Cargando…
Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease
BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) training (WMT) is a popular intervention approach against cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, heterogeneity in WM responsiveness suggests that WMT may not be equally efficient for all patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223448 |
_version_ | 1784830454188212224 |
---|---|
author | Ophey, Anja Wenzel, Julian Paul, Riya Giehl, Kathrin Rehberg, Sarah Eggers, Carsten Reker, Paul van Eimeren, Thilo Kalbe, Elke Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana |
author_facet | Ophey, Anja Wenzel, Julian Paul, Riya Giehl, Kathrin Rehberg, Sarah Eggers, Carsten Reker, Paul van Eimeren, Thilo Kalbe, Elke Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana |
author_sort | Ophey, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) training (WMT) is a popular intervention approach against cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, heterogeneity in WM responsiveness suggests that WMT may not be equally efficient for all patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to evaluate a multivariate model to predict post-intervention verbal WM in patients with PD using a supervised machine learning approach. We test the predictive potential of novel learning parameters derived from the WMT and compare their predictiveness to other more commonly used domains including demographic, clinical, and cognitive data. METHODS: 37 patients with PD (age: 64.09±8.56, 48.6% female, 94.7% Hoehn & Yahr stage 2) participated in a 5-week WMT. Four random forest regression models including 1) cognitive variables only, 2) learning parameters only, 3) both cognitive and learning variables, and 4) the entire set of variables (with additional demographic and clinical data, ‘all’ model), were built to predict immediate and 3-month-follow-up WM. RESULT: The ‘all’ model predicted verbal WM with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the other models, at both immediate (RMSE = 0.184; 95% -CI=[0.184;0.185]) and 3-month follow-up (RMSE = 0.216; 95% -CI=[0.215;0.217]). Cognitive baseline parameters were among the most important predictors in the ‘all’ model. The model combining cognitive and learning parameters significantly outperformed the model solely based on cognitive variables. CONCLUSION: Commonly assessed demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables provide robust prediction of response to WMT. Nonetheless, inclusion of training-inherent learning parameters further boosts precision of prediction models which in turn may augment training benefits following cognitive interventions in patients with PD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9661332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96613322022-11-28 Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease Ophey, Anja Wenzel, Julian Paul, Riya Giehl, Kathrin Rehberg, Sarah Eggers, Carsten Reker, Paul van Eimeren, Thilo Kalbe, Elke Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana J Parkinsons Dis Research Report BACKGROUND: Working memory (WM) training (WMT) is a popular intervention approach against cognitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, heterogeneity in WM responsiveness suggests that WMT may not be equally efficient for all patients. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to evaluate a multivariate model to predict post-intervention verbal WM in patients with PD using a supervised machine learning approach. We test the predictive potential of novel learning parameters derived from the WMT and compare their predictiveness to other more commonly used domains including demographic, clinical, and cognitive data. METHODS: 37 patients with PD (age: 64.09±8.56, 48.6% female, 94.7% Hoehn & Yahr stage 2) participated in a 5-week WMT. Four random forest regression models including 1) cognitive variables only, 2) learning parameters only, 3) both cognitive and learning variables, and 4) the entire set of variables (with additional demographic and clinical data, ‘all’ model), were built to predict immediate and 3-month-follow-up WM. RESULT: The ‘all’ model predicted verbal WM with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) compared to the other models, at both immediate (RMSE = 0.184; 95% -CI=[0.184;0.185]) and 3-month follow-up (RMSE = 0.216; 95% -CI=[0.215;0.217]). Cognitive baseline parameters were among the most important predictors in the ‘all’ model. The model combining cognitive and learning parameters significantly outperformed the model solely based on cognitive variables. CONCLUSION: Commonly assessed demographic, clinical, and cognitive variables provide robust prediction of response to WMT. Nonetheless, inclusion of training-inherent learning parameters further boosts precision of prediction models which in turn may augment training benefits following cognitive interventions in patients with PD. IOS Press 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9661332/ /pubmed/36120792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223448 Text en © 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Report Ophey, Anja Wenzel, Julian Paul, Riya Giehl, Kathrin Rehberg, Sarah Eggers, Carsten Reker, Paul van Eimeren, Thilo Kalbe, Elke Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease |
title | Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_full | Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_short | Cognitive Performance and Learning Parameters Predict Response to Working Memory Training in Parkinson’s Disease |
title_sort | cognitive performance and learning parameters predict response to working memory training in parkinson’s disease |
topic | Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opheyanja cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT wenzeljulian cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT paulriya cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT giehlkathrin cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT rehbergsarah cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT eggerscarsten cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT rekerpaul cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT vaneimerenthilo cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT kalbeelke cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease AT kambeitzilankoviclana cognitiveperformanceandlearningparameterspredictresponsetoworkingmemorytraininginparkinsonsdisease |