Cargando…
How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures
BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BST) is an essential and traditional clinical teaching format. It has been subject to various impediments and has transformed over time. Besides a decrease in bedside time, there has also been a didactic diversification. In order to use time at the bedside effectively a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36380308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03855-0 |
_version_ | 1784831161799802880 |
---|---|
author | Blaschke, Anna-Lena Rubisch, Hannah P. K. Schindler, Ann-Kathrin Berberat, Pascal O. Gartmeier, Martin |
author_facet | Blaschke, Anna-Lena Rubisch, Hannah P. K. Schindler, Ann-Kathrin Berberat, Pascal O. Gartmeier, Martin |
author_sort | Blaschke, Anna-Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BST) is an essential and traditional clinical teaching format. It has been subject to various impediments and has transformed over time. Besides a decrease in bedside time, there has also been a didactic diversification. In order to use time at the bedside effectively and understand the current design of BST, we here offer an evidence-based insight into how BST is practiced. This may serve as a basis for a refinement of its didactic design. METHODS: In the current study, we investigate the interrelationships between learning content and the social as well as spatial structures of BST. To this end, we have empirically analysed almost 80 hours of video material from a total of 36 BST sessions with good interrater reliability. RESULTS: BST lasted on average 125 min, most of which was spent in plenary and less than a third of the time at the patient’s bedside. History taking was primarily practiced at the bedside while case presentations, clinical reasoning and theoretical knowledge were largely taught away from the patient. Clinical examination took place to a similar extent in the patient’s room and in the theory room. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the filmed BSTs are not purely “bedside”, the teaching format investigated here is a typical example of undergraduate medical education. In order to maximize the teaching time available, a suitable learning space should be provided in addition to the bedside. Moreover, the clinical examination should be revised in its general sequence prior to the BST, and conscious decisions should be made regarding the social structure so as to optimize the potential of small groups and plenary sessions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9664733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96647332022-11-15 How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures Blaschke, Anna-Lena Rubisch, Hannah P. K. Schindler, Ann-Kathrin Berberat, Pascal O. Gartmeier, Martin BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Bedside teaching (BST) is an essential and traditional clinical teaching format. It has been subject to various impediments and has transformed over time. Besides a decrease in bedside time, there has also been a didactic diversification. In order to use time at the bedside effectively and understand the current design of BST, we here offer an evidence-based insight into how BST is practiced. This may serve as a basis for a refinement of its didactic design. METHODS: In the current study, we investigate the interrelationships between learning content and the social as well as spatial structures of BST. To this end, we have empirically analysed almost 80 hours of video material from a total of 36 BST sessions with good interrater reliability. RESULTS: BST lasted on average 125 min, most of which was spent in plenary and less than a third of the time at the patient’s bedside. History taking was primarily practiced at the bedside while case presentations, clinical reasoning and theoretical knowledge were largely taught away from the patient. Clinical examination took place to a similar extent in the patient’s room and in the theory room. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the filmed BSTs are not purely “bedside”, the teaching format investigated here is a typical example of undergraduate medical education. In order to maximize the teaching time available, a suitable learning space should be provided in addition to the bedside. Moreover, the clinical examination should be revised in its general sequence prior to the BST, and conscious decisions should be made regarding the social structure so as to optimize the potential of small groups and plenary sessions. BioMed Central 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9664733/ /pubmed/36380308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03855-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Blaschke, Anna-Lena Rubisch, Hannah P. K. Schindler, Ann-Kathrin Berberat, Pascal O. Gartmeier, Martin How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures |
title | How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures |
title_full | How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures |
title_fullStr | How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures |
title_full_unstemmed | How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures |
title_short | How is modern bedside teaching structured? A video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures |
title_sort | how is modern bedside teaching structured? a video analysis of learning content, social and spatial structures |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36380308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03855-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blaschkeannalena howismodernbedsideteachingstructuredavideoanalysisoflearningcontentsocialandspatialstructures AT rubischhannahpk howismodernbedsideteachingstructuredavideoanalysisoflearningcontentsocialandspatialstructures AT schindlerannkathrin howismodernbedsideteachingstructuredavideoanalysisoflearningcontentsocialandspatialstructures AT berberatpascalo howismodernbedsideteachingstructuredavideoanalysisoflearningcontentsocialandspatialstructures AT gartmeiermartin howismodernbedsideteachingstructuredavideoanalysisoflearningcontentsocialandspatialstructures |