Cargando…

A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes

The science guiding design and evaluation of restoration interventions in tropical landscapes is dominated by ecological processes and outcomes and lacks indicators and methods that integrate human wellbeing into the restoration process. We apply a new systems approach framework for tree restoration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfeifer, Marion, Sallu, Susannah M., Marshall, Andrew R., Rushton, Stephen, Moore, Eleanor, Shirima, Deo D., Smit, Josephine, Kioko, Esther, Barnes, Lauren, Waite, Catherine, Raes, Leander, Braunholtz, Laura, Olivier, Pieter I., Ishengoma, Evodius, Bowers, Sam, Guerreiro-Milheiras, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0111
_version_ 1784830579569590272
author Pfeifer, Marion
Sallu, Susannah M.
Marshall, Andrew R.
Rushton, Stephen
Moore, Eleanor
Shirima, Deo D.
Smit, Josephine
Kioko, Esther
Barnes, Lauren
Waite, Catherine
Raes, Leander
Braunholtz, Laura
Olivier, Pieter I.
Ishengoma, Evodius
Bowers, Sam
Guerreiro-Milheiras, Sergio
author_facet Pfeifer, Marion
Sallu, Susannah M.
Marshall, Andrew R.
Rushton, Stephen
Moore, Eleanor
Shirima, Deo D.
Smit, Josephine
Kioko, Esther
Barnes, Lauren
Waite, Catherine
Raes, Leander
Braunholtz, Laura
Olivier, Pieter I.
Ishengoma, Evodius
Bowers, Sam
Guerreiro-Milheiras, Sergio
author_sort Pfeifer, Marion
collection PubMed
description The science guiding design and evaluation of restoration interventions in tropical landscapes is dominated by ecological processes and outcomes and lacks indicators and methods that integrate human wellbeing into the restoration process. We apply a new systems approach framework for tree restoration in forest-agricultural landscapes to show how this shortcoming can be addressed. Demonstrating ‘proof of concept’, we tested statistical models underlying the framework pathways with data collected from a case study in Tanzania. Local community perceptions of nature's values were not affected by levels of self-reported wildlife-induced crop damage. But mapped predictions from the systems approach under a tree restoration scenario suggested differential outcomes for biodiversity indicators and altered spatial patterns of crop damage risk, expected to jeopardize human wellbeing. The predictions map anticipated trade-offs in costs and benefits of restoration scenarios, which we have started to explore with stakeholders to identify restoration opportunities that consider local knowledge, value systems and human wellbeing. We suggest that the framework be applied to other landscapes to identify commonalities and differences in forest landscape restoration outcomes under varying governance and land use systems. This should form a foundation for evidence-based implementation of the global drive for forest landscape restoration, at local scales. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9661959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96619592022-11-21 A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes Pfeifer, Marion Sallu, Susannah M. Marshall, Andrew R. Rushton, Stephen Moore, Eleanor Shirima, Deo D. Smit, Josephine Kioko, Esther Barnes, Lauren Waite, Catherine Raes, Leander Braunholtz, Laura Olivier, Pieter I. Ishengoma, Evodius Bowers, Sam Guerreiro-Milheiras, Sergio Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Part II: Restoration Planning and Evaluation The science guiding design and evaluation of restoration interventions in tropical landscapes is dominated by ecological processes and outcomes and lacks indicators and methods that integrate human wellbeing into the restoration process. We apply a new systems approach framework for tree restoration in forest-agricultural landscapes to show how this shortcoming can be addressed. Demonstrating ‘proof of concept’, we tested statistical models underlying the framework pathways with data collected from a case study in Tanzania. Local community perceptions of nature's values were not affected by levels of self-reported wildlife-induced crop damage. But mapped predictions from the systems approach under a tree restoration scenario suggested differential outcomes for biodiversity indicators and altered spatial patterns of crop damage risk, expected to jeopardize human wellbeing. The predictions map anticipated trade-offs in costs and benefits of restoration scenarios, which we have started to explore with stakeholders to identify restoration opportunities that consider local knowledge, value systems and human wellbeing. We suggest that the framework be applied to other landscapes to identify commonalities and differences in forest landscape restoration outcomes under varying governance and land use systems. This should form a foundation for evidence-based implementation of the global drive for forest landscape restoration, at local scales. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’. The Royal Society 2023-01-02 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9661959/ /pubmed/36373913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0111 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Part II: Restoration Planning and Evaluation
Pfeifer, Marion
Sallu, Susannah M.
Marshall, Andrew R.
Rushton, Stephen
Moore, Eleanor
Shirima, Deo D.
Smit, Josephine
Kioko, Esther
Barnes, Lauren
Waite, Catherine
Raes, Leander
Braunholtz, Laura
Olivier, Pieter I.
Ishengoma, Evodius
Bowers, Sam
Guerreiro-Milheiras, Sergio
A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes
title A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes
title_full A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes
title_fullStr A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes
title_full_unstemmed A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes
title_short A systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes
title_sort systems approach framework for evaluating tree restoration interventions for social and ecological outcomes in rural tropical landscapes
topic Part II: Restoration Planning and Evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9661959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0111
work_keys_str_mv AT pfeifermarion asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT sallususannahm asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT marshallandrewr asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT rushtonstephen asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT mooreeleanor asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT shirimadeod asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT smitjosephine asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT kiokoesther asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT barneslauren asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT waitecatherine asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT raesleander asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT braunholtzlaura asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT olivierpieteri asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT ishengomaevodius asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT bowerssam asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT guerreiromilheirassergio asystemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT pfeifermarion systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT sallususannahm systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT marshallandrewr systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT rushtonstephen systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT mooreeleanor systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT shirimadeod systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT smitjosephine systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT kiokoesther systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT barneslauren systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT waitecatherine systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT raesleander systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT braunholtzlaura systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT olivierpieteri systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT ishengomaevodius systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT bowerssam systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes
AT guerreiromilheirassergio systemsapproachframeworkforevaluatingtreerestorationinterventionsforsocialandecologicaloutcomesinruraltropicallandscapes