Cargando…
A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies
Fake news has become an industry on its own, where users paid to write fake news and create clickbait content to allure the audience. Apparently, the detection of fake news is a crucial problem and several studies have proposed machine-learning-based techniques to combat fake news. Existing surveys...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36406145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10207-022-00625-3 |
_version_ | 1784831018399694848 |
---|---|
author | Rastogi, Shubhangi Bansal, Divya |
author_facet | Rastogi, Shubhangi Bansal, Divya |
author_sort | Rastogi, Shubhangi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fake news has become an industry on its own, where users paid to write fake news and create clickbait content to allure the audience. Apparently, the detection of fake news is a crucial problem and several studies have proposed machine-learning-based techniques to combat fake news. Existing surveys present the review of proposed solutions, while this survey presents several aspects that are required to be considered before designing an effective solution. To this aim, we provide a comprehensive overview of false news detection. The survey presents (1) a clarity to problem definition by explaining different types of false information (like fake news, rumor, clickbait, satire, and hoax) with real-life examples, (2) a list of actors involved in spreading false information, (3) actions taken by service providers, (4) a list of publicly available datasets for fake news in three different formats, i.e., texts, images, and videos, (5) a novel three-phase detection model based on the time of detection, (6) four different taxonomies to classify research based on new-fangled viewpoints in order to provide a succinct roadmap for future, and (7) key bibliometric indicators. In a nutshell, the survey focuses on three key aspects represented as the three T’s: Typology of false information, Time of detection, and Taxonomies to classify research. Finally, by reviewing and summarizing several studies on fake news, we outline some potential research directions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9664051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96640512022-11-14 A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies Rastogi, Shubhangi Bansal, Divya Int J Inf Secur Survey Fake news has become an industry on its own, where users paid to write fake news and create clickbait content to allure the audience. Apparently, the detection of fake news is a crucial problem and several studies have proposed machine-learning-based techniques to combat fake news. Existing surveys present the review of proposed solutions, while this survey presents several aspects that are required to be considered before designing an effective solution. To this aim, we provide a comprehensive overview of false news detection. The survey presents (1) a clarity to problem definition by explaining different types of false information (like fake news, rumor, clickbait, satire, and hoax) with real-life examples, (2) a list of actors involved in spreading false information, (3) actions taken by service providers, (4) a list of publicly available datasets for fake news in three different formats, i.e., texts, images, and videos, (5) a novel three-phase detection model based on the time of detection, (6) four different taxonomies to classify research based on new-fangled viewpoints in order to provide a succinct roadmap for future, and (7) key bibliometric indicators. In a nutshell, the survey focuses on three key aspects represented as the three T’s: Typology of false information, Time of detection, and Taxonomies to classify research. Finally, by reviewing and summarizing several studies on fake news, we outline some potential research directions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-15 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9664051/ /pubmed/36406145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10207-022-00625-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Survey Rastogi, Shubhangi Bansal, Divya A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies |
title | A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies |
title_full | A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies |
title_fullStr | A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies |
title_full_unstemmed | A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies |
title_short | A review on fake news detection 3T’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies |
title_sort | review on fake news detection 3t’s: typology, time of detection, taxonomies |
topic | Survey |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36406145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10207-022-00625-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rastogishubhangi areviewonfakenewsdetection3tstypologytimeofdetectiontaxonomies AT bansaldivya areviewonfakenewsdetection3tstypologytimeofdetectiontaxonomies AT rastogishubhangi reviewonfakenewsdetection3tstypologytimeofdetectiontaxonomies AT bansaldivya reviewonfakenewsdetection3tstypologytimeofdetectiontaxonomies |