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Terness, Peter
Zeier, Martin
Daniel, Volker
Schaier, Matthias
author_sort Morath, Christian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Donor-derived modified immune cells (MIC) induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor in preclinical models of transplantation. In a phase I clinical trial (TOL-1 Study), MIC treatment resulted in a cellular phenotype that was directly and indirectly suppressive to the recipient’s immune system allowing for reduction of conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we describe a protocol for a randomised controlled, multicentre phase-IIb clinical trial of individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor MIC compared with standard-of-care (SoC) in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty-three living donor kidney transplant recipients from six German transplant centres are randomised 2:1 to treatment with MIC (MIC group, N=42) or no treatment with MIC (control arm, N=21). MIC are manufactured from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of MIC treatment together with reduced conventional immunosuppressive therapy in terms of achieving an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared with SoC 12 months after MIC administration. Key secondary endpoints are the number of patient-relevant infections as well as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction or death. Immunosuppressive therapy of MIC-treated patients is reduced during follow-up under an extended immunological monitoring including human leucocyte antigen-antibody testing, and determination of lymphocyte subsets, for example, regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) and antidonor T cell response. A Data Safety Monitoring Board has been established to allow an independent assessment of safety and efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been provided by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (AFmu-580/2021, 17 March 2022) and from the Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany (Vorlage-Nr. 4586/02, 21 March 2022). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients and respective donors prior to enrolment in the study. The results from the TOL-2 Study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals and will be presented at symposia and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05365672.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9660568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96605682022-11-15 Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial Morath, Christian Schmitt, Anita Schmitt, Michael Wang, Lei Kleist, Christian Opelz, Gerhard Süsal, Caner Tran, T. Hien Scherer, Sabine Schwenger, Vedat Kemmner, Stephan Fischereder, Michael Stangl, Manfred Hauser, Ingeborg A. Sommerer, Claudia Nusshag, Christian Kälble, Florian Speer, Claudius Benning, Louise Bischofs, Christian Sauer, Sandra Schubert, Maria-Luisa Kunz, Alexander Hückelhoven-Krauss, Angela Neuber, Brigitte Mehrabi, Arianeb Schwab, Constantin Waldherr, Rüdiger Sander, Anja Büsch, Christopher Czock, David Böhmig, Georg A Reiser, Jochen Roers, Axel Müller-Tidow, Carsten Terness, Peter Zeier, Martin Daniel, Volker Schaier, Matthias BMJ Open Renal Medicine INTRODUCTION: Donor-derived modified immune cells (MIC) induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor in preclinical models of transplantation. In a phase I clinical trial (TOL-1 Study), MIC treatment resulted in a cellular phenotype that was directly and indirectly suppressive to the recipient’s immune system allowing for reduction of conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we describe a protocol for a randomised controlled, multicentre phase-IIb clinical trial of individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor MIC compared with standard-of-care (SoC) in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty-three living donor kidney transplant recipients from six German transplant centres are randomised 2:1 to treatment with MIC (MIC group, N=42) or no treatment with MIC (control arm, N=21). MIC are manufactured from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of MIC treatment together with reduced conventional immunosuppressive therapy in terms of achieving an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared with SoC 12 months after MIC administration. Key secondary endpoints are the number of patient-relevant infections as well as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction or death. Immunosuppressive therapy of MIC-treated patients is reduced during follow-up under an extended immunological monitoring including human leucocyte antigen-antibody testing, and determination of lymphocyte subsets, for example, regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) and antidonor T cell response. A Data Safety Monitoring Board has been established to allow an independent assessment of safety and efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been provided by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (AFmu-580/2021, 17 March 2022) and from the Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany (Vorlage-Nr. 4586/02, 21 March 2022). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients and respective donors prior to enrolment in the study. The results from the TOL-2 Study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals and will be presented at symposia and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05365672. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9660568/ /pubmed/36368749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066128 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Renal Medicine
Morath, Christian
Schmitt, Anita
Schmitt, Michael
Wang, Lei
Kleist, Christian
Opelz, Gerhard
Süsal, Caner
Tran, T. Hien
Scherer, Sabine
Schwenger, Vedat
Kemmner, Stephan
Fischereder, Michael
Stangl, Manfred
Hauser, Ingeborg A.
Sommerer, Claudia
Nusshag, Christian
Kälble, Florian
Speer, Claudius
Benning, Louise
Bischofs, Christian
Sauer, Sandra
Schubert, Maria-Luisa
Kunz, Alexander
Hückelhoven-Krauss, Angela
Neuber, Brigitte
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Schwab, Constantin
Waldherr, Rüdiger
Sander, Anja
Büsch, Christopher
Czock, David
Böhmig, Georg A
Reiser, Jochen
Roers, Axel
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Terness, Peter
Zeier, Martin
Daniel, Volker
Schaier, Matthias
Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial
title Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial
title_full Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial
title_short Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial
title_sort individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (tol-2 study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase ii, randomised controlled trial
topic Renal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36368749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066128
work_keys_str_mv AT morathchristian individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmittanita individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmittmichael individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wanglei individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kleistchristian individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT opelzgerhard individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT susalcaner individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tranthien individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT scherersabine individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schwengervedat individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kemmnerstephan individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fischeredermichael individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stanglmanfred individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hauseringeborga individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sommererclaudia individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nusshagchristian individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kalbleflorian individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT speerclaudius individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT benninglouise individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bischofschristian individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sauersandra individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schubertmarialuisa individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kunzalexander individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT huckelhovenkraussangela individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT neuberbrigitte individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mehrabiarianeb individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schwabconstantin individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waldherrrudiger individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sanderanja individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT buschchristopher individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT czockdavid individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bohmiggeorga individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reiserjochen individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT roersaxel individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mullertidowcarsten individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ternesspeter individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zeiermartin individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT danielvolker individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schaiermatthias individualisedimmunosuppressionwithintravenouslyadministereddonorderivedmodifiedimmunecellscomparedwithstandardofcareinlivingdonorkidneytransplantationtol2studyprotocolforamulticentreopenlabelphaseiirandomisedcontrolledtrial