Cargando…
Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter]
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389635 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S396038 |
_version_ | 1784831189449703424 |
---|---|
author | Gonul, Saban Eker, Serhat |
author_facet | Gonul, Saban Eker, Serhat |
author_sort | Gonul, Saban |
collection | PubMed |
description | |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9664908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96649082022-11-15 Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter] Gonul, Saban Eker, Serhat Clin Ophthalmol Letter Dove 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9664908/ /pubmed/36389635 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S396038 Text en © 2022 Gonul and Eker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Letter Gonul, Saban Eker, Serhat Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter] |
title | Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter] |
title_full | Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter] |
title_fullStr | Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter] |
title_full_unstemmed | Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter] |
title_short | Comments on: Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade for Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology – Is It Still Relevant? [Letter] |
title_sort | comments on: internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade for full-thickness macular holes of different etiology – is it still relevant? [letter] |
topic | Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36389635 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S396038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonulsaban commentsoninternallimitingmembranepeelingandgastamponadeforfullthicknessmacularholesofdifferentetiologyisitstillrelevantletter AT ekerserhat commentsoninternallimitingmembranepeelingandgastamponadeforfullthicknessmacularholesofdifferentetiologyisitstillrelevantletter |