Cargando…

Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial

OBJECTIVE: The Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) intervention is a physiotherapy programme for patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone neck dissection. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand if the intervention was useful, acceptable and whether it was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fordham, Beth, Smith, Toby O, Lamb, Sarah, Morris, Alana, Winter, Stuart C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36375975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064269
_version_ 1784831071090638848
author Fordham, Beth
Smith, Toby O
Lamb, Sarah
Morris, Alana
Winter, Stuart C
author_facet Fordham, Beth
Smith, Toby O
Lamb, Sarah
Morris, Alana
Winter, Stuart C
author_sort Fordham, Beth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) intervention is a physiotherapy programme for patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone neck dissection. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand if the intervention was useful, acceptable and whether it was feasible to conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: This qualitative study was embedded within the GRRAND-Feasibility (GRRAND-F) Study. SETTING: Participants were recruited from four acute National Health Service hospitals in England between 2020 and 2021. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed four usual care and four intervention patient-participants from a single study site (Oxford). Six were male, two were female. All were white British ethnicity. We interviewed two physiotherapists from Oxford who delivered the GRRAND-F intervention, and physiotherapists from Birmingham, Poole and Norwich who were trained to deliver the intervention but were not able to deliver it within the study time frame. RESULTS: The analysis identified five themes: (1) Acceptability, (2) Adherence, (3) Outcomes, (4) Feasibility and (5) Stand-alone themes (prehabilitation, video consultations, healthcare use). Patient-participants and physiotherapist-participants agreed that usual care was not meeting patients’ rehabilitation needs. The GRRAND intervention provided biopsychosocial support. In comparison to the usual care group, patient-participants who received the intervention were more confident that they could perform rehabilitation exercises and were more motivated to engage in long-term adaptive behaviour change. Physiotherapists felt they needed more administrative support to participate in an RCT. CONCLUSION: Participants felt that usual care was insufficient. GRRAND provided much needed, biopsychosocial support to patients. Participants were supportive that it would be feasible to test GRRAND in an RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11979997.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9664296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96642962022-11-15 Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial Fordham, Beth Smith, Toby O Lamb, Sarah Morris, Alana Winter, Stuart C BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVE: The Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) intervention is a physiotherapy programme for patients with head and neck cancer who have undergone neck dissection. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand if the intervention was useful, acceptable and whether it was feasible to conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: This qualitative study was embedded within the GRRAND-Feasibility (GRRAND-F) Study. SETTING: Participants were recruited from four acute National Health Service hospitals in England between 2020 and 2021. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed four usual care and four intervention patient-participants from a single study site (Oxford). Six were male, two were female. All were white British ethnicity. We interviewed two physiotherapists from Oxford who delivered the GRRAND-F intervention, and physiotherapists from Birmingham, Poole and Norwich who were trained to deliver the intervention but were not able to deliver it within the study time frame. RESULTS: The analysis identified five themes: (1) Acceptability, (2) Adherence, (3) Outcomes, (4) Feasibility and (5) Stand-alone themes (prehabilitation, video consultations, healthcare use). Patient-participants and physiotherapist-participants agreed that usual care was not meeting patients’ rehabilitation needs. The GRRAND intervention provided biopsychosocial support. In comparison to the usual care group, patient-participants who received the intervention were more confident that they could perform rehabilitation exercises and were more motivated to engage in long-term adaptive behaviour change. Physiotherapists felt they needed more administrative support to participate in an RCT. CONCLUSION: Participants felt that usual care was insufficient. GRRAND provided much needed, biopsychosocial support to patients. Participants were supportive that it would be feasible to test GRRAND in an RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11979997. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9664296/ /pubmed/36375975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064269 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Oncology
Fordham, Beth
Smith, Toby O
Lamb, Sarah
Morris, Alana
Winter, Stuart C
Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial
title Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial
title_full Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial
title_fullStr Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial
title_short Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the Getting Recovery Right After Neck Dissection (GRRAND) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial
title_sort patient and physiotherapist perceptions of the getting recovery right after neck dissection (grrand) rehabilitation intervention: a qualitative interview study embedded within a feasibility trial
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36375975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064269
work_keys_str_mv AT fordhambeth patientandphysiotherapistperceptionsofthegettingrecoveryrightafterneckdissectiongrrandrehabilitationinterventionaqualitativeinterviewstudyembeddedwithinafeasibilitytrial
AT smithtobyo patientandphysiotherapistperceptionsofthegettingrecoveryrightafterneckdissectiongrrandrehabilitationinterventionaqualitativeinterviewstudyembeddedwithinafeasibilitytrial
AT lambsarah patientandphysiotherapistperceptionsofthegettingrecoveryrightafterneckdissectiongrrandrehabilitationinterventionaqualitativeinterviewstudyembeddedwithinafeasibilitytrial
AT morrisalana patientandphysiotherapistperceptionsofthegettingrecoveryrightafterneckdissectiongrrandrehabilitationinterventionaqualitativeinterviewstudyembeddedwithinafeasibilitytrial
AT winterstuartc patientandphysiotherapistperceptionsofthegettingrecoveryrightafterneckdissectiongrrandrehabilitationinterventionaqualitativeinterviewstudyembeddedwithinafeasibilitytrial