Cargando…
Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages
Information and communication technology (ICT) has made higher education available to many students in a new way. The role of online learning in higher education institutions (HEIs) has grown to an unprecedented scale due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The diversity of higher education students has incre...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9662130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00931-6 |
_version_ | 1784830626651701248 |
---|---|
author | Laamanen, Merja Ladonlahti, Tarja Puupponen, Hannu Kärkkäinen, Tommi |
author_facet | Laamanen, Merja Ladonlahti, Tarja Puupponen, Hannu Kärkkäinen, Tommi |
author_sort | Laamanen, Merja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Information and communication technology (ICT) has made higher education available to many students in a new way. The role of online learning in higher education institutions (HEIs) has grown to an unprecedented scale due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The diversity of higher education students has increased, and accessible solutions are needed. New European and national regulations support these trends. The research reported in this paper was conducted in Finland, which is one of the leading European countries in terms of high technology and digitalisation. The aim of this research is to explore the accessibility of all Finnish HEIs’ (N = 38) landing pages based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1). The situations before and after recent legislation are compared. Previous studies have shown that HEIs’ landing pages typically have many accessibility errors. Unlike previous studies, this study considered the types of accessibility errors at a detailed level to support HEIs’ development and implementation of accessibility standards. A combination of two automated accessibility testing tools was used, and the performance of individual tools was analysed. The results show that HEIs’ landing pages are not accessible and there are enormous differences between institutions. Two clusters of HEIs were found: one with good accessibility in terms of WCAG 2.1’s four principles (perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust), and one with poor accessibility. On half of the HEIs’ landing pages with poor accessibility, the number of errors increased even given the binding nature of the law. Obviously, there is still work to be done. Implications for practice are also discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9662130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96621302022-11-14 Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages Laamanen, Merja Ladonlahti, Tarja Puupponen, Hannu Kärkkäinen, Tommi Univers Access Inf Soc Short Paper Information and communication technology (ICT) has made higher education available to many students in a new way. The role of online learning in higher education institutions (HEIs) has grown to an unprecedented scale due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The diversity of higher education students has increased, and accessible solutions are needed. New European and national regulations support these trends. The research reported in this paper was conducted in Finland, which is one of the leading European countries in terms of high technology and digitalisation. The aim of this research is to explore the accessibility of all Finnish HEIs’ (N = 38) landing pages based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1). The situations before and after recent legislation are compared. Previous studies have shown that HEIs’ landing pages typically have many accessibility errors. Unlike previous studies, this study considered the types of accessibility errors at a detailed level to support HEIs’ development and implementation of accessibility standards. A combination of two automated accessibility testing tools was used, and the performance of individual tools was analysed. The results show that HEIs’ landing pages are not accessible and there are enormous differences between institutions. Two clusters of HEIs were found: one with good accessibility in terms of WCAG 2.1’s four principles (perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust), and one with poor accessibility. On half of the HEIs’ landing pages with poor accessibility, the number of errors increased even given the binding nature of the law. Obviously, there is still work to be done. Implications for practice are also discussed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9662130/ /pubmed/36407565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00931-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Paper Laamanen, Merja Ladonlahti, Tarja Puupponen, Hannu Kärkkäinen, Tommi Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages |
title | Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages |
title_full | Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages |
title_fullStr | Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages |
title_short | Does the law matter? An empirical study on the accessibility of Finnish higher education institutions’ web pages |
title_sort | does the law matter? an empirical study on the accessibility of finnish higher education institutions’ web pages |
topic | Short Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9662130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00931-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laamanenmerja doesthelawmatteranempiricalstudyontheaccessibilityoffinnishhighereducationinstitutionswebpages AT ladonlahtitarja doesthelawmatteranempiricalstudyontheaccessibilityoffinnishhighereducationinstitutionswebpages AT puupponenhannu doesthelawmatteranempiricalstudyontheaccessibilityoffinnishhighereducationinstitutionswebpages AT karkkainentommi doesthelawmatteranempiricalstudyontheaccessibilityoffinnishhighereducationinstitutionswebpages |