Cargando…

Reconstruction of vertical alveolar ridge deficiencies utilizing a high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane /clinical impact of flap dehiscence on treatment outcomes: case series/

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of membrane exposure during vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) utilizing guided bone regeneration with a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane and a tent-pole space maintaining approach by registering radiographic volumetric, lin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palkovics, Daniel, Bolya-Orosz, Fanni, Pinter, Csaba, Molnar, Balint, Windisch, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36376891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02513-7
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of membrane exposure during vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) utilizing guided bone regeneration with a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane and a tent-pole space maintaining approach by registering radiographic volumetric, linear and morphological changes. METHODS: In 8 cases alveolar ridge defects were accessed utilizing a split-thickness flap design. Following flap elevation VRA was performed with tent-pole space maintaining approach utilizing the combination of a non-reinforced d-PTFE membrane and a composite graft (1:1 ratio of autogenous bone chips and bovine derived xenografts). Three-dimensional radiographic evaluation of hard tissue changes was carried out with the sequence of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image segmentation, spatial registration and 3D subtraction analysis. RESULTS: Class I or class II membrane exposure was observed in four cases. Average hard tissue gain was found to be 0.70 cm(3) ± 0.31 cm(3) and 0.82 cm(3) ± 0.40 cm(3) with and without membrane exposure resulting in a 17% difference. Vertical hard tissue gain averaged 4.06 mm ± 0.56 mm and 3.55 mm ± 0.43 mm in case of submerged and open healing, respectively. Difference in this regard was 14% between the two groups. Horizontal ridge width at 9-month follow-up was 5.89 mm ± 0.51 mm and 5.61 mm ± 1.21 mm with and without a membrane exposure respectively, resulting in a 5% difference. CONCLUSIONS: With the help of the currently reported 3D radiographic evaluation method, it can be concluded that exposure of the new-generation d-PTFE membrane had less negative impact on clinical results compared to literature data reporting on expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes.