Cargando…

Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome

Background: Fluid regimens in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are conflicting. The amount of fluid and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level may interact leading to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). We therefore evaluated restrictive and liberal fluid strategies associated wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Felix, Nathane S., Maia, Ligia A., Rocha, Nazareth N., Rodrigues, Gisele C., Medeiros, Mayck, da Silva, Leticia A., Baldavira, Camila M., Fernezlian, Sandra de M., Eher, Esmeralda M., Capelozzi, Vera L., Malbrain, Manu L. N. G., Pelosi, Paolo, Rocco, Patricia R. M., Silva, Pedro L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.992401
_version_ 1784830886663946240
author Felix, Nathane S.
Maia, Ligia A.
Rocha, Nazareth N.
Rodrigues, Gisele C.
Medeiros, Mayck
da Silva, Leticia A.
Baldavira, Camila M.
Fernezlian, Sandra de M.
Eher, Esmeralda M.
Capelozzi, Vera L.
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
Pelosi, Paolo
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Silva, Pedro L.
author_facet Felix, Nathane S.
Maia, Ligia A.
Rocha, Nazareth N.
Rodrigues, Gisele C.
Medeiros, Mayck
da Silva, Leticia A.
Baldavira, Camila M.
Fernezlian, Sandra de M.
Eher, Esmeralda M.
Capelozzi, Vera L.
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
Pelosi, Paolo
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Silva, Pedro L.
author_sort Felix, Nathane S.
collection PubMed
description Background: Fluid regimens in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are conflicting. The amount of fluid and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level may interact leading to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). We therefore evaluated restrictive and liberal fluid strategies associated with low and high PEEP levels with regard to lung and kidney damage, as well as cardiorespiratory function in endotoxin-induced ARDS. Methods: Thirty male Wistar rats received an intratracheal instillation of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. After 24 h, the animals were anesthetized, protectively ventilated (V(T) = 6 ml/kg), and randomized to restrictive (5 ml/kg/h) or liberal (40 ml/kg/h) fluid strategies (Ringer lactate). Both groups were then ventilated with PEEP = 3 cmH(2)O (PEEP3) and PEEP = 9 cmH(2)O (PEEP9) for 1 h (n = 6/group). Echocardiography, arterial blood gases, and lung mechanics were evaluated throughout the experiments. Histologic analyses were done on the lungs, and molecular biology was assessed in lungs and kidneys using six non-ventilated animals with no fluid therapy. Results: In lungs, the liberal group showed increased transpulmonary plateau pressure compared with the restrictive group (liberal, 23.5 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O; restrictive, 18.8 ± 2.3 cmH(2)O, p = 0.046) under PEEP = 9 cmH(2)O. Gene expression associated with inflammation (interleukin [IL]-6) was higher in the liberal-PEEP9 group than the liberal-PEEP3 group (p = 0.006) and restrictive-PEEP9 (p = 0.012), Regardless of the fluid strategy, lung mechanical power and the heterogeneity index were higher, whereas birefringence for claudin-4 and zonula-ocludens-1 gene expression were lower in the PEEP9 groups. Perivascular edema was higher in liberal groups, regardless of PEEP levels. Markers related to damage to epithelial cells [club cell secreted protein (CC16)] and the extracellular matrix (syndecan) were higher in the liberal-PEEP9 group than the liberal-PEEP3 group (p = 0.010 and p = 0.024, respectively). In kidneys, the expression of IL-6 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin was higher in PEEP9 groups, regardless of the fluid strategy. For the liberal strategy, PEEP = 9 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 3 cmH(2)O reduced the right ventricle systolic volume (37%) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (45%). Conclusion: The combination of a liberal fluid strategy and high PEEP led to more lung damage. The application of high PEEP, regardless of the fluid strategy, may also be deleterious to kidneys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9663484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96634842022-11-15 Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome Felix, Nathane S. Maia, Ligia A. Rocha, Nazareth N. Rodrigues, Gisele C. Medeiros, Mayck da Silva, Leticia A. Baldavira, Camila M. Fernezlian, Sandra de M. Eher, Esmeralda M. Capelozzi, Vera L. Malbrain, Manu L. N. G. Pelosi, Paolo Rocco, Patricia R. M. Silva, Pedro L. Front Physiol Physiology Background: Fluid regimens in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are conflicting. The amount of fluid and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level may interact leading to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). We therefore evaluated restrictive and liberal fluid strategies associated with low and high PEEP levels with regard to lung and kidney damage, as well as cardiorespiratory function in endotoxin-induced ARDS. Methods: Thirty male Wistar rats received an intratracheal instillation of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. After 24 h, the animals were anesthetized, protectively ventilated (V(T) = 6 ml/kg), and randomized to restrictive (5 ml/kg/h) or liberal (40 ml/kg/h) fluid strategies (Ringer lactate). Both groups were then ventilated with PEEP = 3 cmH(2)O (PEEP3) and PEEP = 9 cmH(2)O (PEEP9) for 1 h (n = 6/group). Echocardiography, arterial blood gases, and lung mechanics were evaluated throughout the experiments. Histologic analyses were done on the lungs, and molecular biology was assessed in lungs and kidneys using six non-ventilated animals with no fluid therapy. Results: In lungs, the liberal group showed increased transpulmonary plateau pressure compared with the restrictive group (liberal, 23.5 ± 2.9 cmH(2)O; restrictive, 18.8 ± 2.3 cmH(2)O, p = 0.046) under PEEP = 9 cmH(2)O. Gene expression associated with inflammation (interleukin [IL]-6) was higher in the liberal-PEEP9 group than the liberal-PEEP3 group (p = 0.006) and restrictive-PEEP9 (p = 0.012), Regardless of the fluid strategy, lung mechanical power and the heterogeneity index were higher, whereas birefringence for claudin-4 and zonula-ocludens-1 gene expression were lower in the PEEP9 groups. Perivascular edema was higher in liberal groups, regardless of PEEP levels. Markers related to damage to epithelial cells [club cell secreted protein (CC16)] and the extracellular matrix (syndecan) were higher in the liberal-PEEP9 group than the liberal-PEEP3 group (p = 0.010 and p = 0.024, respectively). In kidneys, the expression of IL-6 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin was higher in PEEP9 groups, regardless of the fluid strategy. For the liberal strategy, PEEP = 9 cmH(2)O compared with PEEP = 3 cmH(2)O reduced the right ventricle systolic volume (37%) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (45%). Conclusion: The combination of a liberal fluid strategy and high PEEP led to more lung damage. The application of high PEEP, regardless of the fluid strategy, may also be deleterious to kidneys. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9663484/ /pubmed/36388107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.992401 Text en Copyright © 2022 Felix, Maia, Rocha, Rodrigues, Medeiros, da Silva, Baldavira, Fernezlian, Eher, Capelozzi, Malbrain, Pelosi, Rocco and Silva. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Felix, Nathane S.
Maia, Ligia A.
Rocha, Nazareth N.
Rodrigues, Gisele C.
Medeiros, Mayck
da Silva, Leticia A.
Baldavira, Camila M.
Fernezlian, Sandra de M.
Eher, Esmeralda M.
Capelozzi, Vera L.
Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
Pelosi, Paolo
Rocco, Patricia R. M.
Silva, Pedro L.
Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome
title Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_fullStr Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_short Biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high PEEP levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_sort biological impact of restrictive and liberal fluid strategies at low and high peep levels on lung and distal organs in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.992401
work_keys_str_mv AT felixnathanes biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT maialigiaa biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT rochanazarethn biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT rodriguesgiselec biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT medeirosmayck biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT dasilvaleticiaa biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT baldaviracamilam biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT fernezliansandradem biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT eheresmeraldam biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT capelozziveral biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT malbrainmanulng biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT pelosipaolo biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT roccopatriciarm biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT silvapedrol biologicalimpactofrestrictiveandliberalfluidstrategiesatlowandhighpeeplevelsonlunganddistalorgansinexperimentalacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome