Cargando…

A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing

This study analyzes the compositions of Hong Kong English as a second language (ESL) learners and English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Mainland China in terms of lexical and syntactic features. A program based on the CoreNLP was developed and used to analyze written language texts, and di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chao, Kang, Shumin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090
_version_ 1784831053779697664
author Zhang, Chao
Kang, Shumin
author_facet Zhang, Chao
Kang, Shumin
author_sort Zhang, Chao
collection PubMed
description This study analyzes the compositions of Hong Kong English as a second language (ESL) learners and English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Mainland China in terms of lexical and syntactic features. A program based on the CoreNLP was developed and used to analyze written language texts, and differences in tags of parts of speech and syntactic dependencies between the two groups of texts were compared statistically to examine differences in the lexical and syntactic features of the learners’ written language. The results show significant differences in the lexical and syntactic features of learners’ writing. Specifically, in EFL learners’ writing, there is a salient group pattern of higher lexical diversity, whereas ESL compositions are more flexible in vocabulary use with higher information density, in that they use more syntactic phrases and content words. In terms of syntax, Hong Kong ESL students use more adverbials and adverbial clauses, which is advantageous in syntactic simplicity and readability over their counterparts, whereas Mainland China EFL students prefer using more specific expressions to demonstrate syntactic relations. Compared to EFL compositions, ESL compositions are more informative, coherent, and grammatical in lexical features and more readable in syntactic features, which require more attention and further improvements in terms of EFL teaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9664217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96642172022-11-15 A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing Zhang, Chao Kang, Shumin Front Psychol Psychology This study analyzes the compositions of Hong Kong English as a second language (ESL) learners and English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Mainland China in terms of lexical and syntactic features. A program based on the CoreNLP was developed and used to analyze written language texts, and differences in tags of parts of speech and syntactic dependencies between the two groups of texts were compared statistically to examine differences in the lexical and syntactic features of the learners’ written language. The results show significant differences in the lexical and syntactic features of learners’ writing. Specifically, in EFL learners’ writing, there is a salient group pattern of higher lexical diversity, whereas ESL compositions are more flexible in vocabulary use with higher information density, in that they use more syntactic phrases and content words. In terms of syntax, Hong Kong ESL students use more adverbials and adverbial clauses, which is advantageous in syntactic simplicity and readability over their counterparts, whereas Mainland China EFL students prefer using more specific expressions to demonstrate syntactic relations. Compared to EFL compositions, ESL compositions are more informative, coherent, and grammatical in lexical features and more readable in syntactic features, which require more attention and further improvements in terms of EFL teaching. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9664217/ /pubmed/36389505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang and Kang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Zhang, Chao
Kang, Shumin
A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
title A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
title_full A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
title_fullStr A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
title_short A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
title_sort comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of esl versus efl learners’ writing
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchao acomparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting
AT kangshumin acomparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting
AT zhangchao comparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting
AT kangshumin comparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting