Cargando…

Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease

BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) training (WMT) is a popular intervention approach against cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, heterogeneity in WM responsiveness suggests that WMT may not be equally efficient for all patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ophey, Anja, Wenzel, Julian, Paul, Riya, Giehl, Kathrin, Rehberg, Sarah, Eggers, Carsten, Reker, Paul, van Eimeren, Thilo, Kalbe, Elke, Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223448
_version_ 1784830454188212224
author Ophey, Anja
Wenzel, Julian
Paul, Riya
Giehl, Kathrin
Rehberg, Sarah
Eggers, Carsten
Reker, Paul
van Eimeren, Thilo
Kalbe, Elke
Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
author_facet Ophey, Anja
Wenzel, Julian
Paul, Riya
Giehl, Kathrin
Rehberg, Sarah
Eggers, Carsten
Reker, Paul
van Eimeren, Thilo
Kalbe, Elke
Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
author_sort Ophey, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) training (WMT) is a popular intervention approach against cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, heterogeneity in WM responsiveness suggests that WMT may not be equally efficient for all patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to evaluate a multivariate model to predict post-intervention verbal WM in patients with PD using a supervised machine learning approach. We test the predictive potential of novel learning parameters derived from the WMT and compare their predictiveness to other more commonly used domains including demographic, clinical, and cognitive data. METHODS: 37 patients with PD (age: 64.09±8.56, 48.6% female, 94.7% Hoehn & Yahr stage 2) participated in a 5-week WMT. Four random forest regression models including 1) cognitive variables only, 2) learning parameters only, 3) both cognitive and learning variables, and 4) the entire set of variables (with additional demographic and clinical data, ‘all’ model), were built to predict immediate and 3-month-follow-up WM. RESULT: The ‘all’ model predicted verbal WM with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the other models, at both immediate (RMSE = 0.184; 95% -CI=[0.184;0.185]) and 3-month follow-up (RMSE = 0.216; 95% -CI=[0.215;0.217]). Cognitive baseline parameters were among the most important predictors in the ‘all’ model. The model combining cognitive and learning parameters significantly outperformed the model solely based on cognitive variables. CONCLUSION: Commonly assessed demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables provide robust prediction of response to WMT. Nonetheless, inclusion of training-inherent learning parameters further boosts precision of prediction models which in turn may augment training benefits following cognitive interventions in patients with PD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9661332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96613322022-11-28 Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease Ophey, Anja Wenzel, Julian Paul, Riya Giehl, Kathrin Rehberg, Sarah Eggers, Carsten Reker, Paul van Eimeren, Thilo Kalbe, Elke Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana J Parkinsons Dis Research Report BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) training (WMT) is a popular intervention approach against cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, heterogeneity in WM responsiveness suggests that WMT may not be equally efficient for all patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to evaluate a multivariate model to predict post-intervention verbal WM in patients with PD using a supervised machine learning approach. We test the predictive potential of novel learning parameters derived from the WMT and compare their predictiveness to other more commonly used domains including demographic, clinical, and cognitive data. METHODS: 37 patients with PD (age: 64.09±8.56, 48.6% female, 94.7% Hoehn & Yahr stage 2) participated in a 5-week WMT. Four random forest regression models including 1) cognitive variables only, 2) learning parameters only, 3) both cognitive and learning variables, and 4) the entire set of variables (with additional demographic and clinical data, ‘all’ model), were built to predict immediate and 3-month-follow-up WM. RESULT: The ‘all’ model predicted verbal WM with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the other models, at both immediate (RMSE = 0.184; 95% -CI=[0.184;0.185]) and 3-month follow-up (RMSE = 0.216; 95% -CI=[0.215;0.217]). Cognitive baseline parameters were among the most important predictors in the ‘all’ model. The model combining cognitive and learning parameters significantly outperformed the model solely based on cognitive variables. CONCLUSION: Commonly assessed demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables provide robust prediction of response to WMT. Nonetheless, inclusion of training-inherent learning parameters further boosts precision of prediction models which in turn may augment training benefits following cognitive interventions in patients with PD. IOS Press 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9661332/ /pubmed/36120792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223448 Text en © 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Report
Ophey, Anja
Wenzel, Julian
Paul, Riya
Giehl, Kathrin
Rehberg, Sarah
Eggers, Carsten
Reker, Paul
van Eimeren, Thilo
Kalbe, Elke
Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease
title Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease
title_full Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease
title_fullStr Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease
title_short Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease
title_sort cognitive performance and learning parameters predict response to working memory training in parkinson’s disease
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223448
work_keys_str_mv AT opheyanja cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT wenzeljulian cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT paulriya cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT giehlkathrin cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT rehbergsarah cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT eggerscarsten cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT rekerpaul cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT vaneimerenthilo cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT kalbeelke cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease
AT kambeitzilankoviclana cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease