Cargando…
Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19
The pandemic linked to Covid-19 let the notion of freedom rights arise: freedom of expression, of movement, of vaccination, etc. In this context, this article focuses on the vaccination process. Between pro-vaccination, “anti-vax” and undecided, the question of freedom, of the individual decisional...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Masson SAS.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664757/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kine.2022.10.007 |
_version_ | 1784831167258689536 |
---|---|
author | Cercleron, Fabrice |
author_facet | Cercleron, Fabrice |
author_sort | Cercleron, Fabrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | The pandemic linked to Covid-19 let the notion of freedom rights arise: freedom of expression, of movement, of vaccination, etc. In this context, this article focuses on the vaccination process. Between pro-vaccination, “anti-vax” and undecided, the question of freedom, of the individual decisional autonomy of the citizen and the collective/societal benefit to be oriented towards a choice arises. The dispensation of information, via the media (television, written, radio) and the multitude of sources available on the Web, may or may not facilitate decision-making. But what about the position of caregivers? Beyond the principle of wanting to care without counting, the Hippocratic oath (“I will respect all persons, their autonomy and their will, without any discrimination according to their condition or their convictions”), is it easy to keep these convictions? Is it legitimate to ask the question “Would it be ethical to prioritize vaccinated patients in intensive care?”, a question joined by certain doctors of Wallonia (Belgium) in an approach of ethical debate. A look at the literature tries to understand this questioning, which can be both positive and disturbing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9664757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier Masson SAS. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96647572022-11-14 Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19 Cercleron, Fabrice Kinésithérapie, La Revue Article The pandemic linked to Covid-19 let the notion of freedom rights arise: freedom of expression, of movement, of vaccination, etc. In this context, this article focuses on the vaccination process. Between pro-vaccination, “anti-vax” and undecided, the question of freedom, of the individual decisional autonomy of the citizen and the collective/societal benefit to be oriented towards a choice arises. The dispensation of information, via the media (television, written, radio) and the multitude of sources available on the Web, may or may not facilitate decision-making. But what about the position of caregivers? Beyond the principle of wanting to care without counting, the Hippocratic oath (“I will respect all persons, their autonomy and their will, without any discrimination according to their condition or their convictions”), is it easy to keep these convictions? Is it legitimate to ask the question “Would it be ethical to prioritize vaccinated patients in intensive care?”, a question joined by certain doctors of Wallonia (Belgium) in an approach of ethical debate. A look at the literature tries to understand this questioning, which can be both positive and disturbing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. Elsevier Masson SAS. 2023-01 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9664757/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kine.2022.10.007 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Cercleron, Fabrice Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19 |
title | Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19 |
title_full | Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19 |
title_fullStr | Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19 |
title_short | Regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie Covid-19 |
title_sort | regard de soignant, regard de citoyen à propos de la pandémie covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664757/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kine.2022.10.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cercleronfabrice regarddesoignantregarddecitoyenaproposdelapandemiecovid19 |