Cargando…
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)-based glycemic parameters between women with normoglycemia and early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) identified on the basis of mild fasting plasma glucose elevation (FPG, 5.1–5....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w |
_version_ | 1784830957215285248 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Yashdeep Singh, Charandeep Goyal, Alpesh Kalaivani, Mani Bharti, Juhi Singhal, Seema Kachhawa, Garima Kulshrestha, Vidushi Kumari, Rajesh Mahey, Reeta Sharma, Jai B. Malhotra, Neena Bhatla, Neerja Khadgawat, Rajesh Tandon, Nikhil |
author_facet | Gupta, Yashdeep Singh, Charandeep Goyal, Alpesh Kalaivani, Mani Bharti, Juhi Singhal, Seema Kachhawa, Garima Kulshrestha, Vidushi Kumari, Rajesh Mahey, Reeta Sharma, Jai B. Malhotra, Neena Bhatla, Neerja Khadgawat, Rajesh Tandon, Nikhil |
author_sort | Gupta, Yashdeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)-based glycemic parameters between women with normoglycemia and early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) identified on the basis of mild fasting plasma glucose elevation (FPG, 5.1–5.5 mmol/L) and/or post-load plasma glucose elevation (PLG, 1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included women with singleton pregnancy (8(+0) to 19(+6) weeks of gestation) and normoglycemia or GDM per World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 criteria. We evaluated the glycemic parameters of clinical interest using blinded CGMS evaluation and reported them per standard methodology proposed by Hernandez et al. RESULTS: A total of 87 women (GDM, n = 38) were enrolled at 28.6 ± 4.5 years. Among women with GDM, 10 (26.3%) had isolated mild FPG elevation (5.1–5.5 mmol/L), 10 (26.3%) had isolated PLG elevation (1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L), and 7 (18.4%) had a combination of both. The remaining 11 (28.9%) had elevated FPG (≥ 5.6 mmol/L) with or without PLG elevation. Thus, when an isolated FPG cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L is used to diagnose GDM, 27 (71.0%) women would be perceived as normoglycemic. Such women had significantly higher CGMS parameters of clinical interest, such as 24-h mean glucose, fasting glucose, 1-h and 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), 1-h PPG excursion, and peak PPG. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated FPG threshold, especially the higher cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, can potentially miss a large proportion of women (nearly three-fourths) diagnosed with GDM per WHO 2013 criteria. Eventually, such women fare significantly differently from normoglycemic women in various CGMS parameters of clinical interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9663780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96637802022-11-15 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study Gupta, Yashdeep Singh, Charandeep Goyal, Alpesh Kalaivani, Mani Bharti, Juhi Singhal, Seema Kachhawa, Garima Kulshrestha, Vidushi Kumari, Rajesh Mahey, Reeta Sharma, Jai B. Malhotra, Neena Bhatla, Neerja Khadgawat, Rajesh Tandon, Nikhil Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)-based glycemic parameters between women with normoglycemia and early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) identified on the basis of mild fasting plasma glucose elevation (FPG, 5.1–5.5 mmol/L) and/or post-load plasma glucose elevation (PLG, 1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included women with singleton pregnancy (8(+0) to 19(+6) weeks of gestation) and normoglycemia or GDM per World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 criteria. We evaluated the glycemic parameters of clinical interest using blinded CGMS evaluation and reported them per standard methodology proposed by Hernandez et al. RESULTS: A total of 87 women (GDM, n = 38) were enrolled at 28.6 ± 4.5 years. Among women with GDM, 10 (26.3%) had isolated mild FPG elevation (5.1–5.5 mmol/L), 10 (26.3%) had isolated PLG elevation (1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L), and 7 (18.4%) had a combination of both. The remaining 11 (28.9%) had elevated FPG (≥ 5.6 mmol/L) with or without PLG elevation. Thus, when an isolated FPG cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L is used to diagnose GDM, 27 (71.0%) women would be perceived as normoglycemic. Such women had significantly higher CGMS parameters of clinical interest, such as 24-h mean glucose, fasting glucose, 1-h and 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), 1-h PPG excursion, and peak PPG. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated FPG threshold, especially the higher cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, can potentially miss a large proportion of women (nearly three-fourths) diagnosed with GDM per WHO 2013 criteria. Eventually, such women fare significantly differently from normoglycemic women in various CGMS parameters of clinical interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w. Springer Healthcare 2022-09-14 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9663780/ /pubmed/36103111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gupta, Yashdeep Singh, Charandeep Goyal, Alpesh Kalaivani, Mani Bharti, Juhi Singhal, Seema Kachhawa, Garima Kulshrestha, Vidushi Kumari, Rajesh Mahey, Reeta Sharma, Jai B. Malhotra, Neena Bhatla, Neerja Khadgawat, Rajesh Tandon, Nikhil Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | continuous glucose monitoring system profile of women with gestational diabetes mellitus missed using isolated fasting plasma glucose-based strategies alternative to who 2013 criteria: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptayashdeep continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT singhcharandeep continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT goyalalpesh continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT kalaivanimani continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT bhartijuhi continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT singhalseema continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT kachhawagarima continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT kulshresthavidushi continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT kumarirajesh continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT maheyreeta continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT sharmajaib continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT malhotraneena continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT bhatlaneerja continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT khadgawatrajesh continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy AT tandonnikhil continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy |