Cargando…

A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries

Understanding how health systems respond to shocks has become a pressing need to strengthen response efforts. With already fragmented and disrupted health services, fragile and conflict affected [FCA] countries are more vulnerable to shocks. Previous studies have focused more on conceptualizing heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thu, Kyaw Myat, Bernays, Sarah, Abimbola, Seye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36380333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00484-8
_version_ 1784831203877060608
author Thu, Kyaw Myat
Bernays, Sarah
Abimbola, Seye
author_facet Thu, Kyaw Myat
Bernays, Sarah
Abimbola, Seye
author_sort Thu, Kyaw Myat
collection PubMed
description Understanding how health systems respond to shocks has become a pressing need to strengthen response efforts. With already fragmented and disrupted health services, fragile and conflict affected [FCA] countries are more vulnerable to shocks. Previous studies have focused more on conceptualizing health system resilience rather than how health systems [especially in FCA countries] respond to or are resilient to acute shocks. To understand how health systems in FCA countries respond to the shocks and what influence their responses, we conducted a review of the literature published between January 2011 and September 2021 on health system responses to acute shocks in FCA countries. We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, Jester and Google Scholar – 60 empirical studies in FCA countries on response to sudden, extreme, and unanticipated shocks were included in the review. We found that health systems in FCA countries responded to acute shock using absorptive, adaptive, or transformative capacities. These capacities were mediated by four dimensions of context; knowledge, uncertainties, interdependence, and legitimacy. In addition, we identified the cross-cutting role of community involvement [and its self-evolving nature], frontline workers, and leadership capacity. To our knowledge, this is among the first reviews that focus on FCA country health systems responses to acute shock. By highlighting enabling and constraining factors to each type of capacity, this study provides important lessons and practical strategies from FCA countries on how to absorb, adapt and transform in response to acute shocks – thus promoting health system resilience globally. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13031-022-00484-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9665009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96650092022-11-16 A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries Thu, Kyaw Myat Bernays, Sarah Abimbola, Seye Confl Health Review Understanding how health systems respond to shocks has become a pressing need to strengthen response efforts. With already fragmented and disrupted health services, fragile and conflict affected [FCA] countries are more vulnerable to shocks. Previous studies have focused more on conceptualizing health system resilience rather than how health systems [especially in FCA countries] respond to or are resilient to acute shocks. To understand how health systems in FCA countries respond to the shocks and what influence their responses, we conducted a review of the literature published between January 2011 and September 2021 on health system responses to acute shocks in FCA countries. We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, Jester and Google Scholar – 60 empirical studies in FCA countries on response to sudden, extreme, and unanticipated shocks were included in the review. We found that health systems in FCA countries responded to acute shock using absorptive, adaptive, or transformative capacities. These capacities were mediated by four dimensions of context; knowledge, uncertainties, interdependence, and legitimacy. In addition, we identified the cross-cutting role of community involvement [and its self-evolving nature], frontline workers, and leadership capacity. To our knowledge, this is among the first reviews that focus on FCA country health systems responses to acute shock. By highlighting enabling and constraining factors to each type of capacity, this study provides important lessons and practical strategies from FCA countries on how to absorb, adapt and transform in response to acute shocks – thus promoting health system resilience globally. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13031-022-00484-8. BioMed Central 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9665009/ /pubmed/36380333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00484-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Thu, Kyaw Myat
Bernays, Sarah
Abimbola, Seye
A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries
title A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries
title_full A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries
title_fullStr A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries
title_full_unstemmed A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries
title_short A literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries
title_sort literature review exploring how health systems respond to acute shocks in fragile and conflict-affected countries
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36380333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00484-8
work_keys_str_mv AT thukyawmyat aliteraturereviewexploringhowhealthsystemsrespondtoacuteshocksinfragileandconflictaffectedcountries
AT bernayssarah aliteraturereviewexploringhowhealthsystemsrespondtoacuteshocksinfragileandconflictaffectedcountries
AT abimbolaseye aliteraturereviewexploringhowhealthsystemsrespondtoacuteshocksinfragileandconflictaffectedcountries
AT thukyawmyat literaturereviewexploringhowhealthsystemsrespondtoacuteshocksinfragileandconflictaffectedcountries
AT bernayssarah literaturereviewexploringhowhealthsystemsrespondtoacuteshocksinfragileandconflictaffectedcountries
AT abimbolaseye literaturereviewexploringhowhealthsystemsrespondtoacuteshocksinfragileandconflictaffectedcountries