Cargando…

Semen parameter variability among users of at-home sperm testing kits

BACKGROUND: Despite the generally accepted World Health Organization guidelines on semen analysis, an individual’s results can display significant variation when performed across time or in different laboratories. Semen parameters are in fact highly variable measures that can differ significantly be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aznavour, Yana, Navarrete, Felipe, Badreddine, Jad, Simon, Paul H. G., Gowda, Vrushab, Rhodes, Stephen, Abou Ghayda, Ramy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36380340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01134-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Despite the generally accepted World Health Organization guidelines on semen analysis, an individual’s results can display significant variation when performed across time or in different laboratories. Semen parameters are in fact highly variable measures that can differ significantly between various analyses. Numerous researchers have discovered a wide range of semen parameters within each individual male, but only a few studies included the analysis of semen parameters variability in patients with infertility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter- and intra-individual variability of semen parameters in men of reproductive age with normozoospermia and those with oligozoospermia. METHODS: Five hundred and thirteen who provided ≥ 2 semen samples (798 samples in total) using an at-home mail-in kit over a period of about 2 years were enrolled in the study. Semen samples collection using Give Legacy at-home mail-in semen collection kit; semen analysis at a CLIA-certified laboratory. RESULTS: The degree of intra-subject variation across all semen parameters was lower in men with normozoospermia compared to men with oligozoospermia. Men with normozoospermia furthermore demonstrated a level of intra-subject variation that was lower than inter-subject variation across all measured parameters. No association was observed between intra-subject coefficients of variation in any of the semen parameters, including sperm concentration, sperm count, motile sperm count, total motility, progressive motility, the percentage of sperm with normal morphology, and the age, duration of abstinence, and BMI of the men. CONCLUSION: The results of this observational study confirm the significant variability in semen parameters in men with normozoospermia and oligozoospermia, as measured from at-home semen collection kit samples. This further underscore the importance of securing multiple samples for analysis to provide a robust assessment of male fertility. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01134-0.