Cargando…
Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care
BACKGROUND: Phase space is a mechanical systems approach and large-scale data representation of an object in 3-dimensional space. Whether such techniques can be applied to predict left ventricular pressures non-invasively and at the point-of-care is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study prospectively valid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277300 |
_version_ | 1784831272756969472 |
---|---|
author | Bhavnani, Sanjeev P. Khedraki, Rola Cohoon, Travis J. Meine, Frederick J. Stuckey, Thomas D. McMinn, Thomas Depta, Jeremiah P. Bennett, Brett McGarry, Thomas Carroll, William Suh, David Steuter, John A. Roberts, Michael Gillins, Horace R. Shadforth, Ian Lange, Emmanuel Doomra, Abhinav Firouzi, Mohammad Fathieh, Farhad Burton, Timothy Khosousi, Ali Ramchandani, Shyam Sanders, William E. Smart, Frank |
author_facet | Bhavnani, Sanjeev P. Khedraki, Rola Cohoon, Travis J. Meine, Frederick J. Stuckey, Thomas D. McMinn, Thomas Depta, Jeremiah P. Bennett, Brett McGarry, Thomas Carroll, William Suh, David Steuter, John A. Roberts, Michael Gillins, Horace R. Shadforth, Ian Lange, Emmanuel Doomra, Abhinav Firouzi, Mohammad Fathieh, Farhad Burton, Timothy Khosousi, Ali Ramchandani, Shyam Sanders, William E. Smart, Frank |
author_sort | Bhavnani, Sanjeev P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Phase space is a mechanical systems approach and large-scale data representation of an object in 3-dimensional space. Whether such techniques can be applied to predict left ventricular pressures non-invasively and at the point-of-care is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study prospectively validated a phase space machine-learned approach based on a novel electro-mechanical pulse wave method of data collection through orthogonal voltage gradient (OVG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) for the prediction of elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). METHODS: Consecutive outpatients across 15 US-based healthcare centers with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease were enrolled at the time of elective cardiac catheterization and underwent OVG and PPG data acquisition immediately prior to angiography with signals paired with LVEDP (IDENTIFY; NCT #03864081). The primary objective was to validate a ML algorithm for prediction of elevated LVEDP using a definition of ≥25 mmHg (study cohort) and normal LVEDP ≤ 12 mmHg (control cohort), using AUC as the measure of diagnostic accuracy. Secondary objectives included performance of the ML predictor in a propensity matched cohort (age and gender) and performance for an elevated LVEDP across a spectrum of comparative LVEDP (<12 through 24 at 1 mmHg increments). Features were extracted from the OVG and PPG datasets and were analyzed using machine-learning approaches. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 684 subjects stratified into three LVEDP categories, ≤12 mmHg (N = 258), LVEDP 13–24 mmHg (N = 347), and LVEDP ≥25 mmHg (N = 79). Testing of the ML predictor demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76–0.86) for the prediction of an elevated LVEDP with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 68%, respectively. Among a propensity matched cohort (N = 79) the ML predictor demonstrated a similar result AUC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72–0.8). Using a constant definition of elevated LVEDP and varying the lower threshold across LVEDP the ML predictor demonstrated and AUC ranging from 0.79–0.82. CONCLUSION: The phase space ML analysis provides a robust prediction for an elevated LVEDP at the point-of-care. These data suggest a potential role for an OVG and PPG derived electro-mechanical pulse wave strategy to determine if LVEDP is elevated in patients with symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9665374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96653742022-11-15 Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care Bhavnani, Sanjeev P. Khedraki, Rola Cohoon, Travis J. Meine, Frederick J. Stuckey, Thomas D. McMinn, Thomas Depta, Jeremiah P. Bennett, Brett McGarry, Thomas Carroll, William Suh, David Steuter, John A. Roberts, Michael Gillins, Horace R. Shadforth, Ian Lange, Emmanuel Doomra, Abhinav Firouzi, Mohammad Fathieh, Farhad Burton, Timothy Khosousi, Ali Ramchandani, Shyam Sanders, William E. Smart, Frank PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Phase space is a mechanical systems approach and large-scale data representation of an object in 3-dimensional space. Whether such techniques can be applied to predict left ventricular pressures non-invasively and at the point-of-care is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study prospectively validated a phase space machine-learned approach based on a novel electro-mechanical pulse wave method of data collection through orthogonal voltage gradient (OVG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) for the prediction of elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). METHODS: Consecutive outpatients across 15 US-based healthcare centers with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease were enrolled at the time of elective cardiac catheterization and underwent OVG and PPG data acquisition immediately prior to angiography with signals paired with LVEDP (IDENTIFY; NCT #03864081). The primary objective was to validate a ML algorithm for prediction of elevated LVEDP using a definition of ≥25 mmHg (study cohort) and normal LVEDP ≤ 12 mmHg (control cohort), using AUC as the measure of diagnostic accuracy. Secondary objectives included performance of the ML predictor in a propensity matched cohort (age and gender) and performance for an elevated LVEDP across a spectrum of comparative LVEDP (<12 through 24 at 1 mmHg increments). Features were extracted from the OVG and PPG datasets and were analyzed using machine-learning approaches. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 684 subjects stratified into three LVEDP categories, ≤12 mmHg (N = 258), LVEDP 13–24 mmHg (N = 347), and LVEDP ≥25 mmHg (N = 79). Testing of the ML predictor demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76–0.86) for the prediction of an elevated LVEDP with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 68%, respectively. Among a propensity matched cohort (N = 79) the ML predictor demonstrated a similar result AUC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72–0.8). Using a constant definition of elevated LVEDP and varying the lower threshold across LVEDP the ML predictor demonstrated and AUC ranging from 0.79–0.82. CONCLUSION: The phase space ML analysis provides a robust prediction for an elevated LVEDP at the point-of-care. These data suggest a potential role for an OVG and PPG derived electro-mechanical pulse wave strategy to determine if LVEDP is elevated in patients with symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease. Public Library of Science 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9665374/ /pubmed/36378672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277300 Text en © 2022 Bhavnani et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bhavnani, Sanjeev P. Khedraki, Rola Cohoon, Travis J. Meine, Frederick J. Stuckey, Thomas D. McMinn, Thomas Depta, Jeremiah P. Bennett, Brett McGarry, Thomas Carroll, William Suh, David Steuter, John A. Roberts, Michael Gillins, Horace R. Shadforth, Ian Lange, Emmanuel Doomra, Abhinav Firouzi, Mohammad Fathieh, Farhad Burton, Timothy Khosousi, Ali Ramchandani, Shyam Sanders, William E. Smart, Frank Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care |
title | Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care |
title_full | Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care |
title_fullStr | Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care |
title_short | Multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care |
title_sort | multicenter validation of a machine learning phase space electro-mechanical pulse wave analysis to predict elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure at the point-of-care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhavnanisanjeevp multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT khedrakirola multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT cohoontravisj multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT meinefrederickj multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT stuckeythomasd multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT mcminnthomas multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT deptajeremiahp multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT bennettbrett multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT mcgarrythomas multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT carrollwilliam multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT suhdavid multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT steuterjohna multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT robertsmichael multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT gillinshoracer multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT shadforthian multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT langeemmanuel multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT doomraabhinav multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT firouzimohammad multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT fathiehfarhad multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT burtontimothy multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT khosousiali multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT ramchandanishyam multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT sanderswilliame multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare AT smartfrank multicentervalidationofamachinelearningphasespaceelectromechanicalpulsewaveanalysistopredictelevatedleftventricularenddiastolicpressureatthepointofcare |