Cargando…

Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of routine MRS to assist in the differential diagnosis between post-radiation necrosis and tumor progression. The secondary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of the method. METHOD: An additional sequence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Lucia, Federico, Lefebvre, Yolene, Lemort, Marc P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100449
_version_ 1784830477200261120
author De Lucia, Federico
Lefebvre, Yolene
Lemort, Marc P.
author_facet De Lucia, Federico
Lefebvre, Yolene
Lemort, Marc P.
author_sort De Lucia, Federico
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of routine MRS to assist in the differential diagnosis between post-radiation necrosis and tumor progression. The secondary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of the method. METHOD: An additional sequence of MRS was added to the standard protocol routinely used for patient follow-up. To assess discomfort a control group was formed. The time required to perform MRS and analysis of results, and data about artefacts and technical limitations were collected. MRS results analyzed independently by two neuroradiologists were compared. The diagnostic accuracy of MRS was calculated using a composite reference standard. RESULTS: The experimental group included 38 patients, the control group 41. The discomfort felt during the examination, is not significantly different between the groups. The average quality of SRM is rated as low. The frequency of cerebral radionecrosis is 13 % based on the reference standard used, 54 % and 46 % based on MRS results for the two observers. The additional time is 19,5 min. There is strong inter-observer agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of MRS are respectively for the diagnosis of radionecrosis of 60 % and 45 % (PPV = 16 %NPV = 87 %), for the diagnosis of tumor tissue of 25 % and 94 % (PPV = 80 %NPV = 57%). CONCLUSION: MRS is probably not applicable in routine clinical practice; however, in view of our results and the literature, in selected cases, it could be a support in the diagnosis of radionecrosis or brain tumor progression. Radionecrosis is probably underestimated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9661435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96614352022-11-15 Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions De Lucia, Federico Lefebvre, Yolene Lemort, Marc P. Eur J Radiol Open Original Article OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of routine MRS to assist in the differential diagnosis between post-radiation necrosis and tumor progression. The secondary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of the method. METHOD: An additional sequence of MRS was added to the standard protocol routinely used for patient follow-up. To assess discomfort a control group was formed. The time required to perform MRS and analysis of results, and data about artefacts and technical limitations were collected. MRS results analyzed independently by two neuroradiologists were compared. The diagnostic accuracy of MRS was calculated using a composite reference standard. RESULTS: The experimental group included 38 patients, the control group 41. The discomfort felt during the examination, is not significantly different between the groups. The average quality of SRM is rated as low. The frequency of cerebral radionecrosis is 13 % based on the reference standard used, 54 % and 46 % based on MRS results for the two observers. The additional time is 19,5 min. There is strong inter-observer agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of MRS are respectively for the diagnosis of radionecrosis of 60 % and 45 % (PPV = 16 %NPV = 87 %), for the diagnosis of tumor tissue of 25 % and 94 % (PPV = 80 %NPV = 57%). CONCLUSION: MRS is probably not applicable in routine clinical practice; however, in view of our results and the literature, in selected cases, it could be a support in the diagnosis of radionecrosis or brain tumor progression. Radionecrosis is probably underestimated. Elsevier 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9661435/ /pubmed/36386763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100449 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
De Lucia, Federico
Lefebvre, Yolene
Lemort, Marc P.
Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions
title Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions
title_full Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions
title_fullStr Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions
title_full_unstemmed Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions
title_short Interest of routine MR spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions
title_sort interest of routine mr spectroscopic techniques for differential diagnosis between radionecrosis and progression of brain tumor lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100449
work_keys_str_mv AT deluciafederico interestofroutinemrspectroscopictechniquesfordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenradionecrosisandprogressionofbraintumorlesions
AT lefebvreyolene interestofroutinemrspectroscopictechniquesfordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenradionecrosisandprogressionofbraintumorlesions
AT lemortmarcp interestofroutinemrspectroscopictechniquesfordifferentialdiagnosisbetweenradionecrosisandprogressionofbraintumorlesions