Cargando…
Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning
With the development of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, various calibration transfer algorithms have been proposed, but such algorithms are often based on the same distribution of samples. In machine learning, calibration transfer between types of samples can be achieved using transfer learning an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05563e |
_version_ | 1784830534944292864 |
---|---|
author | Shen, Huanchao Geng, Yingrui Ni, Hongfei Wang, Hui Wu, Jizhong Hao, Xianwei Tie, Jinxin Luo, Yingjie Xu, Tengfei Chen, Yong Liu, Xuesong |
author_facet | Shen, Huanchao Geng, Yingrui Ni, Hongfei Wang, Hui Wu, Jizhong Hao, Xianwei Tie, Jinxin Luo, Yingjie Xu, Tengfei Chen, Yong Liu, Xuesong |
author_sort | Shen, Huanchao |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the development of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, various calibration transfer algorithms have been proposed, but such algorithms are often based on the same distribution of samples. In machine learning, calibration transfer between types of samples can be achieved using transfer learning and does not need many samples. This paper proposed an instance transfer learning algorithm based on boosted weighted extreme learning machine (weighted ELM) to construct NIR quantitative analysis models based on different instruments for tobacco in practical production. The support vector machine (SVM), weighted ELM, and weighted ELM-AdaBoost models were compared after the spectral data were preprocessed by standard normal variate (SNV) and principal component analysis (PCA), and then the weighted ELM-TrAdaBoost model was built using data from the other domain to realize the transfer from different source domains to the target domain. The coefficient of determination of prediction (R(2)) of the weighted ELM-TrAdaBoost model of four target components (nicotine, Cl, K, and total nitrogen) reached 0.9426, 0.8147, 0.7548, and 0.6980. The results demonstrated the superiority of ensemble learning and the source domain samples for model construction, improving the models' generalization ability and prediction performance. This is not a bad approach when modeling with small sample sizes and has the advantage of fast learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9661691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96616912022-11-23 Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning Shen, Huanchao Geng, Yingrui Ni, Hongfei Wang, Hui Wu, Jizhong Hao, Xianwei Tie, Jinxin Luo, Yingjie Xu, Tengfei Chen, Yong Liu, Xuesong RSC Adv Chemistry With the development of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, various calibration transfer algorithms have been proposed, but such algorithms are often based on the same distribution of samples. In machine learning, calibration transfer between types of samples can be achieved using transfer learning and does not need many samples. This paper proposed an instance transfer learning algorithm based on boosted weighted extreme learning machine (weighted ELM) to construct NIR quantitative analysis models based on different instruments for tobacco in practical production. The support vector machine (SVM), weighted ELM, and weighted ELM-AdaBoost models were compared after the spectral data were preprocessed by standard normal variate (SNV) and principal component analysis (PCA), and then the weighted ELM-TrAdaBoost model was built using data from the other domain to realize the transfer from different source domains to the target domain. The coefficient of determination of prediction (R(2)) of the weighted ELM-TrAdaBoost model of four target components (nicotine, Cl, K, and total nitrogen) reached 0.9426, 0.8147, 0.7548, and 0.6980. The results demonstrated the superiority of ensemble learning and the source domain samples for model construction, improving the models' generalization ability and prediction performance. This is not a bad approach when modeling with small sample sizes and has the advantage of fast learning. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9661691/ /pubmed/36425697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05563e Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Shen, Huanchao Geng, Yingrui Ni, Hongfei Wang, Hui Wu, Jizhong Hao, Xianwei Tie, Jinxin Luo, Yingjie Xu, Tengfei Chen, Yong Liu, Xuesong Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning |
title | Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning |
title_full | Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning |
title_fullStr | Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning |
title_short | Across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of NIR spectroscopy based on transfer learning |
title_sort | across different instruments about tobacco quantitative analysis model of nir spectroscopy based on transfer learning |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05563e |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenhuanchao acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT gengyingrui acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT nihongfei acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT wanghui acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT wujizhong acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT haoxianwei acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT tiejinxin acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT luoyingjie acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT xutengfei acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT chenyong acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning AT liuxuesong acrossdifferentinstrumentsabouttobaccoquantitativeanalysismodelofnirspectroscopybasedontransferlearning |