Cargando…

Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons

BACKGROUND: The number of complications after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is high and survival rates are low compared to hip and knee arthroplasties. The most common reason for revision is aseptic loosening, which might be caused by overloading of the elbow. In an attempt to lower failure rates,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dam, Willemijn, Meijering, Danielle, Stevens, Martin, Boerboom, Alexander L., Eygendaal, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9662720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277662
_version_ 1784830727861305344
author van Dam, Willemijn
Meijering, Danielle
Stevens, Martin
Boerboom, Alexander L.
Eygendaal, Denise
author_facet van Dam, Willemijn
Meijering, Danielle
Stevens, Martin
Boerboom, Alexander L.
Eygendaal, Denise
author_sort van Dam, Willemijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of complications after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is high and survival rates are low compared to hip and knee arthroplasties. The most common reason for revision is aseptic loosening, which might be caused by overloading of the elbow. In an attempt to lower failure rates, current clinical practice is to restrict activities for patients with a TEA. However, postoperative management of TEA is a poorly investigated topic, as no evidence-based clinical guidelines exist and the aftercare is often surgeon-based. In this study we evaluated the current postoperative management of TEA among orthopedic surgeons. METHODS: An online survey of 30 questions was sent to 635 members of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow (SECEC/ESSSE), about 10% (n = ± 64) of whom are considered dedicated elbow specialists. The questions were on characteristics of the surgeon and on the surgeon’s preferred postoperative management, including items to be assessed on length of immobilization, amount of weight bearing and axial loading, instructions on lifelong activities, physiotherapy, and postoperative evaluation of the elbow. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 54 dedicated elbow specialists from 17 different countries. Postoperative immobilization of the elbow was advised by half of respondents when using the triceps-sparing approach (52%), and even more with the triceps-detaching approach (65%). Postoperative passive movement of the elbow was allowed in the triceps-sparing approach (91%) and in the triceps-detaching approach (87%). Most respondents gave recommendations on weight bearing (91%) or axial loading (76%) by the affected elbow, but the specification shows significant variation. CONCLUSION: The results from this survey demonstrate a wide variation in postoperative care of TEA. The lack of consensus in combination with low survival rates stresses the need for clinical guidelines. Further research should focus on creating these guidelines to improve follow-up care for TEA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9662720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96627202022-11-15 Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons van Dam, Willemijn Meijering, Danielle Stevens, Martin Boerboom, Alexander L. Eygendaal, Denise PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of complications after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is high and survival rates are low compared to hip and knee arthroplasties. The most common reason for revision is aseptic loosening, which might be caused by overloading of the elbow. In an attempt to lower failure rates, current clinical practice is to restrict activities for patients with a TEA. However, postoperative management of TEA is a poorly investigated topic, as no evidence-based clinical guidelines exist and the aftercare is often surgeon-based. In this study we evaluated the current postoperative management of TEA among orthopedic surgeons. METHODS: An online survey of 30 questions was sent to 635 members of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow (SECEC/ESSSE), about 10% (n = ± 64) of whom are considered dedicated elbow specialists. The questions were on characteristics of the surgeon and on the surgeon’s preferred postoperative management, including items to be assessed on length of immobilization, amount of weight bearing and axial loading, instructions on lifelong activities, physiotherapy, and postoperative evaluation of the elbow. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 54 dedicated elbow specialists from 17 different countries. Postoperative immobilization of the elbow was advised by half of respondents when using the triceps-sparing approach (52%), and even more with the triceps-detaching approach (65%). Postoperative passive movement of the elbow was allowed in the triceps-sparing approach (91%) and in the triceps-detaching approach (87%). Most respondents gave recommendations on weight bearing (91%) or axial loading (76%) by the affected elbow, but the specification shows significant variation. CONCLUSION: The results from this survey demonstrate a wide variation in postoperative care of TEA. The lack of consensus in combination with low survival rates stresses the need for clinical guidelines. Further research should focus on creating these guidelines to improve follow-up care for TEA. Public Library of Science 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9662720/ /pubmed/36374842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277662 Text en © 2022 Dam et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Dam, Willemijn
Meijering, Danielle
Stevens, Martin
Boerboom, Alexander L.
Eygendaal, Denise
Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons
title Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons
title_full Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons
title_fullStr Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons
title_short Postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: Results of a European survey among orthopedic surgeons
title_sort postoperative management of total elbow arthroplasty: results of a european survey among orthopedic surgeons
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9662720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36374842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277662
work_keys_str_mv AT vandamwillemijn postoperativemanagementoftotalelbowarthroplastyresultsofaeuropeansurveyamongorthopedicsurgeons
AT meijeringdanielle postoperativemanagementoftotalelbowarthroplastyresultsofaeuropeansurveyamongorthopedicsurgeons
AT stevensmartin postoperativemanagementoftotalelbowarthroplastyresultsofaeuropeansurveyamongorthopedicsurgeons
AT boerboomalexanderl postoperativemanagementoftotalelbowarthroplastyresultsofaeuropeansurveyamongorthopedicsurgeons
AT eygendaaldenise postoperativemanagementoftotalelbowarthroplastyresultsofaeuropeansurveyamongorthopedicsurgeons