Cargando…

Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Research is lacking on the long-term influence of workplace factors on the mental health of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We distributed two online surveys to health care workers between May and October 2020 (T1) and between February and April 2021 (T2). Perc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Na-na, Fan, Teng-teng, Leonhart, Rainer, Fritzsche, Kurt, Liu, Qi, Luo, Lei, Stein, Barbara, Waller, Christiane, Huang, Mingjin, Müller, Markus M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002927
_version_ 1784830988903251968
author Xiong, Na-na
Fan, Teng-teng
Leonhart, Rainer
Fritzsche, Kurt
Liu, Qi
Luo, Lei
Stein, Barbara
Waller, Christiane
Huang, Mingjin
Müller, Markus M.
author_facet Xiong, Na-na
Fan, Teng-teng
Leonhart, Rainer
Fritzsche, Kurt
Liu, Qi
Luo, Lei
Stein, Barbara
Waller, Christiane
Huang, Mingjin
Müller, Markus M.
author_sort Xiong, Na-na
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research is lacking on the long-term influence of workplace factors on the mental health of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We distributed two online surveys to health care workers between May and October 2020 (T1) and between February and April 2021 (T2). Perceived stress, coronavirus-related risks, and workplace factors were measured via self-report questionnaires at both time points. We conducted hierarchical linear regression to investigate the predictive factors for high stress. RESULTS: A total of 2,110 participants from seven countries and 4,240 participants from nine countries were enrolled at T1 and T2, respectively. Among them, 612 participated in both surveys. We called this cohort T1 + T2. High stress was reported in 53.8 and 61.6% of participants at T1 and T2, respectively. In cohort T1 + T2, compared with the baseline, the level of stress rose significantly (6.0 ± 2.9 vs. 6.4 ± 3.1), as did health/safety in the workplace (3.9 ± 0.8 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7). Unfortunately, we did not detect any significant difference concerning support in the workplace. Among all factors at baseline, being older than 35 [β (95% CI) = −0.92 (−1.45, −0.40)], support [−0.80 (−1.29, −0.32)], and health/safety in the workplace [−0.33 (−0.65, −0.01)] were independent protective factors, while a positive history of mental disorders [0.81 (0.26, 1.37)] and rejection in private life [0.86 (0.48, 1.25)] were risk factors for high stress at T2. CONCLUSION: To relieve the high stress of health care workers, organizational-level approaches should be implemented, especially measures designed to enhance support, health/safety in the workplace, and to reduce the rejection of the public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9663923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96639232022-11-15 Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study Xiong, Na-na Fan, Teng-teng Leonhart, Rainer Fritzsche, Kurt Liu, Qi Luo, Lei Stein, Barbara Waller, Christiane Huang, Mingjin Müller, Markus M. Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Research is lacking on the long-term influence of workplace factors on the mental health of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We distributed two online surveys to health care workers between May and October 2020 (T1) and between February and April 2021 (T2). Perceived stress, coronavirus-related risks, and workplace factors were measured via self-report questionnaires at both time points. We conducted hierarchical linear regression to investigate the predictive factors for high stress. RESULTS: A total of 2,110 participants from seven countries and 4,240 participants from nine countries were enrolled at T1 and T2, respectively. Among them, 612 participated in both surveys. We called this cohort T1 + T2. High stress was reported in 53.8 and 61.6% of participants at T1 and T2, respectively. In cohort T1 + T2, compared with the baseline, the level of stress rose significantly (6.0 ± 2.9 vs. 6.4 ± 3.1), as did health/safety in the workplace (3.9 ± 0.8 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7). Unfortunately, we did not detect any significant difference concerning support in the workplace. Among all factors at baseline, being older than 35 [β (95% CI) = −0.92 (−1.45, −0.40)], support [−0.80 (−1.29, −0.32)], and health/safety in the workplace [−0.33 (−0.65, −0.01)] were independent protective factors, while a positive history of mental disorders [0.81 (0.26, 1.37)] and rejection in private life [0.86 (0.48, 1.25)] were risk factors for high stress at T2. CONCLUSION: To relieve the high stress of health care workers, organizational-level approaches should be implemented, especially measures designed to enhance support, health/safety in the workplace, and to reduce the rejection of the public. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9663923/ /pubmed/36388352 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002927 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiong, Fan, Leonhart, Fritzsche, Liu, Luo, Stein, Waller, Huang, Müller and The Cope-Corona Working Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Xiong, Na-na
Fan, Teng-teng
Leonhart, Rainer
Fritzsche, Kurt
Liu, Qi
Luo, Lei
Stein, Barbara
Waller, Christiane
Huang, Mingjin
Müller, Markus M.
Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study
title Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study
title_full Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study
title_fullStr Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study
title_short Workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: First interim results of a multicenter follow-up study
title_sort workplace factors can predict the stress levels of healthcare workers during the covid-19 pandemic: first interim results of a multicenter follow-up study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9663923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388352
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002927
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongnana workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT fantengteng workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT leonhartrainer workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT fritzschekurt workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT liuqi workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT luolei workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT steinbarbara workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT wallerchristiane workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT huangmingjin workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT mullermarkusm workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy
AT workplacefactorscanpredictthestresslevelsofhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemicfirstinterimresultsofamulticenterfollowupstudy