Cargando…

Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data

BACKGROUND: Despite national guideline recommendations for universal biomarker testing (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and mismatch repair and microsatellite instability [MMR/MSI]) in all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), little is known regarding adherence to these recommendations in routine pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iyer, Pritish, Deng, Mengying, Handorf, Elizabeth A, Nakhoda, Shazia, Dotan, Efrat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkac065
_version_ 1784831199727845376
author Iyer, Pritish
Deng, Mengying
Handorf, Elizabeth A
Nakhoda, Shazia
Dotan, Efrat
author_facet Iyer, Pritish
Deng, Mengying
Handorf, Elizabeth A
Nakhoda, Shazia
Dotan, Efrat
author_sort Iyer, Pritish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite national guideline recommendations for universal biomarker testing (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and mismatch repair and microsatellite instability [MMR/MSI]) in all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), little is known regarding adherence to these recommendations in routine practice. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with mCRC diagnosed between January 1, 2013, and December 27, 2018, from a de-identified electronic health record–derived database. We analyzed disparities in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI testing by race, age, sex, and insurance status using χ(2) tests and t tests. We evaluated changes in biomarker testing over time with attention to changes around dates of landmark publications and guideline updates using χ(2) tests and Cochran-Armitage tests. RESULTS: A total of 20 333 patients were identified of which 66.6% had test results for any biomarker. Rates of test results for all 4 biomarkers statistically significantly increased over time (P < .001). However, as of June 30, 2018, the rate of test results was only 46% for NRAS, 56% for KRAS, and 46% for BRAF. As of December 31, 2017, the rate of MMR/MSI testing was 59%. Higher documented testing rates were associated with younger age, lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and commercial insurance. There were no clinically meaningful and/or statistically significant differences in documented testing rates by tumor sidedness, race, sex, or initial stage. CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates of documented testing for NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI in mCRC was seen between 2013 and 2018 reflecting adoption of guideline recommendations. However, the rate of documented testing remains lower than expected and warrants additional research to understand the extent to which this may represent a clinical practice quality concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9664970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96649702022-11-14 Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data Iyer, Pritish Deng, Mengying Handorf, Elizabeth A Nakhoda, Shazia Dotan, Efrat JNCI Cancer Spectr Article BACKGROUND: Despite national guideline recommendations for universal biomarker testing (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and mismatch repair and microsatellite instability [MMR/MSI]) in all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), little is known regarding adherence to these recommendations in routine practice. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with mCRC diagnosed between January 1, 2013, and December 27, 2018, from a de-identified electronic health record–derived database. We analyzed disparities in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI testing by race, age, sex, and insurance status using χ(2) tests and t tests. We evaluated changes in biomarker testing over time with attention to changes around dates of landmark publications and guideline updates using χ(2) tests and Cochran-Armitage tests. RESULTS: A total of 20 333 patients were identified of which 66.6% had test results for any biomarker. Rates of test results for all 4 biomarkers statistically significantly increased over time (P < .001). However, as of June 30, 2018, the rate of test results was only 46% for NRAS, 56% for KRAS, and 46% for BRAF. As of December 31, 2017, the rate of MMR/MSI testing was 59%. Higher documented testing rates were associated with younger age, lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and commercial insurance. There were no clinically meaningful and/or statistically significant differences in documented testing rates by tumor sidedness, race, sex, or initial stage. CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates of documented testing for NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI in mCRC was seen between 2013 and 2018 reflecting adoption of guideline recommendations. However, the rate of documented testing remains lower than expected and warrants additional research to understand the extent to which this may represent a clinical practice quality concern. Oxford University Press 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9664970/ /pubmed/36149298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkac065 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Iyer, Pritish
Deng, Mengying
Handorf, Elizabeth A
Nakhoda, Shazia
Dotan, Efrat
Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data
title Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data
title_full Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data
title_fullStr Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data
title_short Assessing Oncologists’ Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data
title_sort assessing oncologists’ adoption of biomarker testing in metastatic colorectal cancer using real-world data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36149298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkac065
work_keys_str_mv AT iyerpritish assessingoncologistsadoptionofbiomarkertestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerusingrealworlddata
AT dengmengying assessingoncologistsadoptionofbiomarkertestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerusingrealworlddata
AT handorfelizabetha assessingoncologistsadoptionofbiomarkertestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerusingrealworlddata
AT nakhodashazia assessingoncologistsadoptionofbiomarkertestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerusingrealworlddata
AT dotanefrat assessingoncologistsadoptionofbiomarkertestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerusingrealworlddata