Cargando…

GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage

MOTIVATION: Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are network representations of random variables (as nodes) and their partial correlations (as edges). GGMs overcome the challenges of high-dimensional data analysis by using shrinkage methodologies. Therefore, they have become useful to reconstruct gene r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernal, Victor, Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano, Bulthuis, Jonas, Guryev, Victor, Horvatovich, Peter, Grzegorczyk, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac657
_version_ 1784831379702284288
author Bernal, Victor
Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano
Bulthuis, Jonas
Guryev, Victor
Horvatovich, Peter
Grzegorczyk, Marco
author_facet Bernal, Victor
Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano
Bulthuis, Jonas
Guryev, Victor
Horvatovich, Peter
Grzegorczyk, Marco
author_sort Bernal, Victor
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are network representations of random variables (as nodes) and their partial correlations (as edges). GGMs overcome the challenges of high-dimensional data analysis by using shrinkage methodologies. Therefore, they have become useful to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from gene-expression profiles. However, it is often ignored that the partial correlations are ‘shrunk’ and that they cannot be compared/assessed directly. Therefore, accurate (differential) network analyses need to account for the number of variables, the sample size, and also the shrinkage value, otherwise, the analysis and its biological interpretation would turn biased. To date, there are no appropriate methods to account for these factors and address these issues. RESULTS: We derive the statistical properties of the partial correlation obtained with the Ledoit–Wolf shrinkage. Our result provides a toolbox for (differential) network analyses as (i) confidence intervals, (ii) a test for zero partial correlation (null-effects) and (iii) a test to compare partial correlations. Our novel (parametric) methods account for the number of variables, the sample size and the shrinkage values. Additionally, they are computationally fast, simple to implement and require only basic statistical knowledge. Our simulations show that the novel tests perform better than DiffNetFDR—a recently published alternative—in terms of the trade-off between true and false positives. The methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and two gene-expression datasets from Escherichia coli and Mus musculus. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package with the methods and the R script with the analysis are available in https://github.com/V-Bernal/GeneNetTools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9665865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96658652022-11-16 GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage Bernal, Victor Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano Bulthuis, Jonas Guryev, Victor Horvatovich, Peter Grzegorczyk, Marco Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are network representations of random variables (as nodes) and their partial correlations (as edges). GGMs overcome the challenges of high-dimensional data analysis by using shrinkage methodologies. Therefore, they have become useful to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from gene-expression profiles. However, it is often ignored that the partial correlations are ‘shrunk’ and that they cannot be compared/assessed directly. Therefore, accurate (differential) network analyses need to account for the number of variables, the sample size, and also the shrinkage value, otherwise, the analysis and its biological interpretation would turn biased. To date, there are no appropriate methods to account for these factors and address these issues. RESULTS: We derive the statistical properties of the partial correlation obtained with the Ledoit–Wolf shrinkage. Our result provides a toolbox for (differential) network analyses as (i) confidence intervals, (ii) a test for zero partial correlation (null-effects) and (iii) a test to compare partial correlations. Our novel (parametric) methods account for the number of variables, the sample size and the shrinkage values. Additionally, they are computationally fast, simple to implement and require only basic statistical knowledge. Our simulations show that the novel tests perform better than DiffNetFDR—a recently published alternative—in terms of the trade-off between true and false positives. The methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and two gene-expression datasets from Escherichia coli and Mus musculus. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package with the methods and the R script with the analysis are available in https://github.com/V-Bernal/GeneNetTools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9665865/ /pubmed/36179082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac657 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Bernal, Victor
Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano
Bulthuis, Jonas
Guryev, Victor
Horvatovich, Peter
Grzegorczyk, Marco
GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
title GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
title_full GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
title_fullStr GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
title_full_unstemmed GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
title_short GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
title_sort genenettools: tests for gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac657
work_keys_str_mv AT bernalvictor genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage
AT soancatlaguilarvenustiano genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage
AT bulthuisjonas genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage
AT guryevvictor genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage
AT horvatovichpeter genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage
AT grzegorczykmarco genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage