Cargando…
Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
Pilonidal sinus is a common disease in the sacrococcygeal region. Although many treatments have been described in recent years, the recurrence of each method remains high. Surgeons did not reach a consensus on the preferred approach for pilonidal sinus. We carried out a meta-analysis of controlled c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031767 |
_version_ | 1784831427393617920 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Sihan Dai, Guangyao Liu, Peng Zhao, Xian Zhang, Jie Yang, Chengpeng Xu, Xin Wang, Liwei Chen, Wen Wang, Mingxiang Zhang, Dian |
author_facet | Chen, Sihan Dai, Guangyao Liu, Peng Zhao, Xian Zhang, Jie Yang, Chengpeng Xu, Xin Wang, Liwei Chen, Wen Wang, Mingxiang Zhang, Dian |
author_sort | Chen, Sihan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pilonidal sinus is a common disease in the sacrococcygeal region. Although many treatments have been described in recent years, the recurrence of each method remains high. Surgeons did not reach a consensus on the preferred approach for pilonidal sinus. We carried out a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials comparing the outcomes of endoscopic treatment versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus disease in this study. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search, and we used electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library to search for the relevant literature comparing endoscopic management to other conventional treatments for pilonidal sinus disease. The primary outcome parameters were operative time, recurrence, postoperative complications and pain, and total healing time. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the review. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment had a lower overall complication rate than the conventional surgery group (risk ratio = 0.33 [0.19–0.58], P = .0001) and lower pain score with a weighted mean difference of −2.44 (95% confidence interval: (−3.96) to (−0.92), I(2) = 99%, P = .002). There was no significant difference in recurrence (risk ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [0.30–1.90],P = .55). Compared to the excision followed by the primary closure technique, the operation time, time to complete wound healing, and satisfaction were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment is a unique and potential method of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease treatment. The foremost benefits of this technique are mild postoperative pain, lower complications rate, and return to routine for a shorter time. However, due to the limited number of articles, we need to conduct more rigorous large-sample prospective randomized controlled trials to clarify the efficiency of endoscopic treatment for pilonidal cysts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9666099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96660992022-11-16 Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials Chen, Sihan Dai, Guangyao Liu, Peng Zhao, Xian Zhang, Jie Yang, Chengpeng Xu, Xin Wang, Liwei Chen, Wen Wang, Mingxiang Zhang, Dian Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Pilonidal sinus is a common disease in the sacrococcygeal region. Although many treatments have been described in recent years, the recurrence of each method remains high. Surgeons did not reach a consensus on the preferred approach for pilonidal sinus. We carried out a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials comparing the outcomes of endoscopic treatment versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus disease in this study. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search, and we used electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library to search for the relevant literature comparing endoscopic management to other conventional treatments for pilonidal sinus disease. The primary outcome parameters were operative time, recurrence, postoperative complications and pain, and total healing time. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the review. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment had a lower overall complication rate than the conventional surgery group (risk ratio = 0.33 [0.19–0.58], P = .0001) and lower pain score with a weighted mean difference of −2.44 (95% confidence interval: (−3.96) to (−0.92), I(2) = 99%, P = .002). There was no significant difference in recurrence (risk ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [0.30–1.90],P = .55). Compared to the excision followed by the primary closure technique, the operation time, time to complete wound healing, and satisfaction were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment is a unique and potential method of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease treatment. The foremost benefits of this technique are mild postoperative pain, lower complications rate, and return to routine for a shorter time. However, due to the limited number of articles, we need to conduct more rigorous large-sample prospective randomized controlled trials to clarify the efficiency of endoscopic treatment for pilonidal cysts. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9666099/ /pubmed/36397424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031767 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 7100 Chen, Sihan Dai, Guangyao Liu, Peng Zhao, Xian Zhang, Jie Yang, Chengpeng Xu, Xin Wang, Liwei Chen, Wen Wang, Mingxiang Zhang, Dian Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials |
title | Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials |
title_full | Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials |
title_short | Comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials |
title_sort | comparative analysis on the effect of the endoscopic versus conventional treatment for pilonidal sinus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9666099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36397424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chensihan comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT daiguangyao comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT liupeng comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT zhaoxian comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT zhangjie comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT yangchengpeng comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT xuxin comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT wangliwei comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT chenwen comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT wangmingxiang comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials AT zhangdian comparativeanalysisontheeffectoftheendoscopicversusconventionaltreatmentforpilonidalsinusametaanalysisofcontrolledclinicaltrials |