Cargando…
The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study
BACKGROUND: The impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes was still controversial. Our objective is to investigate the impact of the presence of SERa on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36376855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05141-9 |
_version_ | 1784831160540463104 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Tingfeng Yu, Wenchang Ou, Songbang Lu, Jinyu Li, Ruiqi Zhao, Mingpeng Chan, Yiu Leung Wang, Wenjun |
author_facet | Fang, Tingfeng Yu, Wenchang Ou, Songbang Lu, Jinyu Li, Ruiqi Zhao, Mingpeng Chan, Yiu Leung Wang, Wenjun |
author_sort | Fang, Tingfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes was still controversial. Our objective is to investigate the impact of the presence of SERa on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 1,090 fresh ICSI cycles from 944 patients between January 2016 and June 2020 were included. Outcomes from clinical, embryological and neonatal aspects were compared between SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as between SERa + and SERa- oocytes. RESULTS: The total gonadotropin (Gn) dose, number of oocytes retrieved, serum estradiol concentration and number of the available embryo were significantly higher in SERa + cycles than in SERa- cycles (P < 0.05). Comparable two pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate and poly-pronucleus zygote rate were shown in SERa + and SERa- cycles (P > 0.05), but which were higher in SERa + oocytes than in SERa- oocytes (P < 0.05). No statistical difference in blastocyst formation rate was found in SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as in SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). Good-quality embryo rate was statistically higher in SERa- cycles than in SERa + cycles (P < 0.05), but the difference was comparable between SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). No statistical difference in clinical pregnancy rate, spontaneous abortion rate, live birth rate and premature delivery rate were found in SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as in SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). The implantation rate was comparable in SERa + and SERa- cycles (P > 0.05), but it is higher in the group of only SERa- embryo transfer when compared with the group of mixed SERa + and SERa- embryo transfer (P < 0.05). 159 newborns in SERa + cycles and 140 newborns in SERa- cycles were followed up. Comparable newborn malformation rate was observed between SERa + and SERa- cycles and oocytes (P > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed number of oocytes and total dose of Gn were risk factors for SERa occurrence (aOR = 1.05 and 1.55, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Oocyte's SERa is correlated with a number of oocytes retrieved and higher Gn dose, but it does not affect pregnancy outcomes and increase newborn malformation rate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05141-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9664725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96647252022-11-15 The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study Fang, Tingfeng Yu, Wenchang Ou, Songbang Lu, Jinyu Li, Ruiqi Zhao, Mingpeng Chan, Yiu Leung Wang, Wenjun BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: The impact of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates (SERa) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes was still controversial. Our objective is to investigate the impact of the presence of SERa on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 1,090 fresh ICSI cycles from 944 patients between January 2016 and June 2020 were included. Outcomes from clinical, embryological and neonatal aspects were compared between SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as between SERa + and SERa- oocytes. RESULTS: The total gonadotropin (Gn) dose, number of oocytes retrieved, serum estradiol concentration and number of the available embryo were significantly higher in SERa + cycles than in SERa- cycles (P < 0.05). Comparable two pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate and poly-pronucleus zygote rate were shown in SERa + and SERa- cycles (P > 0.05), but which were higher in SERa + oocytes than in SERa- oocytes (P < 0.05). No statistical difference in blastocyst formation rate was found in SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as in SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). Good-quality embryo rate was statistically higher in SERa- cycles than in SERa + cycles (P < 0.05), but the difference was comparable between SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). No statistical difference in clinical pregnancy rate, spontaneous abortion rate, live birth rate and premature delivery rate were found in SERa + and SERa- cycles as well as in SERa + and SERa- oocytes (P > 0.05). The implantation rate was comparable in SERa + and SERa- cycles (P > 0.05), but it is higher in the group of only SERa- embryo transfer when compared with the group of mixed SERa + and SERa- embryo transfer (P < 0.05). 159 newborns in SERa + cycles and 140 newborns in SERa- cycles were followed up. Comparable newborn malformation rate was observed between SERa + and SERa- cycles and oocytes (P > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed number of oocytes and total dose of Gn were risk factors for SERa occurrence (aOR = 1.05 and 1.55, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Oocyte's SERa is correlated with a number of oocytes retrieved and higher Gn dose, but it does not affect pregnancy outcomes and increase newborn malformation rate. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05141-9. BioMed Central 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9664725/ /pubmed/36376855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05141-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Fang, Tingfeng Yu, Wenchang Ou, Songbang Lu, Jinyu Li, Ruiqi Zhao, Mingpeng Chan, Yiu Leung Wang, Wenjun The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study |
title | The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study |
title_full | The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study |
title_short | The impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study |
title_sort | impact of oocytes containing smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates on assisted reproductive outcomes: a cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36376855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05141-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangtingfeng theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT yuwenchang theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT ousongbang theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT lujinyu theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT liruiqi theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT zhaomingpeng theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT chanyiuleung theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT wangwenjun theimpactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT fangtingfeng impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT yuwenchang impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT ousongbang impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT lujinyu impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT liruiqi impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT zhaomingpeng impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT chanyiuleung impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy AT wangwenjun impactofoocytescontainingsmoothendoplasmicreticulumaggregatesonassistedreproductiveoutcomesacohortstudy |