Cargando…

Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task

A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Pizza Ka Yee, Lehtonen, Topi K., Näreaho, Ville, Loukola, Olli J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105466
_version_ 1784830983334264832
author Chow, Pizza Ka Yee
Lehtonen, Topi K.
Näreaho, Ville
Loukola, Olli J.
author_facet Chow, Pizza Ka Yee
Lehtonen, Topi K.
Näreaho, Ville
Loukola, Olli J.
author_sort Chow, Pizza Ka Yee
collection PubMed
description A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9663899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96638992022-11-15 Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task Chow, Pizza Ka Yee Lehtonen, Topi K. Näreaho, Ville Loukola, Olli J. iScience Article A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates. Elsevier 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9663899/ /pubmed/36388992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105466 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chow, Pizza Ka Yee
Lehtonen, Topi K.
Näreaho, Ville
Loukola, Olli J.
Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_full Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_fullStr Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_full_unstemmed Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_short Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
title_sort prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105466
work_keys_str_mv AT chowpizzakayee priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask
AT lehtonentopik priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask
AT nareahoville priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask
AT loukolaollij priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask