Cargando…

Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of cognitive and pathological heterogeneity in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Data-driven approaches have demonstrated cognitive heterogeneity in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but few studies have examined this heterogen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Kelsey R., Bangen, Katherine J., Weigand, Alexandra J., Ortiz, Gema, Walker, Kayla S., Salmon, David P., Bondi, Mark W., Edmonds, Emily C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220684
_version_ 1784830451443040256
author Thomas, Kelsey R.
Bangen, Katherine J.
Weigand, Alexandra J.
Ortiz, Gema
Walker, Kayla S.
Salmon, David P.
Bondi, Mark W.
Edmonds, Emily C.
author_facet Thomas, Kelsey R.
Bangen, Katherine J.
Weigand, Alexandra J.
Ortiz, Gema
Walker, Kayla S.
Salmon, David P.
Bondi, Mark W.
Edmonds, Emily C.
author_sort Thomas, Kelsey R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of cognitive and pathological heterogeneity in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Data-driven approaches have demonstrated cognitive heterogeneity in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but few studies have examined this heterogeneity and its association with progression to MCI/dementia in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. OBJECTIVE: We identified cluster-derived subgroups of CU participants based on comprehensive neuropsychological data and compared baseline characteristics and rates of progression to MCI/dementia or a Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) of ≤129 across subgroups. METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on individual baseline neuropsychological test scores from 365 CU participants in the UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center longitudinal cohort. Cox regressions examined the risk of progression to consensus diagnosis of MCI or dementia, or to DRS score ≤129, by cluster group. RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified 5 groups: All-Average (n = 139), Low-Visuospatial (n = 46), Low-Executive (n = 51), Low-Memory/Language (n = 83), and Low-All Domains (n = 46). Subgroups had unique demographic and clinical characteristics. Rates of progression to MCI/dementia or to DRS ≤129 were faster for all subgroups (Low-All Domains progressed the fastest > Low Memory/Language≥Low-Visuospatial and Low-Executive) relative to the All-Average subgroup. CONCLUSION: Faster progression in the Low-Visuospatial, Low-Executive, and Low-Memory/Language groups compared to the All-Average group suggests that there are multiple pathways and/or unique subtle cognitive decline profiles that ultimately lead to a diagnosis of MCI/dementia. Use of comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries that assess several domains may be a key first step toward an individualized approach to early detection and fewer missed opportunities for early intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9661321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96613212022-11-28 Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes Thomas, Kelsey R. Bangen, Katherine J. Weigand, Alexandra J. Ortiz, Gema Walker, Kayla S. Salmon, David P. Bondi, Mark W. Edmonds, Emily C. J Alzheimers Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of cognitive and pathological heterogeneity in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Data-driven approaches have demonstrated cognitive heterogeneity in those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but few studies have examined this heterogeneity and its association with progression to MCI/dementia in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. OBJECTIVE: We identified cluster-derived subgroups of CU participants based on comprehensive neuropsychological data and compared baseline characteristics and rates of progression to MCI/dementia or a Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) of ≤129 across subgroups. METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on individual baseline neuropsychological test scores from 365 CU participants in the UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center longitudinal cohort. Cox regressions examined the risk of progression to consensus diagnosis of MCI or dementia, or to DRS score ≤129, by cluster group. RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified 5 groups: All-Average (n = 139), Low-Visuospatial (n = 46), Low-Executive (n = 51), Low-Memory/Language (n = 83), and Low-All Domains (n = 46). Subgroups had unique demographic and clinical characteristics. Rates of progression to MCI/dementia or to DRS ≤129 were faster for all subgroups (Low-All Domains progressed the fastest > Low Memory/Language≥Low-Visuospatial and Low-Executive) relative to the All-Average subgroup. CONCLUSION: Faster progression in the Low-Visuospatial, Low-Executive, and Low-Memory/Language groups compared to the All-Average group suggests that there are multiple pathways and/or unique subtle cognitive decline profiles that ultimately lead to a diagnosis of MCI/dementia. Use of comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries that assess several domains may be a key first step toward an individualized approach to early detection and fewer missed opportunities for early intervention. IOS Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9661321/ /pubmed/36120785 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220684 Text en © 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thomas, Kelsey R.
Bangen, Katherine J.
Weigand, Alexandra J.
Ortiz, Gema
Walker, Kayla S.
Salmon, David P.
Bondi, Mark W.
Edmonds, Emily C.
Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes
title Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes
title_full Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes
title_fullStr Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes
title_short Cognitive Heterogeneity and Risk of Progression in Data-Driven Subtle Cognitive Decline Phenotypes
title_sort cognitive heterogeneity and risk of progression in data-driven subtle cognitive decline phenotypes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220684
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaskelseyr cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes
AT bangenkatherinej cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes
AT weigandalexandraj cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes
AT ortizgema cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes
AT walkerkaylas cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes
AT salmondavidp cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes
AT bondimarkw cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes
AT edmondsemilyc cognitiveheterogeneityandriskofprogressionindatadrivensubtlecognitivedeclinephenotypes