Cargando…

Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Pilonidal sinus is a common disease in the sacrococcygeal region. Although many treatments have been described in recent years, the recurrence of each method remains high. Surgeons did not reach a consensus on the preferred approach for pilonidal sinus. We carried out a meta-analysis of controlled c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Sihan, Dai, Guangyao, Liu, Peng, Zhao, Xian, Zhang, Jie, Yang, Chengpeng, Xu, Xin, Wang, Liwei, Chen, Wen, Wang, Mingxiang, Zhang, Dian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031767
_version_ 1784831427393617920
author Chen, Sihan
Dai, Guangyao
Liu, Peng
Zhao, Xian
Zhang, Jie
Yang, Chengpeng
Xu, Xin
Wang, Liwei
Chen, Wen
Wang, Mingxiang
Zhang, Dian
author_facet Chen, Sihan
Dai, Guangyao
Liu, Peng
Zhao, Xian
Zhang, Jie
Yang, Chengpeng
Xu, Xin
Wang, Liwei
Chen, Wen
Wang, Mingxiang
Zhang, Dian
author_sort Chen, Sihan
collection PubMed
description Pilonidal sinus is a common disease in the sacrococcygeal region. Although many treatments have been described in recent years, the recurrence of each method remains high. Surgeons did not reach a consensus on the preferred approach for pilonidal sinus. We carried out a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials comparing the outcomes of endoscopic treatment versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus disease in this study. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search, and we used electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library to search for the relevant literature comparing endoscopic management to other conventional treatments for pilonidal sinus disease. The primary outcome parameters were operative time, recurrence, postoperative complications and pain, and total healing time. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the review. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment had a lower overall complication rate than the conventional surgery group (risk ratio = 0.33 [0.19–0.58], P = .0001) and lower pain score with a weighted mean difference of −2.44 (95% confidence interval: (−3.96) to (−0.92), I(2) = 99%, P = .002). There was no significant difference in recurrence (risk ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [0.30–1.90],P = .55). Compared to the excision followed by the primary closure technique, the operation time, time to complete wound healing, and satisfaction were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment is a unique and potential method of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease treatment. The foremost benefits of this technique are mild postoperative pain, lower complications rate, and return to routine for a shorter time. However, due to the limited number of articles, we need to conduct more rigorous large-sample prospective randomized controlled trials to clarify the efficiency of endoscopic treatment for pilonidal cysts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9666099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96660992022-11-16 Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials Chen, Sihan Dai, Guangyao Liu, Peng Zhao, Xian Zhang, Jie Yang, Chengpeng Xu, Xin Wang, Liwei Chen, Wen Wang, Mingxiang Zhang, Dian Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Pilonidal sinus is a common disease in the sacrococcygeal region. Although many treatments have been described in recent years, the recurrence of each method remains high. Surgeons did not reach a consensus on the preferred approach for pilonidal sinus. We carried out a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials comparing the outcomes of endoscopic treatment versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus disease in this study. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search, and we used electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library to search for the relevant literature comparing endoscopic management to other conventional treatments for pilonidal sinus disease. The primary outcome parameters were operative time, recurrence, postoperative complications and pain, and total healing time. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the review. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment had a lower overall complication rate than the conventional surgery group (risk ratio = 0.33 [0.19–0.58], P = .0001) and lower pain score with a weighted mean difference of −2.44 (95% confidence interval: (−3.96) to (−0.92), I(2) = 99%, P = .002). There was no significant difference in recurrence (risk ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [0.30–1.90],P = .55). Compared to the excision followed by the primary closure technique, the operation time, time to complete wound healing, and satisfaction were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment is a unique and potential method of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease treatment. The foremost benefits of this technique are mild postoperative pain, lower complications rate, and return to routine for a shorter time. However, due to the limited number of articles, we need to conduct more rigorous large-sample prospective randomized controlled trials to clarify the efficiency of endoscopic treatment for pilonidal cysts. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9666099/ /pubmed/36397424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031767 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 7100
Chen, Sihan
Dai, Guangyao
Liu, Peng
Zhao, Xian
Zhang, Jie
Yang, Chengpeng
Xu, Xin
Wang, Liwei
Chen, Wen
Wang, Mingxiang
Zhang, Dian
Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
title Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
title_full Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
title_fullStr Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
title_short Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
title_sort comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031767
work_keys_str_mv AT chensihan comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT daiguangyao comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT liupeng comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT zhaoxian comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT zhangjie comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT yangchengpeng comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT xuxin comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT wangliwei comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT chenwen comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT wangmingxiang comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT zhangdian comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials