Cargando…

Assessing proximity effect of high‐acuity pediatric emergency departments on the pediatric readiness scores in neighboring general emergency departments

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine if there is a proximity effect of high‐acuity, pediatric‐capable emergency departments (EDs) on the weighted pediatric readiness score of neighboring general EDs and whether this effect is attributable to specific components of the Natio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brumme, Kristina, Hewes, Hilary A., Richards, Rachel, Gausche‐Hill, Marianne, Remick, Katherine, Donofrio‐Odmann, Joelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12850
Descripción
Sumario:STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine if there is a proximity effect of high‐acuity, pediatric‐capable emergency departments (EDs) on the weighted pediatric readiness score of neighboring general EDs and whether this effect is attributable to specific components of the National Pediatric Readiness Guidelines. METHODS: Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score of EDs based on the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment. High‐acuity, pediatric‐capable EDs were defined as those with a separate pediatric ED and inpatient pediatric services, including the following: pediatric ICU, pediatric ward, and neonatal ICU. Neighboring general EDs are within a 30‐minute drive time of a high‐acuity, pediatric‐capable ED. Analysis was stratified by annual ED pediatric volume: low (<1800), medium (1800–4999), medium‐high (5000–9999), and high (>10,000). We analyzed components of the readiness guidelines, including quality improvement/safety initiatives, pediatric emergency care coordinators, and availability of pediatric‐specific equipment. Groups were compared using chi‐squared or Wilcoxon rank‐sum test with P values <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 4149 surveyed hospitals, 3933 general EDs (not high‐acuity, pediatric‐capable EDs) were identified, of which 1009 were located within a 30‐minute drive to a high‐acuity, pediatric‐capable ED. Neighboring general EDs had a statistically significantly higher median weighted pediatric readiness score across pediatric volumes (weighted pediatric readiness score 76.3 vs 65.3; P < 0.001). Neighboring general EDs were more likely to have a pediatric emergency care coordinator, a notification policy for abnormal pediatric vital signs, and >90% of pediatric‐specific equipment. CONCLUSIONS: We found neighboring general EDs have a higher level of pediatric readiness as measured by the median weighted pediatric readiness score. High‐acuity, pediatric‐capable EDs may influence the pediatric readiness of neighboring general Eds, but further investigation is needed to clarify target areas for outreach by state and national partners to improve overall pediatric readiness.