Cargando…
Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task
A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105466 |
_version_ | 1784830983334264832 |
---|---|
author | Chow, Pizza Ka Yee Lehtonen, Topi K. Näreaho, Ville Loukola, Olli J. |
author_facet | Chow, Pizza Ka Yee Lehtonen, Topi K. Näreaho, Ville Loukola, Olli J. |
author_sort | Chow, Pizza Ka Yee |
collection | PubMed |
description | A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9663899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96638992022-11-15 Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task Chow, Pizza Ka Yee Lehtonen, Topi K. Näreaho, Ville Loukola, Olli J. iScience Article A small brain and short life allegedly limit cognitive abilities. Our view of invertebrate cognition may also be biased by the choice of experimental stimuli. Here, the stimuli (color) pairs used in the match-to-sample tasks affected the performance of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). We trained the bees to roll a tool, a ball, to a goal that matched its color. Bees trained with a yellow-and-orange/red stimuli pair took more training bouts to reach our color-matching criterion than those trained with a blue-and-yellow stimuli pair. When assessing the bees’ concept learning ability in a transfer test with a novel color, the bees trained with blue and yellow (novel color: orange/red) were highly successful, the bees trained with blue and orange/red (novel color: yellow) did not differ from random, and those trained with yellow and orange/red (novel color: blue) failed the test. These results highlight that stimulus salience can affect our conclusions on test subjects’ cognitive ability. Therefore, we encourage paying attention to stimulus salience (among other factors) when assessing the cognition of invertebrates. Elsevier 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9663899/ /pubmed/36388992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105466 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chow, Pizza Ka Yee Lehtonen, Topi K. Näreaho, Ville Loukola, Olli J. Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_full | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_fullStr | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_full_unstemmed | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_short | Prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
title_sort | prior associations affect bumblebees’ generalization performance in a tool-selection task |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105466 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowpizzakayee priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask AT lehtonentopik priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask AT nareahoville priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask AT loukolaollij priorassociationsaffectbumblebeesgeneralizationperformanceinatoolselectiontask |