Cargando…
GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage
MOTIVATION: Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are network representations of random variables (as nodes) and their partial correlations (as edges). GGMs overcome the challenges of high-dimensional data analysis by using shrinkage methodologies. Therefore, they have become useful to reconstruct gene r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac657 |
_version_ | 1784831379702284288 |
---|---|
author | Bernal, Victor Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano Bulthuis, Jonas Guryev, Victor Horvatovich, Peter Grzegorczyk, Marco |
author_facet | Bernal, Victor Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano Bulthuis, Jonas Guryev, Victor Horvatovich, Peter Grzegorczyk, Marco |
author_sort | Bernal, Victor |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are network representations of random variables (as nodes) and their partial correlations (as edges). GGMs overcome the challenges of high-dimensional data analysis by using shrinkage methodologies. Therefore, they have become useful to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from gene-expression profiles. However, it is often ignored that the partial correlations are ‘shrunk’ and that they cannot be compared/assessed directly. Therefore, accurate (differential) network analyses need to account for the number of variables, the sample size, and also the shrinkage value, otherwise, the analysis and its biological interpretation would turn biased. To date, there are no appropriate methods to account for these factors and address these issues. RESULTS: We derive the statistical properties of the partial correlation obtained with the Ledoit–Wolf shrinkage. Our result provides a toolbox for (differential) network analyses as (i) confidence intervals, (ii) a test for zero partial correlation (null-effects) and (iii) a test to compare partial correlations. Our novel (parametric) methods account for the number of variables, the sample size and the shrinkage values. Additionally, they are computationally fast, simple to implement and require only basic statistical knowledge. Our simulations show that the novel tests perform better than DiffNetFDR—a recently published alternative—in terms of the trade-off between true and false positives. The methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and two gene-expression datasets from Escherichia coli and Mus musculus. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package with the methods and the R script with the analysis are available in https://github.com/V-Bernal/GeneNetTools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9665865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96658652022-11-16 GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage Bernal, Victor Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano Bulthuis, Jonas Guryev, Victor Horvatovich, Peter Grzegorczyk, Marco Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Gaussian graphical models (GGMs) are network representations of random variables (as nodes) and their partial correlations (as edges). GGMs overcome the challenges of high-dimensional data analysis by using shrinkage methodologies. Therefore, they have become useful to reconstruct gene regulatory networks from gene-expression profiles. However, it is often ignored that the partial correlations are ‘shrunk’ and that they cannot be compared/assessed directly. Therefore, accurate (differential) network analyses need to account for the number of variables, the sample size, and also the shrinkage value, otherwise, the analysis and its biological interpretation would turn biased. To date, there are no appropriate methods to account for these factors and address these issues. RESULTS: We derive the statistical properties of the partial correlation obtained with the Ledoit–Wolf shrinkage. Our result provides a toolbox for (differential) network analyses as (i) confidence intervals, (ii) a test for zero partial correlation (null-effects) and (iii) a test to compare partial correlations. Our novel (parametric) methods account for the number of variables, the sample size and the shrinkage values. Additionally, they are computationally fast, simple to implement and require only basic statistical knowledge. Our simulations show that the novel tests perform better than DiffNetFDR—a recently published alternative—in terms of the trade-off between true and false positives. The methods are demonstrated on synthetic data and two gene-expression datasets from Escherichia coli and Mus musculus. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package with the methods and the R script with the analysis are available in https://github.com/V-Bernal/GeneNetTools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9665865/ /pubmed/36179082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac657 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Bernal, Victor Soancatl-Aguilar, Venustiano Bulthuis, Jonas Guryev, Victor Horvatovich, Peter Grzegorczyk, Marco GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage |
title | GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage |
title_full | GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage |
title_fullStr | GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage |
title_full_unstemmed | GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage |
title_short | GeneNetTools: tests for Gaussian graphical models with shrinkage |
title_sort | genenettools: tests for gaussian graphical models with shrinkage |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9665865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac657 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernalvictor genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage AT soancatlaguilarvenustiano genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage AT bulthuisjonas genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage AT guryevvictor genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage AT horvatovichpeter genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage AT grzegorczykmarco genenettoolstestsforgaussiangraphicalmodelswithshrinkage |