Cargando…
A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
This study analyzes the compositions of Hong Kong English as a second language (ESL) learners and English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Mainland China in terms of lexical and syntactic features. A program based on the CoreNLP was developed and used to analyze written language texts, and di...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090 |
_version_ | 1784831053779697664 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Chao Kang, Shumin |
author_facet | Zhang, Chao Kang, Shumin |
author_sort | Zhang, Chao |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study analyzes the compositions of Hong Kong English as a second language (ESL) learners and English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Mainland China in terms of lexical and syntactic features. A program based on the CoreNLP was developed and used to analyze written language texts, and differences in tags of parts of speech and syntactic dependencies between the two groups of texts were compared statistically to examine differences in the lexical and syntactic features of the learners’ written language. The results show significant differences in the lexical and syntactic features of learners’ writing. Specifically, in EFL learners’ writing, there is a salient group pattern of higher lexical diversity, whereas ESL compositions are more flexible in vocabulary use with higher information density, in that they use more syntactic phrases and content words. In terms of syntax, Hong Kong ESL students use more adverbials and adverbial clauses, which is advantageous in syntactic simplicity and readability over their counterparts, whereas Mainland China EFL students prefer using more specific expressions to demonstrate syntactic relations. Compared to EFL compositions, ESL compositions are more informative, coherent, and grammatical in lexical features and more readable in syntactic features, which require more attention and further improvements in terms of EFL teaching. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9664217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96642172022-11-15 A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing Zhang, Chao Kang, Shumin Front Psychol Psychology This study analyzes the compositions of Hong Kong English as a second language (ESL) learners and English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Mainland China in terms of lexical and syntactic features. A program based on the CoreNLP was developed and used to analyze written language texts, and differences in tags of parts of speech and syntactic dependencies between the two groups of texts were compared statistically to examine differences in the lexical and syntactic features of the learners’ written language. The results show significant differences in the lexical and syntactic features of learners’ writing. Specifically, in EFL learners’ writing, there is a salient group pattern of higher lexical diversity, whereas ESL compositions are more flexible in vocabulary use with higher information density, in that they use more syntactic phrases and content words. In terms of syntax, Hong Kong ESL students use more adverbials and adverbial clauses, which is advantageous in syntactic simplicity and readability over their counterparts, whereas Mainland China EFL students prefer using more specific expressions to demonstrate syntactic relations. Compared to EFL compositions, ESL compositions are more informative, coherent, and grammatical in lexical features and more readable in syntactic features, which require more attention and further improvements in terms of EFL teaching. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9664217/ /pubmed/36389505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang and Kang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhang, Chao Kang, Shumin A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing |
title | A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing |
title_full | A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing |
title_fullStr | A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing |
title_short | A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing |
title_sort | comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of esl versus efl learners’ writing |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangchao acomparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting AT kangshumin acomparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting AT zhangchao comparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting AT kangshumin comparativestudyonlexicalandsyntacticfeaturesofeslversusefllearnerswriting |