Cargando…

Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)-based glycemic parameters between women with normoglycemia and early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) identified on the basis of mild fasting plasma glucose elevation (FPG, 5.1–5....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Yashdeep, Singh, Charandeep, Goyal, Alpesh, Kalaivani, Mani, Bharti, Juhi, Singhal, Seema, Kachhawa, Garima, Kulshrestha, Vidushi, Kumari, Rajesh, Mahey, Reeta, Sharma, Jai B., Malhotra, Neena, Bhatla, Neerja, Khadgawat, Rajesh, Tandon, Nikhil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w
_version_ 1784830957215285248
author Gupta, Yashdeep
Singh, Charandeep
Goyal, Alpesh
Kalaivani, Mani
Bharti, Juhi
Singhal, Seema
Kachhawa, Garima
Kulshrestha, Vidushi
Kumari, Rajesh
Mahey, Reeta
Sharma, Jai B.
Malhotra, Neena
Bhatla, Neerja
Khadgawat, Rajesh
Tandon, Nikhil
author_facet Gupta, Yashdeep
Singh, Charandeep
Goyal, Alpesh
Kalaivani, Mani
Bharti, Juhi
Singhal, Seema
Kachhawa, Garima
Kulshrestha, Vidushi
Kumari, Rajesh
Mahey, Reeta
Sharma, Jai B.
Malhotra, Neena
Bhatla, Neerja
Khadgawat, Rajesh
Tandon, Nikhil
author_sort Gupta, Yashdeep
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)-based glycemic parameters between women with normoglycemia and early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) identified on the basis of mild fasting plasma glucose elevation (FPG, 5.1–5.5 mmol/L) and/or post-load plasma glucose elevation (PLG, 1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included women with singleton pregnancy (8(+0) to 19(+6) weeks of gestation) and normoglycemia or GDM per World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 criteria. We evaluated the glycemic parameters of clinical interest using blinded CGMS evaluation and reported them per standard methodology proposed by Hernandez et al. RESULTS: A total of 87 women (GDM, n = 38) were enrolled at 28.6 ± 4.5 years. Among women with GDM, 10 (26.3%) had isolated mild FPG elevation (5.1–5.5 mmol/L), 10 (26.3%) had isolated PLG elevation (1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L), and 7 (18.4%) had a combination of both. The remaining 11 (28.9%) had elevated FPG (≥ 5.6 mmol/L) with or without PLG elevation. Thus, when an isolated FPG cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L is used to diagnose GDM, 27 (71.0%) women would be perceived as normoglycemic. Such women had significantly higher CGMS parameters of clinical interest, such as 24-h mean glucose, fasting glucose, 1-h and 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), 1-h PPG excursion, and peak PPG. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated FPG threshold, especially the higher cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, can potentially miss a large proportion of women (nearly three-fourths) diagnosed with GDM per WHO 2013 criteria. Eventually, such women fare significantly differently from normoglycemic women in various CGMS parameters of clinical interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9663780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96637802022-11-15 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study Gupta, Yashdeep Singh, Charandeep Goyal, Alpesh Kalaivani, Mani Bharti, Juhi Singhal, Seema Kachhawa, Garima Kulshrestha, Vidushi Kumari, Rajesh Mahey, Reeta Sharma, Jai B. Malhotra, Neena Bhatla, Neerja Khadgawat, Rajesh Tandon, Nikhil Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS)-based glycemic parameters between women with normoglycemia and early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) identified on the basis of mild fasting plasma glucose elevation (FPG, 5.1–5.5 mmol/L) and/or post-load plasma glucose elevation (PLG, 1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included women with singleton pregnancy (8(+0) to 19(+6) weeks of gestation) and normoglycemia or GDM per World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 criteria. We evaluated the glycemic parameters of clinical interest using blinded CGMS evaluation and reported them per standard methodology proposed by Hernandez et al. RESULTS: A total of 87 women (GDM, n = 38) were enrolled at 28.6 ± 4.5 years. Among women with GDM, 10 (26.3%) had isolated mild FPG elevation (5.1–5.5 mmol/L), 10 (26.3%) had isolated PLG elevation (1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L), and 7 (18.4%) had a combination of both. The remaining 11 (28.9%) had elevated FPG (≥ 5.6 mmol/L) with or without PLG elevation. Thus, when an isolated FPG cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L is used to diagnose GDM, 27 (71.0%) women would be perceived as normoglycemic. Such women had significantly higher CGMS parameters of clinical interest, such as 24-h mean glucose, fasting glucose, 1-h and 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG), 1-h PPG excursion, and peak PPG. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated FPG threshold, especially the higher cutoff ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, can potentially miss a large proportion of women (nearly three-fourths) diagnosed with GDM per WHO 2013 criteria. Eventually, such women fare significantly differently from normoglycemic women in various CGMS parameters of clinical interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w. Springer Healthcare 2022-09-14 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9663780/ /pubmed/36103111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Gupta, Yashdeep
Singh, Charandeep
Goyal, Alpesh
Kalaivani, Mani
Bharti, Juhi
Singhal, Seema
Kachhawa, Garima
Kulshrestha, Vidushi
Kumari, Rajesh
Mahey, Reeta
Sharma, Jai B.
Malhotra, Neena
Bhatla, Neerja
Khadgawat, Rajesh
Tandon, Nikhil
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Profile of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Missed Using Isolated Fasting Plasma Glucose-Based Strategies Alternative to WHO 2013 Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort continuous glucose monitoring system profile of women with gestational diabetes mellitus missed using isolated fasting plasma glucose-based strategies alternative to who 2013 criteria: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01317-w
work_keys_str_mv AT guptayashdeep continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT singhcharandeep continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT goyalalpesh continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kalaivanimani continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT bhartijuhi continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT singhalseema continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kachhawagarima continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kulshresthavidushi continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kumarirajesh continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT maheyreeta continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT sharmajaib continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT malhotraneena continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT bhatlaneerja continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT khadgawatrajesh continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT tandonnikhil continuousglucosemonitoringsystemprofileofwomenwithgestationaldiabetesmellitusmissedusingisolatedfastingplasmaglucosebasedstrategiesalternativetowho2013criteriaacrosssectionalstudy