Cargando…

Optimal target of LDL cholesterol level for statin treatment: challenges to monotonic relationship with cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND: Aggressive lipid lowering by high-dose statin treatment has been established for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). Regarding the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, however, the “The lower is the better” concept has been controversial to date. We h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakuma, Masashi, Iimuro, Satoshi, Shinozaki, Tomohiro, Kimura, Takeshi, Nakagawa, Yoshihisa, Ozaki, Yukio, Iwata, Hiroshi, Miyauchi, Katsumi, Daida, Hiroyuki, Suwa, Satoru, Sakuma, Ichiro, Nishihata, Yosuke, Saito, Yasushi, Ogawa, Hisao, Matsuzaki, Masunori, Ohashi, Yasuo, Taguchi, Isao, Toyoda, Shigeru, Inoue, Teruo, Nagai, Ryozo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36372869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02633-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Aggressive lipid lowering by high-dose statin treatment has been established for the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). Regarding the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, however, the “The lower is the better” concept has been controversial to date. We hypothesized that there is an optimal LDL-C level, i.e., a “threshold” value, below which the incidence of cardiovascular events is no longer reduced. We undertook a subanalysis of the REAL-CAD study to explore whether such an optimal target LDL-C level exists by a novel analysis procedure to verify the existence of a monotonic relationship. METHODS: For a total of 11,105 patients with CAD enrolled in the REAL-CAD study, the LDL-C level at 6 months after randomization and 5-year cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. We set the “threshold” value of the LDL-C level under which the hazards were assumed to be constant, by including an artificial covariate max (0, LDL-C − threshold) in the Cox model. The analysis was repeated with different LDL-C thresholds (every 10 mg/dl from 40 to 100 mg/dl) and the model fit was assessed by log-likelihood. RESULTS: For primary outcomes such as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, and unstable angina requiring emergency hospitalization, the model fit assessed by log-likelihood was best when a threshold LDL-C value of 70 mg/dl was assumed. And in the model with a threshold LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl, the hazard ratio was 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.01–1.13) as the LDL-C increased by 10 mg/dl. Therefore, the risk of cardiovascular events decreased monotonically until the LDL-C level was lowered to 70 mg/dl, but when the level was further reduced, the risk was independent of LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis model suggests that a “threshold” value of LDL-C might exist for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in Japanese patients with CAD, and this threshold might be 70 mg/dl for primary composite outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01042730. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-022-02633-5.