Cargando…

Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND: As the number of genetic mutations that must be tested increases, the Oncomine Dx Target test (ODxTT), which can simultaneously detect multiple cancer‐related genes is becoming the main test used in preference to single‐molecule testing. In this study, we evaluated the performance of ODx...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murakami, Shuji, Yokose, Tomoyuki, Shinada, Kanako, Isaka, Testuya, Katakura, Kengo, Ushio, Ryouta, Kondo, Tetsuro, Kato, Terufumi, Ito, Hiroyuki, Saito, Haruhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14685
_version_ 1784830932464697344
author Murakami, Shuji
Yokose, Tomoyuki
Shinada, Kanako
Isaka, Testuya
Katakura, Kengo
Ushio, Ryouta
Kondo, Tetsuro
Kato, Terufumi
Ito, Hiroyuki
Saito, Haruhiro
author_facet Murakami, Shuji
Yokose, Tomoyuki
Shinada, Kanako
Isaka, Testuya
Katakura, Kengo
Ushio, Ryouta
Kondo, Tetsuro
Kato, Terufumi
Ito, Hiroyuki
Saito, Haruhiro
author_sort Murakami, Shuji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As the number of genetic mutations that must be tested increases, the Oncomine Dx Target test (ODxTT), which can simultaneously detect multiple cancer‐related genes is becoming the main test used in preference to single‐molecule testing. In this study, we evaluated the performance of ODxTT and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 (cobas EGFR), one of the single‐molecule tests, in detecting EGFR mutations. METHODS: Samples from 211 patients diagnosed with NS‐NSCLC were tested simultaneously or sequentially with the cobas EGFR mutation test and ODxTT. We compared the success and detection rates of both tests and evaluated their equivalence by determining the concordance rate and k‐coefficient of both tests. RESULTS: The success rate in detecting EGFR mutations was 95.7% for ODxTT and 100% for cobas EGFR. EGFR mutations were detected in 26.5% of samples with ODxTT and in 28.0% with cobas EGFR. For the 200 samples successfully analyzed with both tests, the concordance rate and k‐coefficient were 97.5% and 0.938, respectively. ODxTT failed to detect two exon 19 deletion mutations (p.E746_P753delinsVS and p.E746_P753delinsLS), and cobas EGFR failed to detect three instances of an exon 19 deletion (p.L747_P753delinsS), L861R, and an exon 20 insertion. DISCUSSION: The success rate of ODxTT is slightly inferior to that of cobas EGFR. ODxTT shared a high concordance rate and k‐coefficient with cobas EGFR in detecting EGFR mutations, but discordant results between the two tests were observed in a few cases, mainly due to the difference of detectable EGFR variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9663664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96636642022-11-16 Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations Murakami, Shuji Yokose, Tomoyuki Shinada, Kanako Isaka, Testuya Katakura, Kengo Ushio, Ryouta Kondo, Tetsuro Kato, Terufumi Ito, Hiroyuki Saito, Haruhiro Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: As the number of genetic mutations that must be tested increases, the Oncomine Dx Target test (ODxTT), which can simultaneously detect multiple cancer‐related genes is becoming the main test used in preference to single‐molecule testing. In this study, we evaluated the performance of ODxTT and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 (cobas EGFR), one of the single‐molecule tests, in detecting EGFR mutations. METHODS: Samples from 211 patients diagnosed with NS‐NSCLC were tested simultaneously or sequentially with the cobas EGFR mutation test and ODxTT. We compared the success and detection rates of both tests and evaluated their equivalence by determining the concordance rate and k‐coefficient of both tests. RESULTS: The success rate in detecting EGFR mutations was 95.7% for ODxTT and 100% for cobas EGFR. EGFR mutations were detected in 26.5% of samples with ODxTT and in 28.0% with cobas EGFR. For the 200 samples successfully analyzed with both tests, the concordance rate and k‐coefficient were 97.5% and 0.938, respectively. ODxTT failed to detect two exon 19 deletion mutations (p.E746_P753delinsVS and p.E746_P753delinsLS), and cobas EGFR failed to detect three instances of an exon 19 deletion (p.L747_P753delinsS), L861R, and an exon 20 insertion. DISCUSSION: The success rate of ODxTT is slightly inferior to that of cobas EGFR. ODxTT shared a high concordance rate and k‐coefficient with cobas EGFR in detecting EGFR mutations, but discordant results between the two tests were observed in a few cases, mainly due to the difference of detectable EGFR variants. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-10-06 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9663664/ /pubmed/36203199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14685 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Murakami, Shuji
Yokose, Tomoyuki
Shinada, Kanako
Isaka, Testuya
Katakura, Kengo
Ushio, Ryouta
Kondo, Tetsuro
Kato, Terufumi
Ito, Hiroyuki
Saito, Haruhiro
Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations
title Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations
title_full Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations
title_fullStr Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations
title_short Comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas EGFR mutation test v2 in detecting EGFR mutations
title_sort comparison of next‐generation sequencing and cobas egfr mutation test v2 in detecting egfr mutations
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36203199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14685
work_keys_str_mv AT murakamishuji comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT yokosetomoyuki comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT shinadakanako comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT isakatestuya comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT katakurakengo comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT ushioryouta comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT kondotetsuro comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT katoterufumi comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT itohiroyuki comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations
AT saitoharuhiro comparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandcobasegfrmutationtestv2indetectingegfrmutations