_version_ 1784830577100193792
author van der Sande, Masha T.
Powers, Jennifer S.
Kuyper, Thom W.
Norden, Natalia
Salgado-Negret, Beatriz
Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene
Bongers, Frans
Delgado, Diego
Dent, Daisy H.
Derroire, Géraldine
do Espirito Santo, Mario Marcos
Dupuy, Juan Manuel
Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson
Finegan, Bryan
Gavito, Mayra E.
Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis
Jakovac, Catarina C.
Jones, Isabel L.
das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria
Meave, Jorge A.
Mora, Francisco
Muñoz, Rodrigo
Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia
Piotto, Daniel
Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban
Caceres-Siani, Yasmani
Dalban-Pilon, Coralie
Dourdain, Aurélie
Du, Dan V.
García Villalobos, Daniel
Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira
Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo
Poorter, Lourens
author_facet van der Sande, Masha T.
Powers, Jennifer S.
Kuyper, Thom W.
Norden, Natalia
Salgado-Negret, Beatriz
Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene
Bongers, Frans
Delgado, Diego
Dent, Daisy H.
Derroire, Géraldine
do Espirito Santo, Mario Marcos
Dupuy, Juan Manuel
Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson
Finegan, Bryan
Gavito, Mayra E.
Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis
Jakovac, Catarina C.
Jones, Isabel L.
das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria
Meave, Jorge A.
Mora, Francisco
Muñoz, Rodrigo
Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia
Piotto, Daniel
Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban
Caceres-Siani, Yasmani
Dalban-Pilon, Coralie
Dourdain, Aurélie
Du, Dan V.
García Villalobos, Daniel
Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira
Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo
Poorter, Lourens
author_sort van der Sande, Masha T.
collection PubMed
description The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chronosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e. crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1–95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and laboratory analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C : N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9661943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96619432022-11-21 Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession van der Sande, Masha T. Powers, Jennifer S. Kuyper, Thom W. Norden, Natalia Salgado-Negret, Beatriz Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene Bongers, Frans Delgado, Diego Dent, Daisy H. Derroire, Géraldine do Espirito Santo, Mario Marcos Dupuy, Juan Manuel Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson Finegan, Bryan Gavito, Mayra E. Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis Jakovac, Catarina C. Jones, Isabel L. das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria Meave, Jorge A. Mora, Francisco Muñoz, Rodrigo Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia Piotto, Daniel Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban Caceres-Siani, Yasmani Dalban-Pilon, Coralie Dourdain, Aurélie Du, Dan V. García Villalobos, Daniel Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo Poorter, Lourens Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part I: Pathways and Constraints for Forest Restoration The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chronosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e. crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1–95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and laboratory analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C : N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’. The Royal Society 2023-01-02 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9661943/ /pubmed/36373919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0074 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Part I: Pathways and Constraints for Forest Restoration
van der Sande, Masha T.
Powers, Jennifer S.
Kuyper, Thom W.
Norden, Natalia
Salgado-Negret, Beatriz
Silva de Almeida, Jarcilene
Bongers, Frans
Delgado, Diego
Dent, Daisy H.
Derroire, Géraldine
do Espirito Santo, Mario Marcos
Dupuy, Juan Manuel
Fernandes, Geraldo Wilson
Finegan, Bryan
Gavito, Mayra E.
Hernández-Stefanoni, José Luis
Jakovac, Catarina C.
Jones, Isabel L.
das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Maria
Meave, Jorge A.
Mora, Francisco
Muñoz, Rodrigo
Pérez-Cárdenas, Nathalia
Piotto, Daniel
Álvarez-Dávila, Esteban
Caceres-Siani, Yasmani
Dalban-Pilon, Coralie
Dourdain, Aurélie
Du, Dan V.
García Villalobos, Daniel
Nunes, Yule Roberta Ferreira
Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo
Poorter, Lourens
Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession
title Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession
title_full Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession
title_fullStr Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession
title_full_unstemmed Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession
title_short Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession
title_sort soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession
topic Part I: Pathways and Constraints for Forest Restoration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0074
work_keys_str_mv AT vandersandemashat soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT powersjennifers soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT kuyperthomw soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT nordennatalia soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT salgadonegretbeatriz soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT silvadealmeidajarcilene soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT bongersfrans soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT delgadodiego soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT dentdaisyh soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT derroiregeraldine soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT doespiritosantomariomarcos soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT dupuyjuanmanuel soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT fernandesgeraldowilson soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT fineganbryan soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT gavitomayrae soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT hernandezstefanonijoseluis soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT jakovaccatarinac soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT jonesisabell soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT dasdoresmagalhaesvelosomaria soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT meavejorgea soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT morafrancisco soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT munozrodrigo soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT perezcardenasnathalia soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT piottodaniel soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT alvarezdavilaesteban soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT caceressianiyasmani soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT dalbanpiloncoralie soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT dourdainaurelie soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT dudanv soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT garciavillalobosdaniel soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT nunesyulerobertaferreira soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT sanchezazofeifaarturo soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession
AT poorterlourens soilresistanceandrecoveryduringneotropicalforestsuccession